TSTP Solution File: KRS009-1 by DCTP---1.31
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : DCTP---1.31
% Problem : KRS009-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : oldtptp
% Command : dctp-wrapper -negpref -complexity -fullrewrite -alternate -resisol %s
% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Dec 4 04:03:41 EST 2010
% Result : Satisfiable 0.00s
% Output : Assurance 0.00s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% running dctp on problem file KRS009-1.oldtptp on host art01.cs.miami.edu
% starting preprocessing loop for 41 clauses
% no conjecture type clause ... restricting relevance to all-negative clauses
% problem statistics for file /tmp/SystemOnTPTP6618/KRS009-1.oldtptp
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 41 ( 10 non-Horn; 1 unit)
% Number of literals : 102 ( 0 equality)
% Maximal clause size : 7
% Number of predicates : 14 ( 0 propositional; 1-2 arity)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 1 constant; 0-1 arity)
% Number of variables : 56 ( 2 singleton)
% Maximal term depth : 2
% Starting proof
% Saturation state reached.
% !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Exit status is success (MODEL found in 0.03 seconds) !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
% Proof search statistics:
% ========================
% Length initial path: 41
% Linking steps (succ/fail): 574 / 226
% Twin-clause inferences: 9
% Eager eliminations: 0
% Rewrites (subgoal/path): 0 / 0
% GR-closures total/c-foldup: 1010 / 71
% Links generated/deleted: 831 / 800
% Links sweeped vector/all: 0(0) / 0(0)
% Clauses in tableau/pruned: 583 / 337
% Regularity/Tautology fails: 83 / 0 (0)
% Renamings/Contractions: 45 / 113
% Variants deleted/subsumed: 544 / 99
% Clauses by splitting: 0
% Variant subsumption tests: 1022
% Fails ful/mat/sig/len: 0 / 680 / 229 / 14
% Pre subsumption tests: 1600
% Subsumed unit/path/back: 31 / 0 / 0
% Coupled eliminations: 50
% Simplifications/lemmas: 30 / 9 (0)
% Foldups root/context: 0 / 56
% Maximum term depth/compl: 3 / 6
% Relevance vectors: 1651
% Unifications/failed: 0 / 0
% Maximum tableau depth: 189
% Killed 1 orphans
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------