TSTP Solution File: KRS009-1 by CARINE---0.734

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : KRS009-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 22:43:22 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.05s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP20907/KRS/KRS009-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ......................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 43] [nf = 0] [nu = 12] [ut = 10]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 174] [nf = 0] [nu = 33] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 630] [nf = 16] [nu = 63] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 2203] [nf = 52] [nu = 129] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 7265] [nf = 138] [nu = 195] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 25882] [nf = 898] [nu = 447] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 90349] [nf = 3206] [nu = 819] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 315678] [nf = 16491] [nu = 3153] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 3 secs [nr = 1074621] [nf = 58380] [nu = 6759] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 11 secs [nr = 3631408] [nf = 257094] [nu = 27129] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 35 secs [nr = 12218004] [nf = 892030] [nu = 61791] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% 	t = 122 secs [nr = 40607186] [nf = 3565041] [nu = 243105] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 122 secs [nr = 40706633] [nf = 3571858] [nu = 243123] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 122 secs [nr = 40706764] [nf = 3571858] [nu = 243144] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 122 secs [nr = 40707239] [nf = 3571906] [nu = 243174] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 122 secs [nr = 40708887] [nf = 3571978] [nu = 243240] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 122 secs [nr = 40718369] [nf = 3572275] [nu = 243306] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 122 secs [nr = 40802782] [nf = 3576569] [nu = 243678] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 125 secs [nr = 42080116] [nf = 3616095] [nu = 253302] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 171 secs [nr = 59847935] [nf = 4275775] [nu = 616068] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 117046989
% 	resolvents: 110770731	factors: 6276258
% Number of unit clauses generated: 1265709
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 1.08
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 1		[1] = 9		[2] = 3		
% Total = 13
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 1265709	[2] = 28161207	[3] = 60597420	[4] = 17893746	[5] = 7754610	[6] = 1268664	
% [7] = 105084	[8] = 549	
% Average size of a generated clause: 4.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] a_1		(+)3	(-)0
% [1] c_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [2] d_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [3] e_1		(+)1	(-)0
% [4] p1most_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [5] p2least_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [6] r1most_1		(+)1	(-)0
% [7] s1most_1		(+)1	(-)0
% [8] t3least_1		(+)1	(-)0
% [9] equalish_2		(+)0	(-)3
% [10] p_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [11] r_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [12] s_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [13] t_2		(+)3	(-)0
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)10	(-)3
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 13
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 174981945
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 197684466
% Number of successful unifications: 117046989
% Number of unification failures: 85877736
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 506551860
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1939981529
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 14
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 1153220
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 4
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 2
% Number of states in UCFA table: 24
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 31
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.77
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 61
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 202924725
% ConstructUnitClause() = 1153232
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 1.29 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 390157
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------