TSTP Solution File: KRS008-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : KRS008-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 22:43:06 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.06s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP20843/KRS/KRS008-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ...................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 32] [nf = 0] [nu = 11] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 136] [nf = 0] [nu = 31] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 561] [nf = 4] [nu = 75] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1858] [nf = 8] [nu = 155] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5495] [nf = 12] [nu = 331] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 14980] [nf = 16] [nu = 651] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 38861] [nf = 20] [nu = 1355] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 97454] [nf = 24] [nu = 2635] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 237651] [nf = 28] [nu = 5451] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 570000] [nf = 32] [nu = 10571] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1342905] [nf = 36] [nu = 21835] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 3133690] [nf = 40] [nu = 42315] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 21 secs [nr = 7221295] [nf = 44] [nu = 87371] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 49 secs [nr = 16532604] [nf = 48] [nu = 169291] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 112 secs [nr = 37491621] [nf = 52] [nu = 349515] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 41111587] [nf = 82] [nu = 406785] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 41111745] [nf = 82] [nu = 406811] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 41112332] [nf = 102] [nu = 406861] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 41116100] [nf = 146] [nu = 407093] [ut = 17]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 41146567] [nf = 920] [nu = 409511] [ut = 17]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 41351511] [nf = 7670] [nu = 427993] [ut = 18]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 128 secs [nr = 43067404] [nf = 65160] [nu = 563685] [ut = 19]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 170 secs [nr = 59305961] [nf = 441170] [nu = 1684239] [ut = 19]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 112960822
% resolvents: 111741307 factors: 1219515
% Number of unit clauses generated: 4935438
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 4.37
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 2 [1] = 10 [4] = 5 [6] = 1 [7] = 1
% Total = 19
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 4935438 [2] = 62473344 [3] = 31609823 [4] = 7432202 [5] = 5170980 [6] = 1339035
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c_1 (+)1 (-)1
% [1] d_1 (+)1 (-)1
% [2] e_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [3] f_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [4] r2most_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [5] s1most_1 (+)1 (-)1
% [6] s2least_1 (+)1 (-)1
% [7] equalish_2 (+)0 (-)2
% [8] r_2 (+)2 (-)0
% [9] s_2 (+)4 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)12 (-)7
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 19
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 570497589
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 121733912
% Number of successful unifications: 112960822
% Number of unification failures: 74614078
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 4
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 619425292
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1157120790
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 16
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 4125062
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 6
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 3
% Number of states in UCFA table: 48
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 57
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.84
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 58
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 187574900
% ConstructUnitClause() = 4125079
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 4.43 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 376536
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------