TSTP Solution File: KRS003_10 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : KRS003_10 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 23:17:01 EDT 2024
% Result : Satisfiable 0.22s 0.52s
% Output : Saturation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_14)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tcf(c_0_18,plain,
! [X1: unreal,X2: real,X3: real] :
( s2least(X1)
| equalish(X2,X3)
| ~ s(X1,X2)
| ~ s(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_19,plain,
! [X1: unreal] :
( s1most(X1)
| s(X1,u3r1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_23,plain,
! [X1: unreal,X2: real,X3: real] :
( equalish(X2,X3)
| ~ s1most(X1)
| ~ s(X1,X2)
| ~ s(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_24,plain,
! [X1: unreal] :
( s(X1,u1r1(X1))
| ~ s2least(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_27,plain,
! [X1: unreal] :
( s1most(X1)
| s(X1,u3r2(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_28,plain,
! [X1: unreal] :
( s1most(X1)
| ~ equalish(u3r2(X1),u3r1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_29,plain,
! [X1: unreal] :
( ~ s2least(X1)
| ~ equalish(u1r2(X1),u1r1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_31,plain,
! [X1: unreal] :
( s(X1,u1r2(X1))
| ~ s2least(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_38,plain,
! [X1: unreal] :
( s2least(X1)
| s1most(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_39,plain,
! [X1: unreal] :
( ~ s2least(X1)
| ~ s1most(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_40,plain,
! [X1: unreal] :
( c(X1)
| ~ s2least(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_41,plain,
! [X1: unreal] :
( d(X1)
| ~ s1most(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_42,plain,
! [X1: unreal] :
( s2least(X1)
| ~ c(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_43,plain,
! [X1: unreal] :
( c(X1)
| ~ e(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_44,plain,
! [X1: unreal] :
( s1most(X1)
| ~ d(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_45,plain,
! [X1: unreal] :
( d(X1)
| ~ f(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_37]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : KRS003_10 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.2.0.
% 0.14/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Sat May 18 22:23:08 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.50 Running first-order model finding
% 0.22/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.52 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 11717 completed with status 1
% 0.22/0.52 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.52 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 11728 completed with status 1
% 0.22/0.52 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.52 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.52
% 0.22/0.52 # No proof found!
% 0.22/0.52 # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.22/0.52 # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.52 # Parsed axioms : 29
% 0.22/0.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Initial clauses : 29
% 0.22/0.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 15
% 0.22/0.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 14
% 0.22/0.52 # Processed clauses : 36
% 0.22/0.52 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 36
% 0.22/0.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Backward-subsumed : 6
% 0.22/0.52 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Generated clauses : 20
% 0.22/0.52 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 9
% 0.22/0.52 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.22/0.52 # Paramodulations : 20
% 0.22/0.52 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # NegExts : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 16
% 0.22/0.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 16
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 20
% 0.22/0.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 80
% 0.22/0.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 58
% 0.22/0.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8
% 0.22/0.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1486
% 0.22/0.52 # Search garbage collected termcells : 138
% 0.22/0.52
% 0.22/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.52 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.22/0.52 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1752 pages
% 0.22/0.52
% 0.22/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.52 # User time : 0.014 s
% 0.22/0.52 # System time : 0.011 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Total time : 0.025 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1716 pages
% 0.22/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------