TSTP Solution File: KRS001-1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : KRS001-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:00:56 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.84s 2.06s
% Output   : Refutation 1.84s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   17 (   9 unt;   0 nHn;  17 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   27 (   0 equ;  11 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( r2least(A)
    | ~ c(A) ),
    file('KRS001-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ r2least(A)
    | ~ e_qualish(u1r2(A),u1r1(A)) ),
    file('KRS001-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ( r(A,u1r1(A))
    | ~ r2least(A) ),
    file('KRS001-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( r(A,u1r2(A))
    | ~ r2least(A) ),
    file('KRS001-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ( r1most(A)
    | ~ d(A) ),
    file('KRS001-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    ( e_qualish(A,B)
    | ~ r1most(C)
    | ~ r(C,A)
    | ~ r(C,B) ),
    file('KRS001-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    ( d(A)
    | ~ e(A) ),
    file('KRS001-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    ( c(A)
    | ~ e(A) ),
    file('KRS001-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(16,axiom,
    e(exist),
    file('KRS001-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(19,plain,
    c(exist),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[16,12]),
    [iquote('hyper,16,12')] ).

cnf(20,plain,
    d(exist),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[16,11]),
    [iquote('hyper,16,11')] ).

cnf(21,plain,
    r2least(exist),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[19,1]),
    [iquote('hyper,19,1')] ).

cnf(22,plain,
    r1most(exist),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[20,7]),
    [iquote('hyper,20,7')] ).

cnf(23,plain,
    r(exist,u1r2(exist)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[21,5]),
    [iquote('hyper,21,5')] ).

cnf(24,plain,
    r(exist,u1r1(exist)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[21,4]),
    [iquote('hyper,21,4')] ).

cnf(28,plain,
    e_qualish(u1r2(exist),u1r1(exist)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[24,9,22,23]),
    [iquote('hyper,24,9,22,23')] ).

cnf(31,plain,
    $false,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[28,3,21]),
    [iquote('hyper,28,3,21')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11  % Problem  : KRS001-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 03:39:45 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.84/2.06  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.84/2.06  The process was started by sandbox on n025.cluster.edu,
% 1.84/2.06  Wed Jul 27 03:39:45 2022
% 1.84/2.06  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 27911.
% 1.84/2.06  
% 1.84/2.06  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.84/2.06  set(auto).
% 1.84/2.06     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.84/2.06     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.84/2.06     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.84/2.06     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.84/2.06     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.84/2.06     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.84/2.06     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.84/2.06     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.84/2.06     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.84/2.06     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.84/2.06     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.84/2.06  clear(print_given).
% 1.84/2.06  
% 1.84/2.06  list(usable).
% 1.84/2.06  0 [] e(exist).
% 1.84/2.06  0 [] r2least(X1)| -c(X1).
% 1.84/2.06  0 [] c(X1)| -r2least(X1).
% 1.84/2.06  0 [] -r2least(X1)| -e_qualish(u1r2(X1),u1r1(X1)).
% 1.84/2.06  0 [] r(X1,u1r1(X1))| -r2least(X1).
% 1.84/2.06  0 [] r(X1,u1r2(X1))| -r2least(X1).
% 1.84/2.06  0 [] r2least(X1)|e_qualish(X3,X2)| -r(X1,X3)| -r(X1,X2).
% 1.84/2.06  0 [] r1most(X1)| -d(X1).
% 1.84/2.06  0 [] d(X1)| -r1most(X1).
% 1.84/2.06  0 [] e_qualish(X3,X2)| -r1most(X1)| -r(X1,X3)| -r(X1,X2).
% 1.84/2.06  0 [] r1most(X1)| -e_qualish(u3r2(X1),u3r1(X1)).
% 1.84/2.06  0 [] r1most(X1)|r(X1,u3r1(X1)).
% 1.84/2.06  0 [] r1most(X1)|r(X1,u3r2(X1)).
% 1.84/2.06  0 [] d(X1)| -e(X1).
% 1.84/2.06  0 [] c(X1)| -e(X1).
% 1.84/2.06  0 [] e(X1)| -c(X1)| -d(X1).
% 1.84/2.06  end_of_list.
% 1.84/2.06  
% 1.84/2.06  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 1.84/2.06  
% 1.84/2.06  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 1.84/2.06  be ordered hyper_res, unit deletion, and factoring, with
% 1.84/2.06  satellites in sos and with nuclei in usable.
% 1.84/2.06  
% 1.84/2.06     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.84/2.06     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.84/2.06     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.84/2.06  
% 1.84/2.06  ------------> process usable:
% 1.84/2.06  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 1 [] r2least(A)| -c(A).
% 1.84/2.06  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 2 [] c(A)| -r2least(A).
% 1.84/2.06  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 3 [] -r2least(A)| -e_qualish(u1r2(A),u1r1(A)).
% 1.84/2.06  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 4 [] r(A,u1r1(A))| -r2least(A).
% 1.84/2.06  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 5 [] r(A,u1r2(A))| -r2least(A).
% 1.84/2.06  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 6 [] r2least(A)|e_qualish(B,C)| -r(A,B)| -r(A,C).
% 1.84/2.06  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 7 [] r1most(A)| -d(A).
% 1.84/2.06  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 8 [] d(A)| -r1most(A).
% 1.84/2.06  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 9 [] e_qualish(A,B)| -r1most(C)| -r(C,A)| -r(C,B).
% 1.84/2.06  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 10 [] r1most(A)| -e_qualish(u3r2(A),u3r1(A)).
% 1.84/2.06  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 11 [] d(A)| -e(A).
% 1.84/2.06  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 12 [] c(A)| -e(A).
% 1.84/2.06  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 13 [] e(A)| -c(A)| -d(A).
% 1.84/2.06  
% 1.84/2.06  ------------> process sos:
% 1.84/2.06  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 16 [] e(exist).
% 1.84/2.06  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 17 [] r1most(A)|r(A,u3r1(A)).
% 1.84/2.06  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 18 [] r1most(A)|r(A,u3r2(A)).
% 1.84/2.06  
% 1.84/2.06  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.84/2.06  
% 1.84/2.06  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.84/2.06  
% 1.84/2.06  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.84/2.06  
% 1.84/2.06  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.00 sec ----> 31 [hyper,28,3,21] $F.
% 1.84/2.06  
% 1.84/2.06  Length of proof is 7.  Level of proof is 4.
% 1.84/2.06  
% 1.84/2.06  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.84/2.06  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.84/2.06  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.84/2.06  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.84/2.06  
% 1.84/2.06  
% 1.84/2.06  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.84/2.06  
% 1.84/2.06  
% 1.84/2.06  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.84/2.06  
% 1.84/2.06  ============ end of search ============
% 1.84/2.06  
% 1.84/2.06  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.84/2.06  clauses given                 12
% 1.84/2.06  clauses generated             44
% 1.84/2.06  clauses kept                  30
% 1.84/2.06  clauses forward subsumed      29
% 1.84/2.06  clauses back subsumed          0
% 1.84/2.06  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.84/2.06  
% 1.84/2.06  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.84/2.06  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.84/2.06  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.84/2.06  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.84/2.06  
% 1.84/2.06  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.84/2.06  
% 1.84/2.06  Process 27911 finished Wed Jul 27 03:39:47 2022
% 1.84/2.06  Otter interrupted
% 1.84/2.06  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------