%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Nitpick---2016
% Problem  : KLE172+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v5.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s

% Computer : n091.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32218.75MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Jan 17 18:04:22 EST 2017

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 25.49s
% Output   : FiniteModel 25.49s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : KLE172+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v5.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s
% 0.02/0.23  % Computer : n091.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.02/0.23  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.02/0.23  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.02/0.23  % Memory   : 32218.75MB
% 0.02/0.23  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% 0.02/0.23  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.02/0.23  % DateTime : Sat Jan 14 16:48:48 CST 2017
% 0.02/0.23  % CPUTime  : 
% 25.49/10.50  Nitpicking formula...
% 25.49/10.50  Timestamp: 16:48:56
% 25.49/10.50  Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured:
% 25.49/10.50  "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light"
% 25.49/10.50  Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes:
% 25.49/10.50    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1
% 25.49/10.50    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2
% 25.49/10.50    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3
% 25.49/10.50    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4
% 25.49/10.50    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5
% 25.49/10.50  % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel
% 25.49/10.50  Nitpick found a counterexample for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4:
% 25.49/10.50  
% 25.49/10.50    Constants:
% 25.49/10.50      bnd_a = i1
% 25.49/10.50      bnd_addition =
% 25.49/10.50        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 25.49/10.50        (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i1, i3 := i3, i4 := i4),
% 25.49/10.50         i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i2, i3 := i3, i4 := i4),
% 25.49/10.50         i3 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i3, i2 := i3, i3 := i3, i4 := i4),
% 25.49/10.50         i4 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i4, i2 := i4, i3 := i4, i4 := i4))
% 25.49/10.50      bnd_b = i4
% 25.49/10.50      bnd_leq =
% 25.49/10.50        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 25.49/10.50        (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)
% 25.49/10.50           (i1 := True, i2 := False, i3 := True, i4 := True),
% 25.49/10.50         i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)
% 25.49/10.50           (i1 := True, i2 := True, i3 := True, i4 := True),
% 25.49/10.50         i3 := (\<lambda>x. _)
% 25.49/10.50           (i1 := False, i2 := False, i3 := True, i4 := True),
% 25.49/10.50         i4 := (\<lambda>x. _)
% 25.49/10.50           (i1 := False, i2 := False, i3 := False, i4 := True))
% 25.49/10.50      bnd_multiplication =
% 25.49/10.50        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 25.49/10.50        (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i2, i3 := i1, i4 := i4),
% 25.49/10.50         i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i2, i3 := i2, i4 := i2),
% 25.49/10.50         i3 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i2, i3 := i3, i4 := i4),
% 25.49/10.50         i4 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i2, i3 := i4, i4 := i4))
% 25.49/10.50      bnd_one = i3
% 25.49/10.50      bnd_sigma = i4
% 25.49/10.50      bnd_star = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i3, i2 := i3, i3 := i3, i4 := i4)
% 25.49/10.50      bnd_zero = i2
% 25.49/10.50  % SZS output end FiniteModel
% 25.49/10.50  Total time: 2.0 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------