TSTP Solution File: KLE148+2 by iProver---3.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.8
% Problem  : KLE148+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:32:17 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 7.50s 1.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.50s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   65 (  47 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  100 (  63 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   67 (  32   ~;  22   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   92 (   4 sgn;  47   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X2,X1,X0] : addition(X0,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(addition(X0,X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',additive_associativity) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0] : addition(X0,zero) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',additive_identity) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0] : addition(X0,X0) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',idempotence) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : multiplication(X0,multiplication(X1,X2)) = multiplication(multiplication(X0,X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiplicative_associativity) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(X0,one) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : multiplication(X0,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X0,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',distributivity1) ).

fof(f10,axiom,
    ! [X0] : zero = multiplication(zero,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',left_annihilation) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0] : strong_iteration(X0) = addition(multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X0)),one),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',infty_unfold1) ).

fof(f18,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( leq(X0,X1)
    <=> addition(X0,X1) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',order) ).

fof(f19,conjecture,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( leq(X3,multiplication(X3,strong_iteration(X4)))
      & ( zero = multiplication(X3,X4)
       => leq(multiplication(X3,strong_iteration(X4)),X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(f20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X3,X4] :
        ( leq(X3,multiplication(X3,strong_iteration(X4)))
        & ( zero = multiplication(X3,X4)
         => leq(multiplication(X3,strong_iteration(X4)),X3) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : addition(X2,addition(X1,X0)) = addition(addition(X2,X1),X0),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( leq(X0,multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X1)))
        & ( zero = multiplication(X0,X1)
         => leq(multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X1)),X0) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ leq(X0,multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X1)))
      | ( ~ leq(multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X1)),X0)
        & zero = multiplication(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( leq(X0,X1)
        | addition(X0,X1) != X1 )
      & ( addition(X0,X1) = X1
        | ~ leq(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1] :
        ( ~ leq(X0,multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X1)))
        | ( ~ leq(multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X1)),X0)
          & zero = multiplication(X0,X1) ) )
   => ( ~ leq(sK0,multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1)))
      | ( ~ leq(multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1)),sK0)
        & zero = multiplication(sK0,sK1) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ( ~ leq(sK0,multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1)))
    | ( ~ leq(multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1)),sK0)
      & zero = multiplication(sK0,sK1) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f26,f28]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : addition(X2,addition(X1,X0)) = addition(addition(X2,X1),X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ! [X0] : addition(X0,zero) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ! [X0] : addition(X0,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : multiplication(X0,multiplication(X1,X2)) = multiplication(multiplication(X0,X1),X2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(X0,one) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f37,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : multiplication(X0,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X0,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    ! [X0] : zero = multiplication(zero,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f44,plain,
    ! [X0] : strong_iteration(X0) = addition(multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X0)),one),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f48,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( leq(X0,X1)
      | addition(X0,X1) != X1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

fof(f49,plain,
    ( ~ leq(sK0,multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1)))
    | zero = multiplication(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

fof(f50,plain,
    ( ~ leq(sK0,multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1)))
    | ~ leq(multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1)),sK0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

cnf(c_49,plain,
    addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

cnf(c_50,plain,
    addition(addition(X0,X1),X2) = addition(X0,addition(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f31]) ).

cnf(c_51,plain,
    addition(X0,zero) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

cnf(c_52,plain,
    addition(X0,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

cnf(c_53,plain,
    multiplication(multiplication(X0,X1),X2) = multiplication(X0,multiplication(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

cnf(c_54,plain,
    multiplication(X0,one) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

cnf(c_56,plain,
    addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X0,X2)) = multiplication(X0,addition(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).

cnf(c_58,plain,
    multiplication(zero,X0) = zero,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).

cnf(c_63,plain,
    addition(multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X0)),one) = strong_iteration(X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).

cnf(c_66,plain,
    ( addition(X0,X1) != X1
    | leq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f48]) ).

cnf(c_68,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1)),sK0)
    | ~ leq(sK0,multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f50]) ).

cnf(c_69,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(sK0,multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1)))
    | multiplication(sK0,sK1) = zero ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f49]) ).

cnf(c_73,plain,
    addition(sK0,sK0) = sK0,
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_52]) ).

cnf(c_76,plain,
    ( addition(sK0,sK0) != sK0
    | leq(sK0,sK0) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_66]) ).

cnf(c_88,plain,
    addition(one,multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X0))) = strong_iteration(X0),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_50,c_49]) ).

cnf(c_232,plain,
    X0 = X0,
    theory(equality) ).

cnf(c_237,plain,
    ( X0 != X1
    | X2 != X3
    | ~ leq(X1,X3)
    | leq(X0,X2) ),
    theory(equality) ).

cnf(c_241,plain,
    sK0 = sK0,
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_232]) ).

cnf(c_565,plain,
    addition(zero,X0) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_49]) ).

cnf(c_569,plain,
    addition(zero,sK0) = sK0,
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_565]) ).

cnf(c_693,plain,
    addition(X0,addition(X0,X1)) = addition(X0,X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_50]) ).

cnf(c_752,plain,
    addition(multiplication(X0,one),multiplication(X0,multiplication(X1,strong_iteration(X1)))) = multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X1)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_88,c_56]) ).

cnf(c_771,plain,
    addition(X0,multiplication(X0,multiplication(X1,strong_iteration(X1)))) = multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X1)),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_752,c_54]) ).

cnf(c_875,plain,
    leq(X0,addition(X0,X1)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_693,c_66]) ).

cnf(c_12733,plain,
    ( addition(zero,X0) != X1
    | X2 != X3
    | ~ leq(X1,X3)
    | leq(addition(zero,X0),X2) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_237]) ).

cnf(c_12734,plain,
    ( addition(zero,sK0) != sK0
    | sK0 != sK0
    | ~ leq(sK0,sK0)
    | leq(addition(zero,sK0),sK0) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_12733]) ).

cnf(c_17835,plain,
    leq(X0,multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X1))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_771,c_875]) ).

cnf(c_17986,plain,
    multiplication(sK0,sK1) = zero,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_69,c_17835]) ).

cnf(c_17987,plain,
    ~ leq(multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1)),sK0),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_68,c_17835]) ).

cnf(c_18553,plain,
    multiplication(sK0,multiplication(sK1,X0)) = multiplication(zero,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_17986,c_53]) ).

cnf(c_18563,plain,
    multiplication(sK0,multiplication(sK1,X0)) = zero,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_18553,c_58]) ).

cnf(c_18806,plain,
    multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1)) = addition(sK0,zero),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_18563,c_771]) ).

cnf(c_18821,plain,
    multiplication(sK0,strong_iteration(sK1)) = addition(zero,sK0),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_18806,c_50,c_49]) ).

cnf(c_18838,plain,
    ~ leq(addition(zero,sK0),sK0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_17987,c_18821]) ).

cnf(c_18839,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_18838,c_12734,c_569,c_241,c_76,c_73]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : KLE148+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.16/0.34  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 12:07:28 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.47  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 7.50/1.64  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 7.50/1.64  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 7.50/1.64  
% 7.50/1.64  %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 7.50/1.64  
% 7.50/1.64  ------  iProver source info
% 7.50/1.64  
% 7.50/1.64  git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 7.50/1.64  git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 7.50/1.64  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 7.50/1.64  git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 7.50/1.64  
% 7.50/1.64  ------ Parsing...
% 7.50/1.64  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 7.50/1.64  
% 7.50/1.64  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 7.50/1.64  
% 7.50/1.64  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 7.50/1.64  
% 7.50/1.64  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 7.50/1.64  ------ Proving...
% 7.50/1.64  ------ Problem Properties 
% 7.50/1.64  
% 7.50/1.64  
% 7.50/1.64  clauses                                 21
% 7.50/1.64  conjectures                             2
% 7.50/1.64  EPR                                     0
% 7.50/1.64  Horn                                    21
% 7.50/1.64  unary                                   14
% 7.50/1.64  binary                                  7
% 7.50/1.64  lits                                    28
% 7.50/1.64  lits eq                                 17
% 7.50/1.64  fd_pure                                 0
% 7.50/1.64  fd_pseudo                               0
% 7.50/1.64  fd_cond                                 0
% 7.50/1.64  fd_pseudo_cond                          0
% 7.50/1.64  AC symbols                              1
% 7.50/1.64  
% 7.50/1.64  ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 7.50/1.64  
% 7.50/1.64  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 7.50/1.64  
% 7.50/1.64  
% 7.50/1.64  ------ 
% 7.50/1.64  Current options:
% 7.50/1.64  ------ 
% 7.50/1.64  
% 7.50/1.64  
% 7.50/1.64  
% 7.50/1.64  
% 7.50/1.64  ------ Proving...
% 7.50/1.64  
% 7.50/1.64  
% 7.50/1.64  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 7.50/1.64  
% 7.50/1.64  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 7.50/1.64  
% 7.50/1.65  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------