TSTP Solution File: KLE148+2 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : KLE148+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 01:50:35 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.50s 2.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.50s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 47 ( 36 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 64 ( 48 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 33 ( 16 ~; 10 |; 4 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 66 ( 3 sgn 40 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals,conjecture,
! [X4,X5] :
( ( multiplication(X4,X5) = zero
=> leq(multiplication(X4,strong_iteration(X5)),X4) )
& leq(X4,multiplication(X4,strong_iteration(X5))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).
fof(additive_associativity,axiom,
! [X3,X2,X1] : addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(addition(X1,X2),X3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',additive_associativity) ).
fof(idempotence,axiom,
! [X1] : addition(X1,X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',idempotence) ).
fof(infty_unfold1,axiom,
! [X1] : strong_iteration(X1) = addition(multiplication(X1,strong_iteration(X1)),one),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',infty_unfold1) ).
fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).
fof(order,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( leq(X1,X2)
<=> addition(X1,X2) = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',order) ).
fof(distributivity1,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',distributivity1) ).
fof(multiplicative_right_identity,axiom,
! [X1] : multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).
fof(multiplicative_associativity,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',multiplicative_associativity) ).
fof(left_annihilation,axiom,
! [X1] : multiplication(zero,X1) = zero,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',left_annihilation) ).
fof(additive_identity,axiom,
! [X1] : addition(X1,zero) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',additive_identity) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X4,X5] :
( ( multiplication(X4,X5) = zero
=> leq(multiplication(X4,strong_iteration(X5)),X4) )
& leq(X4,multiplication(X4,strong_iteration(X5))) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X8,X9,X10] : addition(X10,addition(X9,X8)) = addition(addition(X10,X9),X8),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_associativity]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X12] : addition(X12,X12) = X12,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[idempotence]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X33] : strong_iteration(X33) = addition(multiplication(X33,strong_iteration(X33)),one),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[infty_unfold1]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X6,X7] : addition(X6,X7) = addition(X7,X6),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).
fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( ( multiplication(esk1_0,esk2_0) = zero
| ~ leq(esk1_0,multiplication(esk1_0,strong_iteration(esk2_0))) )
& ( ~ leq(multiplication(esk1_0,strong_iteration(esk2_0)),esk1_0)
| ~ leq(esk1_0,multiplication(esk1_0,strong_iteration(esk2_0))) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
! [X38,X39] :
( ( ~ leq(X38,X39)
| addition(X38,X39) = X39 )
& ( addition(X38,X39) != X39
| leq(X38,X39) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[order])]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X18,X19,X20] : multiplication(X18,addition(X19,X20)) = addition(multiplication(X18,X19),multiplication(X18,X20)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[distributivity1]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X16] : multiplication(X16,one) = X16,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_right_identity]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(addition(X1,X2),X3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
addition(X1,X1) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
strong_iteration(X1) = addition(multiplication(X1,strong_iteration(X1)),one),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( multiplication(esk1_0,esk2_0) = zero
| ~ leq(esk1_0,multiplication(esk1_0,strong_iteration(esk2_0))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( leq(X1,X2)
| addition(X1,X2) != X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
addition(X1,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
addition(one,multiplication(X1,strong_iteration(X1))) = strong_iteration(X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
fof(c_0_30,plain,
! [X13,X14,X15] : multiplication(X13,multiplication(X14,X15)) = multiplication(multiplication(X13,X14),X15),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_associativity]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
( multiplication(esk1_0,esk2_0) = zero
| addition(esk1_0,multiplication(esk1_0,strong_iteration(esk2_0))) != multiplication(esk1_0,strong_iteration(esk2_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
addition(X1,multiplication(X1,X2)) = multiplication(X1,addition(X2,one)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
addition(one,strong_iteration(X1)) = strong_iteration(X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
fof(c_0_34,plain,
! [X24] : multiplication(zero,X24) = zero,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[left_annihilation]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
( ~ leq(multiplication(esk1_0,strong_iteration(esk2_0)),esk1_0)
| ~ leq(esk1_0,multiplication(esk1_0,strong_iteration(esk2_0))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
multiplication(esk1_0,esk2_0) = zero,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_23]),c_0_33])]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
multiplication(zero,X1) = zero,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).
fof(c_0_39,plain,
! [X11] : addition(X11,zero) = X11,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_identity]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
( addition(esk1_0,multiplication(esk1_0,strong_iteration(esk2_0))) != multiplication(esk1_0,strong_iteration(esk2_0))
| ~ leq(multiplication(esk1_0,strong_iteration(esk2_0)),esk1_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
multiplication(esk1_0,multiplication(esk2_0,X1)) = zero,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
addition(X1,zero) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
( addition(esk1_0,multiplication(esk1_0,strong_iteration(esk2_0))) != multiplication(esk1_0,strong_iteration(esk2_0))
| addition(esk1_0,multiplication(esk1_0,strong_iteration(esk2_0))) != esk1_0 ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_25]),c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
multiplication(esk1_0,addition(one,multiplication(esk2_0,X1))) = esk1_0,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_41]),c_0_42]),c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
multiplication(esk1_0,strong_iteration(esk2_0)) != esk1_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_32]),c_0_23]),c_0_33]),c_0_32]),c_0_23]),c_0_33])]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_29]),c_0_45]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : KLE148+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 13:41:49 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.45 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.50/2.46 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 8.50/2.46 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.50/2.46 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.50/2.46 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S059I
% 8.50/2.46 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxPosHorn.
% 8.50/2.46 #
% 8.50/2.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 8.50/2.46 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.50/2.46
% 8.50/2.46 # Proof found!
% 8.50/2.46 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.50/2.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.50/2.46 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.50/2.46
% 8.50/2.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.50/2.46 # User time : 0.099 s
% 8.50/2.46 # System time : 0.010 s
% 8.50/2.46 # Total time : 0.110 s
% 8.50/2.46 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.50/2.46
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------