TSTP Solution File: KLE148+1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : KLE148+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:22:29 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.48s 0.82s
% Output   : Refutation 0.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem  : KLE148+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.10/0.30  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.10/0.30  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 16:23:30 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.48/0.80  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.48/0.80  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.48/0.80  Process 4235 was started by sandbox on n032.cluster.edu,
% 0.48/0.80  Thu Jun 16 16:23:30 2022
% 0.48/0.80  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_4081_n032.cluster.edu".
% 0.48/0.80  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.48/0.80  
% 0.48/0.80  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.48/0.80  
% 0.48/0.80  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_4081_n032.cluster.edu
% 0.48/0.80  
% 0.48/0.80  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.48/0.80  set(auto2).
% 0.48/0.80      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.48/0.80      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.48/0.80      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.48/0.80      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.48/0.80      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.48/0.80      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.48/0.80      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.48/0.80      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.48/0.80      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.48/0.80      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.48/0.80      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.48/0.80      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.48/0.80      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.48/0.80      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.48/0.80      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.48/0.80      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.48/0.80      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.48/0.80      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.48/0.80      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.48/0.80      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.48/0.80      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.48/0.80      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.48/0.80      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.48/0.80      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.48/0.80      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.48/0.80      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.48/0.80      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.48/0.80  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.48/0.80  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.48/0.80  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.48/0.80  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.48/0.80  clear(print_given).
% 0.48/0.80  
% 0.48/0.80  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (19 formulas)
% 0.48/0.80  
% 0.48/0.80  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.48/0.80  
% 0.48/0.80  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.48/0.80  
% 0.48/0.80  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.48/0.80  
% 0.48/0.80  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.48/0.80  1 (all A all B addition(A,B) = addition(B,A)) # label(additive_commutativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.48/0.80  2 (all C all B all A addition(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(addition(A,B),C)) # label(additive_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.48/0.80  3 (all A addition(A,zero) = A) # label(additive_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.48/0.80  4 (all A addition(A,A) = A) # label(idempotence) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.48/0.80  5 (all A all B all C multiplication(A,multiplication(B,C)) = multiplication(multiplication(A,B),C)) # label(multiplicative_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.48/0.80  6 (all A multiplication(A,one) = A) # label(multiplicative_right_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.48/0.80  7 (all A multiplication(one,A) = A) # label(multiplicative_left_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.48/0.80  8 (all A all B all C multiplication(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C))) # label(distributivity1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.48/0.80  9 (all A all B all C multiplication(addition(A,B),C) = addition(multiplication(A,C),multiplication(B,C))) # label(distributivity2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.48/0.80  10 (all A multiplication(zero,A) = zero) # label(left_annihilation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.48/0.80  11 (all A addition(one,multiplication(A,star(A))) = star(A)) # label(star_unfold1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.48/0.80  12 (all A addition(one,multiplication(star(A),A)) = star(A)) # label(star_unfold2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.48/0.80  13 (all A all B all C (leq(addition(multiplication(A,C),B),C) -> leq(multiplication(star(A),B),C))) # label(star_induction1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.48/0.80  14 (all A all B all C (leq(addition(multiplication(C,A),B),C) -> leq(multiplication(B,star(A)),C))) # label(star_induction2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.48/0.82  15 (all A strong_iteration(A) = addition(multiplication(A,strong_iteration(A)),one)) # label(infty_unfold1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.48/0.82  16 (all A all B all C (leq(C,addition(multiplication(A,C),B)) -> leq(C,multiplication(strong_iteration(A),B)))) # label(infty_coinduction) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.48/0.82  17 (all A strong_iteration(A) = addition(star(A),multiplication(strong_iteration(A),zero))) # label(isolation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.48/0.82  18 (all A all B (leq(A,B) <-> addition(A,B) = B)) # label(order) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.48/0.82  19 -(all X0 all X1 (multiplication(X0,X1) = zero -> multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X1)) = X0)) # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.48/0.82  
% 0.48/0.82  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.48/0.82  
% 0.48/0.82  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.48/0.82  
% 0.48/0.82  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.48/0.82  
% 0.48/0.82  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.48/0.82  
% 0.48/0.82  Auto_denials:
% 0.48/0.82    % copying label goals to answer in negative clause
% 0.48/0.82  
% 0.48/0.82  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.48/0.82  Function symbol KB weights:  one=1. zero=1. c1=1. c2=1. multiplication=1. addition=1. star=1. strong_iteration=1.
% 0.48/0.82  
% 0.48/0.82  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.48/0.82  
% 0.48/0.82  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.48/0.82  
% 0.48/0.82  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.48/0.82  
% 0.48/0.82  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.48/0.82  
% 0.48/0.82  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.48/0.82  
% 0.48/0.82  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.48/0.82  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.48/0.82  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.48/0.82  
% 0.48/0.82  % Proof 1 at 0.03 (+ 0.00) seconds: goals.
% 0.48/0.82  % Length of proof is 31.
% 0.48/0.82  % Level of proof is 7.
% 0.48/0.82  % Maximum clause weight is 13.000.
% 0.48/0.82  % Given clauses 57.
% 0.48/0.82  
% 0.48/0.82  1 (all A all B addition(A,B) = addition(B,A)) # label(additive_commutativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.48/0.82  3 (all A addition(A,zero) = A) # label(additive_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.48/0.82  5 (all A all B all C multiplication(A,multiplication(B,C)) = multiplication(multiplication(A,B),C)) # label(multiplicative_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.48/0.82  6 (all A multiplication(A,one) = A) # label(multiplicative_right_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.48/0.82  8 (all A all B all C multiplication(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C))) # label(distributivity1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.48/0.82  9 (all A all B all C multiplication(addition(A,B),C) = addition(multiplication(A,C),multiplication(B,C))) # label(distributivity2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.48/0.82  10 (all A multiplication(zero,A) = zero) # label(left_annihilation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.48/0.82  15 (all A strong_iteration(A) = addition(multiplication(A,strong_iteration(A)),one)) # label(infty_unfold1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.48/0.82  19 -(all X0 all X1 (multiplication(X0,X1) = zero -> multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X1)) = X0)) # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.48/0.82  20 addition(A,zero) = A # label(additive_identity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(3)].
% 0.48/0.82  22 multiplication(A,one) = A # label(multiplicative_right_identity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(6)].
% 0.48/0.82  24 multiplication(zero,A) = zero # label(left_annihilation) # label(axiom).  [clausify(10)].
% 0.48/0.82  25 multiplication(c1,c2) = zero # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(19)].
% 0.48/0.82  26 addition(A,B) = addition(B,A) # label(additive_commutativity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(1)].
% 0.48/0.82  31 strong_iteration(A) = addition(multiplication(A,strong_iteration(A)),one) # label(infty_unfold1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(15)].
% 0.48/0.82  32 addition(one,multiplication(A,strong_iteration(A))) = strong_iteration(A).  [copy(31),rewrite([26(5)]),flip(a)].
% 0.48/0.82  37 multiplication(multiplication(A,B),C) = multiplication(A,multiplication(B,C)) # label(multiplicative_associativity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(5)].
% 0.48/0.82  38 multiplication(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C)) # label(distributivity1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(8)].
% 0.48/0.82  39 addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C)) = multiplication(A,addition(B,C)).  [copy(38),flip(a)].
% 0.48/0.82  40 multiplication(addition(A,B),C) = addition(multiplication(A,C),multiplication(B,C)) # label(distributivity2) # label(axiom).  [clausify(9)].
% 0.48/0.82  41 addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(C,B)) = multiplication(addition(A,C),B).  [copy(40),flip(a)].
% 0.48/0.82  42 multiplication(c1,strong_iteration(c2)) != c1 # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(goals).  [clausify(19)].
% 0.48/0.82  56 multiplication(c1,multiplication(c2,A)) = zero.  [para(25(a,1),37(a,1,1)),rewrite([24(2)]),flip(a)].
% 0.48/0.82  59 multiplication(A,addition(B,one)) = addition(A,multiplication(A,B)).  [para(22(a,1),39(a,1,1)),rewrite([26(4)]),flip(a)].
% 0.48/0.82  60 addition(zero,multiplication(c1,A)) = multiplication(c1,addition(A,c2)).  [para(25(a,1),39(a,1,1)),rewrite([26(7)])].
% 0.48/0.82  63 addition(A,multiplication(A,multiplication(B,strong_iteration(B)))) = multiplication(A,strong_iteration(B)).  [para(32(a,1),39(a,2,2)),rewrite([22(2)])].
% 0.48/0.82  64 addition(zero,multiplication(A,B)) = multiplication(A,B).  [para(20(a,1),41(a,2,1)),rewrite([24(3),26(3)])].
% 0.48/0.82  73 multiplication(c1,addition(A,c2)) = multiplication(c1,A).  [back_rewrite(60),rewrite([64(4)]),flip(a)].
% 0.48/0.82  152 addition(zero,c1) = c1.  [para(25(a,1),59(a,2,2)),rewrite([26(4),73(5),22(3),26(4)]),flip(a)].
% 0.48/0.82  229 multiplication(c1,strong_iteration(c2)) = c1.  [para(56(a,1),63(a,1,2)),rewrite([26(3),152(3)]),flip(a)].
% 0.48/0.82  230 $F # answer(goals).  [resolve(229,a,42,a)].
% 0.48/0.82  
% 0.48/0.82  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.48/0.82  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.48/0.82  
% 0.48/0.82  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.48/0.82  
% 0.48/0.82  Given=57. Generated=740. Kept=200. proofs=1.
% 0.48/0.82  Usable=51. Sos=126. Demods=77. Limbo=6, Disabled=37. Hints=0.
% 0.48/0.82  Megabytes=0.25.
% 0.48/0.82  User_CPU=0.03, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.48/0.82  
% 0.48/0.82  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.48/0.82  
% 0.48/0.82  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.48/0.82  
% 0.48/0.82  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.48/0.82  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.48/0.82  
% 0.48/0.82  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.48/0.82  
% 0.48/0.82  Process 4235 exit (max_proofs) Thu Jun 16 16:23:30 2022
% 0.48/0.82  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------