TSTP Solution File: KLE142+1 by SInE---0.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SInE---0.4
% Problem  : KLE142+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s

% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Dec 25 12:36:16 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 1.02s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.02s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   17
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   59 (  47 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   75 (  40 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   32 (  16   ~;  12   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  105 (  26 sgn  41   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(2,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
    file('/tmp/tmpRBZ5X1/sel_KLE142+1.p_1',multiplicative_left_identity) ).

fof(4,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    file('/tmp/tmpRBZ5X1/sel_KLE142+1.p_1',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(6,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
    file('/tmp/tmpRBZ5X1/sel_KLE142+1.p_1',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

fof(7,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    file('/tmp/tmpRBZ5X1/sel_KLE142+1.p_1',idempotence) ).

fof(10,axiom,
    ! [X1] : strong_iteration(X1) = addition(multiplication(X1,strong_iteration(X1)),one),
    file('/tmp/tmpRBZ5X1/sel_KLE142+1.p_1',infty_unfold1) ).

fof(11,axiom,
    ! [X3,X2,X1] : addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(addition(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/tmp/tmpRBZ5X1/sel_KLE142+1.p_1',additive_associativity) ).

fof(12,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( leq(X3,addition(multiplication(X1,X3),X2))
     => leq(X3,multiplication(strong_iteration(X1),X2)) ),
    file('/tmp/tmpRBZ5X1/sel_KLE142+1.p_1',infty_coinduction) ).

fof(13,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(addition(X1,X2),X3) = addition(multiplication(X1,X3),multiplication(X2,X3)),
    file('/tmp/tmpRBZ5X1/sel_KLE142+1.p_1',distributivity2) ).

fof(16,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( leq(X1,X2)
    <=> addition(X1,X2) = X2 ),
    file('/tmp/tmpRBZ5X1/sel_KLE142+1.p_1',order) ).

fof(19,conjecture,
    ! [X4] : strong_iteration(strong_iteration(X4)) = strong_iteration(one),
    file('/tmp/tmpRBZ5X1/sel_KLE142+1.p_1',goals) ).

fof(20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X4] : strong_iteration(strong_iteration(X4)) = strong_iteration(one),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[19]) ).

fof(23,plain,
    ! [X2] : multiplication(one,X2) = X2,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

cnf(24,plain,
    multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[23]) ).

fof(27,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : addition(X3,X4) = addition(X4,X3),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

cnf(28,plain,
    addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[27]) ).

fof(31,plain,
    ! [X2] : multiplication(X2,one) = X2,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

cnf(32,plain,
    multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[31]) ).

fof(33,plain,
    ! [X2] : addition(X2,X2) = X2,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

cnf(34,plain,
    addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[33]) ).

fof(41,plain,
    ! [X2] : strong_iteration(X2) = addition(multiplication(X2,strong_iteration(X2)),one),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

cnf(42,plain,
    strong_iteration(X1) = addition(multiplication(X1,strong_iteration(X1)),one),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[41]) ).

fof(43,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] : addition(X6,addition(X5,X4)) = addition(addition(X6,X5),X4),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

cnf(44,plain,
    addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(addition(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[43]) ).

fof(45,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ leq(X3,addition(multiplication(X1,X3),X2))
      | leq(X3,multiplication(strong_iteration(X1),X2)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

fof(46,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ leq(X6,addition(multiplication(X4,X6),X5))
      | leq(X6,multiplication(strong_iteration(X4),X5)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[45]) ).

cnf(47,plain,
    ( leq(X1,multiplication(strong_iteration(X2),X3))
    | ~ leq(X1,addition(multiplication(X2,X1),X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[46]) ).

fof(48,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] : multiplication(addition(X4,X5),X6) = addition(multiplication(X4,X6),multiplication(X5,X6)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

cnf(49,plain,
    multiplication(addition(X1,X2),X3) = addition(multiplication(X1,X3),multiplication(X2,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[48]) ).

fof(54,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( ~ leq(X1,X2)
        | addition(X1,X2) = X2 )
      & ( addition(X1,X2) != X2
        | leq(X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

fof(55,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ leq(X3,X4)
        | addition(X3,X4) = X4 )
      & ( addition(X3,X4) != X4
        | leq(X3,X4) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[54]) ).

cnf(56,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | addition(X1,X2) != X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[55]) ).

cnf(57,plain,
    ( addition(X1,X2) = X2
    | ~ leq(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[55]) ).

fof(62,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X4] : strong_iteration(strong_iteration(X4)) != strong_iteration(one),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[20]) ).

fof(63,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X5] : strong_iteration(strong_iteration(X5)) != strong_iteration(one),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[62]) ).

fof(64,negated_conjecture,
    strong_iteration(strong_iteration(esk1_0)) != strong_iteration(one),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[63]) ).

cnf(65,negated_conjecture,
    strong_iteration(strong_iteration(esk1_0)) != strong_iteration(one),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[64]) ).

cnf(91,plain,
    addition(X1,X2) = addition(X1,addition(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[44,34,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(112,plain,
    addition(one,multiplication(X1,strong_iteration(X1))) = strong_iteration(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[42,28,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(179,plain,
    ( leq(X1,multiplication(strong_iteration(one),X2))
    | ~ leq(X1,addition(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[47,24,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(184,plain,
    ( leq(X1,multiplication(strong_iteration(X2),X3))
    | ~ leq(X1,addition(X3,multiplication(X2,X1))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[47,28,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(252,plain,
    leq(X1,addition(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[56,91,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(279,plain,
    leq(X1,addition(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[252,28,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(296,plain,
    leq(X1,addition(X2,addition(X3,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[279,44,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(458,plain,
    leq(X1,addition(X2,addition(X1,X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[296,28,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(506,plain,
    leq(multiplication(X1,X2),addition(X3,multiplication(addition(X1,X4),X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[458,49,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(7902,plain,
    ( leq(X1,multiplication(strong_iteration(one),X2))
    | $false ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[179,252,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(7903,plain,
    leq(X1,multiplication(strong_iteration(one),X2)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[7902,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(7904,plain,
    leq(X1,strong_iteration(one)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[7903,32,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(7916,plain,
    addition(X1,strong_iteration(one)) = strong_iteration(one),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[57,7904,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(7992,plain,
    strong_iteration(one) = addition(strong_iteration(one),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[28,7916,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(25077,plain,
    leq(multiplication(one,X1),addition(X2,multiplication(strong_iteration(X3),X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[506,112,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(25178,plain,
    leq(X1,addition(X2,multiplication(strong_iteration(X3),X1))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[25077,24,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(27125,plain,
    leq(X1,multiplication(strong_iteration(strong_iteration(X2)),X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[184,25178,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(27154,plain,
    leq(X1,strong_iteration(strong_iteration(X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[27125,32,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(27230,plain,
    addition(X1,strong_iteration(strong_iteration(X2))) = strong_iteration(strong_iteration(X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[57,27154,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(27427,plain,
    strong_iteration(strong_iteration(X1)) = strong_iteration(one),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[7992,27230,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(27912,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[65,27427,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(27913,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[27912,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(27914,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    27913,
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/KLE/KLE142+1.p
% --creating new selector for [KLE004+0.ax]
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpRBZ5X1/sel_KLE142+1.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem KLE142+1.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/KLE/KLE142+1.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/KLE/KLE142+1.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------