TSTP Solution File: KLE139+1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : KLE139+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:22:24 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.45s 1.78s
% Output   : Refutation 1.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : KLE139+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 09:04:48 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.41/0.98  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.41/0.98  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.41/0.98  Process 2913 was started by sandbox2 on n024.cluster.edu,
% 0.41/0.98  Thu Jun 16 09:04:48 2022
% 0.41/0.98  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_2760_n024.cluster.edu".
% 0.41/0.98  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_2760_n024.cluster.edu
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.41/0.98  set(auto2).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.41/0.98      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.41/0.98      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.41/0.98  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.41/0.98  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.41/0.98  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.41/0.98  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.41/0.98  clear(print_given).
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (19 formulas)
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.41/0.98  1 (all A all B addition(A,B) = addition(B,A)) # label(additive_commutativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.41/0.98  2 (all C all B all A addition(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(addition(A,B),C)) # label(additive_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.41/0.98  3 (all A addition(A,zero) = A) # label(additive_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.41/0.98  4 (all A addition(A,A) = A) # label(idempotence) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.41/0.98  5 (all A all B all C multiplication(A,multiplication(B,C)) = multiplication(multiplication(A,B),C)) # label(multiplicative_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.41/0.98  6 (all A multiplication(A,one) = A) # label(multiplicative_right_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.41/0.98  7 (all A multiplication(one,A) = A) # label(multiplicative_left_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.41/0.98  8 (all A all B all C multiplication(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C))) # label(distributivity1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.41/0.98  9 (all A all B all C multiplication(addition(A,B),C) = addition(multiplication(A,C),multiplication(B,C))) # label(distributivity2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.41/0.98  10 (all A multiplication(zero,A) = zero) # label(left_annihilation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.41/0.98  11 (all A addition(one,multiplication(A,star(A))) = star(A)) # label(star_unfold1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.41/0.98  12 (all A addition(one,multiplication(star(A),A)) = star(A)) # label(star_unfold2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.41/0.98  13 (all A all B all C (leq(addition(multiplication(A,C),B),C) -> leq(multiplication(star(A),B),C))) # label(star_induction1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.41/0.98  14 (all A all B all C (leq(addition(multiplication(C,A),B),C) -> leq(multiplication(B,star(A)),C))) # label(star_induction2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.45/1.78  15 (all A strong_iteration(A) = addition(multiplication(A,strong_iteration(A)),one)) # label(infty_unfold1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.45/1.78  16 (all A all B all C (leq(C,addition(multiplication(A,C),B)) -> leq(C,multiplication(strong_iteration(A),B)))) # label(infty_coinduction) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.45/1.78  17 (all A strong_iteration(A) = addition(star(A),multiplication(strong_iteration(A),zero))) # label(isolation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.45/1.78  18 (all A all B (leq(A,B) <-> addition(A,B) = B)) # label(order) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.45/1.78  19 -(all X0 strong_iteration(X0) = addition(multiplication(strong_iteration(X0),X0),one)) # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.45/1.78  
% 1.45/1.78  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 1.45/1.78  
% 1.45/1.78  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 1.45/1.78  
% 1.45/1.78  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 1.45/1.78  
% 1.45/1.78  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 1.45/1.78  
% 1.45/1.78  Auto_denials:
% 1.45/1.78    % copying label goals to answer in negative clause
% 1.45/1.78  
% 1.45/1.78  Term ordering decisions:
% 1.45/1.78  Function symbol KB weights:  one=1. zero=1. c1=1. multiplication=1. addition=1. star=1. strong_iteration=1.
% 1.45/1.78  
% 1.45/1.78  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 1.45/1.78  
% 1.45/1.78  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 1.45/1.78  
% 1.45/1.78  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 1.45/1.78  
% 1.45/1.78  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 1.45/1.78  
% 1.45/1.78  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 1.45/1.78  
% 1.45/1.78  Low Water (keep): wt=43.000, iters=3387
% 1.45/1.78  
% 1.45/1.78  Low Water (keep): wt=33.000, iters=3440
% 1.45/1.78  
% 1.45/1.78  Low Water (keep): wt=32.000, iters=3369
% 1.45/1.78  
% 1.45/1.78  Low Water (keep): wt=31.000, iters=3337
% 1.45/1.78  
% 1.45/1.78  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 1.45/1.78  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.45/1.78  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.45/1.78  
% 1.45/1.78  % Proof 1 at 0.79 (+ 0.02) seconds: goals.
% 1.45/1.78  % Length of proof is 49.
% 1.45/1.78  % Level of proof is 8.
% 1.45/1.78  % Maximum clause weight is 17.000.
% 1.45/1.78  % Given clauses 631.
% 1.45/1.78  
% 1.45/1.78  1 (all A all B addition(A,B) = addition(B,A)) # label(additive_commutativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.45/1.78  3 (all A addition(A,zero) = A) # label(additive_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.45/1.78  5 (all A all B all C multiplication(A,multiplication(B,C)) = multiplication(multiplication(A,B),C)) # label(multiplicative_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.45/1.78  6 (all A multiplication(A,one) = A) # label(multiplicative_right_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.45/1.78  7 (all A multiplication(one,A) = A) # label(multiplicative_left_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.45/1.78  8 (all A all B all C multiplication(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C))) # label(distributivity1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.45/1.78  9 (all A all B all C multiplication(addition(A,B),C) = addition(multiplication(A,C),multiplication(B,C))) # label(distributivity2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.45/1.78  10 (all A multiplication(zero,A) = zero) # label(left_annihilation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.45/1.78  11 (all A addition(one,multiplication(A,star(A))) = star(A)) # label(star_unfold1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.45/1.78  12 (all A addition(one,multiplication(star(A),A)) = star(A)) # label(star_unfold2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.45/1.78  15 (all A strong_iteration(A) = addition(multiplication(A,strong_iteration(A)),one)) # label(infty_unfold1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.45/1.78  17 (all A strong_iteration(A) = addition(star(A),multiplication(strong_iteration(A),zero))) # label(isolation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.45/1.78  19 -(all X0 strong_iteration(X0) = addition(multiplication(strong_iteration(X0),X0),one)) # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.45/1.78  20 addition(A,zero) = A # label(additive_identity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(3)].
% 1.45/1.78  22 multiplication(A,one) = A # label(multiplicative_right_identity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(6)].
% 1.45/1.78  23 multiplication(one,A) = A # label(multiplicative_left_identity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(7)].
% 1.45/1.78  24 multiplication(zero,A) = zero # label(left_annihilation) # label(axiom).  [clausify(10)].
% 1.45/1.78  25 addition(A,B) = addition(B,A) # label(additive_commutativity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(1)].
% 1.45/1.78  26 star(A) = addition(one,multiplication(A,star(A))) # label(star_unfold1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(11)].
% 1.45/1.78  27 addition(one,multiplication(A,star(A))) = star(A).  [copy(26),flip(a)].
% 1.45/1.78  28 star(A) = addition(one,multiplication(star(A),A)) # label(star_unfold2) # label(axiom).  [clausify(12)].
% 1.45/1.78  29 addition(one,multiplication(star(A),A)) = star(A).  [copy(28),flip(a)].
% 1.45/1.78  30 strong_iteration(A) = addition(multiplication(A,strong_iteration(A)),one) # label(infty_unfold1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(15)].
% 1.45/1.78  31 addition(one,multiplication(A,strong_iteration(A))) = strong_iteration(A).  [copy(30),rewrite([25(5)]),flip(a)].
% 1.45/1.78  32 strong_iteration(A) = addition(star(A),multiplication(strong_iteration(A),zero)) # label(isolation) # label(axiom).  [clausify(17)].
% 1.45/1.78  33 addition(star(A),multiplication(strong_iteration(A),zero)) = strong_iteration(A).  [copy(32),flip(a)].
% 1.45/1.78  36 multiplication(multiplication(A,B),C) = multiplication(A,multiplication(B,C)) # label(multiplicative_associativity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(5)].
% 1.45/1.78  37 multiplication(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C)) # label(distributivity1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(8)].
% 1.45/1.78  38 addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C)) = multiplication(A,addition(B,C)).  [copy(37),flip(a)].
% 1.45/1.78  39 multiplication(addition(A,B),C) = addition(multiplication(A,C),multiplication(B,C)) # label(distributivity2) # label(axiom).  [clausify(9)].
% 1.45/1.78  40 addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(C,B)) = multiplication(addition(A,C),B).  [copy(39),flip(a)].
% 1.45/1.78  41 strong_iteration(c1) != addition(multiplication(strong_iteration(c1),c1),one) # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(goals).  [clausify(19)].
% 1.45/1.78  42 addition(one,multiplication(strong_iteration(c1),c1)) != strong_iteration(c1) # answer(goals).  [copy(41),rewrite([25(8)]),flip(a)].
% 1.45/1.78  58 multiplication(A,addition(B,one)) = addition(A,multiplication(A,B)).  [para(22(a,1),38(a,1,1)),rewrite([25(4)]),flip(a)].
% 1.45/1.78  62 addition(zero,multiplication(A,B)) = multiplication(A,B).  [para(20(a,1),40(a,2,1)),rewrite([24(3),25(3)])].
% 1.45/1.78  64 addition(A,multiplication(B,multiplication(star(B),A))) = multiplication(star(B),A).  [para(27(a,1),40(a,2,1)),rewrite([23(2),36(3)])].
% 1.45/1.78  66 addition(A,multiplication(B,multiplication(strong_iteration(B),A))) = multiplication(strong_iteration(B),A).  [para(31(a,1),40(a,2,1)),rewrite([23(2),36(3)])].
% 1.45/1.78  67 addition(multiplication(star(A),B),multiplication(strong_iteration(A),zero)) = multiplication(strong_iteration(A),B).  [para(33(a,1),40(a,2,1)),rewrite([36(6),24(5)])].
% 1.45/1.78  68 addition(multiplication(A,multiplication(B,C)),multiplication(D,C)) = multiplication(addition(D,multiplication(A,B)),C).  [para(36(a,1),40(a,1,1)),rewrite([25(6)])].
% 1.45/1.78  69 addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(C,multiplication(D,B))) = multiplication(addition(A,multiplication(C,D)),B).  [para(36(a,1),40(a,1,2))].
% 1.45/1.78  251 multiplication(star(A),A) = multiplication(A,star(A)).  [para(64(a,1),58(a,2)),rewrite([25(4),29(4)]),flip(a)].
% 1.45/1.78  275 multiplication(A,multiplication(strong_iteration(A),zero)) = multiplication(strong_iteration(A),zero).  [para(66(a,1),62(a,1)),flip(a)].
% 1.45/1.78  320 addition(multiplication(A,star(A)),multiplication(strong_iteration(A),zero)) = multiplication(strong_iteration(A),A).  [para(251(a,1),67(a,1,1))].
% 1.45/1.78  324 addition(multiplication(A,zero),multiplication(B,C)) = multiplication(addition(B,multiplication(A,zero)),C).  [para(24(a,1),68(a,1,1,2))].
% 1.45/1.78  358 addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(C,zero)) = multiplication(addition(A,multiplication(C,zero)),B).  [para(24(a,1),69(a,1,2,2))].
% 1.45/1.78  378 multiplication(addition(A,multiplication(strong_iteration(A),zero)),star(A)) = multiplication(strong_iteration(A),A).  [back_rewrite(320),rewrite([358(6)])].
% 1.45/1.78  7929 multiplication(addition(A,multiplication(strong_iteration(A),zero)),B) = multiplication(A,addition(B,multiplication(strong_iteration(A),zero))).  [para(275(a,1),38(a,1,1)),rewrite([324(5),25(9)])].
% 1.45/1.78  7994 multiplication(strong_iteration(A),A) = multiplication(A,strong_iteration(A)).  [back_rewrite(378),rewrite([7929(6),33(5)]),flip(a)].
% 1.45/1.78  8049 $F # answer(goals).  [back_rewrite(42),rewrite([7994(5),31(6)]),xx(a)].
% 1.45/1.78  
% 1.45/1.78  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.45/1.78  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 1.45/1.78  
% 1.45/1.78  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 1.45/1.78  
% 1.45/1.78  Given=631. Generated=31635. Kept=8018. proofs=1.
% 1.45/1.78  Usable=458. Sos=5787. Demods=1129. Limbo=55, Disabled=1738. Hints=0.
% 1.45/1.78  Megabytes=7.58.
% 1.45/1.78  User_CPU=0.79, System_CPU=0.02, Wall_clock=1.
% 1.45/1.78  
% 1.45/1.78  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 1.45/1.78  
% 1.45/1.78  ============================== end of search =========================
% 1.45/1.78  
% 1.45/1.78  THEOREM PROVED
% 1.45/1.78  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.45/1.78  
% 1.45/1.78  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 1.45/1.78  
% 1.45/1.78  Process 2913 exit (max_proofs) Thu Jun 16 09:04:49 2022
% 1.53/1.78  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------