TSTP Solution File: KLE138+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : KLE138+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:44:54 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.27s 1.87s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.42s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (  14 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   14 (  13 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    2 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    8 (   5   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (;  11   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ leq > multiplication > addition > #nlpp > strong_iteration > star > zero > one

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(strong_iteration,type,
    strong_iteration: $i > $i ).

tff(star,type,
    star: $i > $i ).

tff(multiplication,type,
    multiplication: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(addition,type,
    addition: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(one,type,
    one: $i ).

tff(leq,type,
    leq: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(zero,type,
    zero: $i ).

tff(f_104,negated_conjecture,
    strong_iteration(zero) != one,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

tff(f_52,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : ( addition(A,B) = addition(B,A) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

tff(f_56,axiom,
    ! [A] : ( addition(A,zero) = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',additive_identity) ).

tff(f_73,axiom,
    ! [A] : ( multiplication(zero,A) = zero ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',left_annihilation) ).

tff(f_89,axiom,
    ! [A] : ( strong_iteration(A) = addition(multiplication(A,strong_iteration(A)),one) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',infty_unfold1) ).

tff(c_40,plain,
    strong_iteration(zero) != one,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_104]) ).

tff(c_114,plain,
    ! [B_40,A_41] : ( addition(B_40,A_41) = addition(A_41,B_40) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_52]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    ! [A_6] : ( addition(A_6,zero) = A_6 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_56]) ).

tff(c_130,plain,
    ! [A_41] : ( addition(zero,A_41) = A_41 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_114,c_6]) ).

tff(c_20,plain,
    ! [A_19] : ( multiplication(zero,A_19) = zero ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_73]) ).

tff(c_265,plain,
    ! [A_49] : ( addition(multiplication(A_49,strong_iteration(A_49)),one) = strong_iteration(A_49) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_89]) ).

tff(c_291,plain,
    addition(zero,one) = strong_iteration(zero),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_20,c_265]) ).

tff(c_294,plain,
    strong_iteration(zero) = one,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_130,c_291]) ).

tff(c_296,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_40,c_294]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : KLE138+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 23:41:39 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.27/1.87  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.27/1.87  
% 3.27/1.87  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.42/1.89  
% 3.42/1.89  Inference rules
% 3.42/1.89  ----------------------
% 3.42/1.89  #Ref     : 0
% 3.42/1.89  #Sup     : 60
% 3.42/1.89  #Fact    : 0
% 3.42/1.89  #Define  : 0
% 3.42/1.89  #Split   : 0
% 3.42/1.89  #Chain   : 0
% 3.42/1.89  #Close   : 0
% 3.42/1.89  
% 3.42/1.89  Ordering : KBO
% 3.42/1.89  
% 3.42/1.89  Simplification rules
% 3.42/1.89  ----------------------
% 3.42/1.89  #Subsume      : 0
% 3.42/1.89  #Demod        : 16
% 3.42/1.89  #Tautology    : 51
% 3.42/1.89  #SimpNegUnit  : 1
% 3.42/1.89  #BackRed      : 0
% 3.42/1.89  
% 3.42/1.89  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.42/1.89  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.42/1.89  
% 3.42/1.89  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.42/1.89  ----------------------
% 3.42/1.90  Preprocessing        : 0.50
% 3.42/1.90  Parsing              : 0.28
% 3.42/1.90  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 3.42/1.90  Main loop            : 0.27
% 3.42/1.90  Inferencing          : 0.10
% 3.42/1.90  Reduction            : 0.09
% 3.42/1.90  Demodulation         : 0.07
% 3.42/1.90  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.42/1.90  Subsumption          : 0.06
% 3.42/1.90  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.42/1.90  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.42/1.90  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.42/1.90  Total                : 0.81
% 3.42/1.90  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.42/1.90  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.42/1.90  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.42/1.90  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------