TSTP Solution File: KLE113+1 by SInE---0.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SInE---0.4
% Problem  : KLE113+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s

% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Dec 25 12:21:59 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 184.75s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 184.75s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   40 (  40 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   40 (  37 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    6 (   6   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   1 sgn  22   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(2,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(X1,zero) = zero,
    file('/tmp/tmp6m7Fle/sel_KLE113+1.p_4',right_annihilation) ).

fof(4,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    file('/tmp/tmp6m7Fle/sel_KLE113+1.p_4',additive_identity) ).

fof(6,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    file('/tmp/tmp6m7Fle/sel_KLE113+1.p_4',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(12,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] : forward_diamond(X4,X5) = domain(multiplication(X4,domain(X5))),
    file('/tmp/tmp6m7Fle/sel_KLE113+1.p_4',forward_diamond) ).

fof(14,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
    file('/tmp/tmp6m7Fle/sel_KLE113+1.p_4',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

fof(15,axiom,
    ! [X4] : addition(antidomain(antidomain(X4)),antidomain(X4)) = one,
    file('/tmp/tmp6m7Fle/sel_KLE113+1.p_4',domain3) ).

fof(19,axiom,
    ! [X4] : multiplication(antidomain(X4),X4) = zero,
    file('/tmp/tmp6m7Fle/sel_KLE113+1.p_4',domain1) ).

fof(20,axiom,
    ! [X4] : domain(X4) = antidomain(antidomain(X4)),
    file('/tmp/tmp6m7Fle/sel_KLE113+1.p_4',domain4) ).

fof(21,conjecture,
    ! [X4] : forward_diamond(X4,zero) = zero,
    file('/tmp/tmp6m7Fle/sel_KLE113+1.p_4',goals) ).

fof(22,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X4] : forward_diamond(X4,zero) = zero,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[21]) ).

fof(25,plain,
    ! [X2] : multiplication(X2,zero) = zero,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

cnf(26,plain,
    multiplication(X1,zero) = zero,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[25]) ).

fof(29,plain,
    ! [X2] : addition(X2,zero) = X2,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

cnf(30,plain,
    addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[29]) ).

fof(33,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : addition(X3,X4) = addition(X4,X3),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

cnf(34,plain,
    addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[33]) ).

fof(45,plain,
    ! [X6,X7] : forward_diamond(X6,X7) = domain(multiplication(X6,domain(X7))),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

cnf(46,plain,
    forward_diamond(X1,X2) = domain(multiplication(X1,domain(X2))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[45]) ).

fof(49,plain,
    ! [X2] : multiplication(X2,one) = X2,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

cnf(50,plain,
    multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[49]) ).

fof(51,plain,
    ! [X5] : addition(antidomain(antidomain(X5)),antidomain(X5)) = one,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

cnf(52,plain,
    addition(antidomain(antidomain(X1)),antidomain(X1)) = one,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[51]) ).

fof(59,plain,
    ! [X5] : multiplication(antidomain(X5),X5) = zero,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

cnf(60,plain,
    multiplication(antidomain(X1),X1) = zero,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[59]) ).

fof(61,plain,
    ! [X5] : domain(X5) = antidomain(antidomain(X5)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[20]) ).

cnf(62,plain,
    domain(X1) = antidomain(antidomain(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[61]) ).

fof(63,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X4] : forward_diamond(X4,zero) != zero,
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[22]) ).

fof(64,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X5] : forward_diamond(X5,zero) != zero,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[63]) ).

fof(65,negated_conjecture,
    forward_diamond(esk1_0,zero) != zero,
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[64]) ).

cnf(66,negated_conjecture,
    forward_diamond(esk1_0,zero) != zero,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[65]) ).

cnf(67,plain,
    antidomain(antidomain(multiplication(X1,antidomain(antidomain(X2))))) = forward_diamond(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[46,62,theory(equality)]),62,theory(equality)]),
    [unfolding] ).

cnf(68,negated_conjecture,
    antidomain(antidomain(multiplication(esk1_0,antidomain(antidomain(zero))))) != zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[66,67,theory(equality)]),
    [unfolding] ).

cnf(69,plain,
    zero = antidomain(one),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[50,60,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(71,plain,
    addition(zero,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[30,34,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(77,plain,
    addition(antidomain(X1),antidomain(antidomain(X1))) = one,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[52,34,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(233,plain,
    addition(zero,antidomain(zero)) = one,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[77,69,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(249,plain,
    antidomain(zero) = one,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[233,71,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(253,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[68,249,theory(equality)]),69,theory(equality)]),26,theory(equality)]),249,theory(equality)]),69,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(254,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[253,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(255,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    254,
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/KLE/KLE113+1.p
% --creating new selector for [KLE001+0.ax, KLE001+4.ax, KLE001+6.ax]
% eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% -running prover on /tmp/tmp6m7Fle/sel_KLE113+1.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status ResourceOut
% -running prover on /tmp/tmp6m7Fle/sel_KLE113+1.p_2 with time limit 80
% -prover status ResourceOut
% --creating new selector for [KLE001+0.ax, KLE001+4.ax, KLE001+6.ax]
% eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% -running prover on /tmp/tmp6m7Fle/sel_KLE113+1.p_3 with time limit 75
% -prover status ResourceOut
% --creating new selector for [KLE001+0.ax, KLE001+4.ax, KLE001+6.ax]
% -running prover on /tmp/tmp6m7Fle/sel_KLE113+1.p_4 with time limit 55
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem KLE113+1.p solved in phase 3.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/KLE/KLE113+1.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/KLE/KLE113+1.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------