TSTP Solution File: KLE113+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : KLE113+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 01:56:02 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.25s 1.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  35 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   35 (  34 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    4 (   4   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (   1 sgn  22   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X4] : forward_diamond(X4,zero) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',goals) ).

fof(forward_diamond,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] : forward_diamond(X4,X5) = domain(multiplication(X4,domain(X5))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+6.ax',forward_diamond) ).

fof(domain4,axiom,
    ! [X4] : domain(X4) = antidomain(antidomain(X4)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+4.ax',domain4) ).

fof(domain3,axiom,
    ! [X4] : addition(antidomain(antidomain(X4)),antidomain(X4)) = one,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+4.ax',domain3) ).

fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(multiplicative_right_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

fof(domain1,axiom,
    ! [X4] : multiplication(antidomain(X4),X4) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+4.ax',domain1) ).

fof(additive_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_identity) ).

fof(right_annihilation,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(X1,zero) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_annihilation) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X4] : forward_diamond(X4,zero) = zero,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X6,X7] : forward_diamond(X6,X7) = domain(multiplication(X6,domain(X7))),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[forward_diamond]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X5] : domain(X5) = antidomain(antidomain(X5)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[domain4]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X5] : addition(antidomain(antidomain(X5)),antidomain(X5)) = one,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[domain3]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : addition(X3,X4) = addition(X4,X3),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X2] : multiplication(X2,one) = X2,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_right_identity]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X5] : multiplication(antidomain(X5),X5) = zero,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[domain1]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X2] : addition(X2,zero) = X2,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_identity]) ).

fof(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    forward_diamond(esk1_0,zero) != zero,
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    forward_diamond(X1,X2) = domain(multiplication(X1,domain(X2))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    domain(X1) = antidomain(antidomain(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    addition(antidomain(antidomain(X1)),antidomain(X1)) = one,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    multiplication(antidomain(X1),X1) = zero,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    forward_diamond(esk1_0,zero) != zero,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    forward_diamond(X1,X2) = antidomain(antidomain(multiplication(X1,antidomain(antidomain(X2))))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    addition(antidomain(X1),antidomain(antidomain(X1))) = one,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    antidomain(one) = zero,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    addition(zero,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_21]) ).

fof(c_0_30,plain,
    ! [X2] : multiplication(X2,zero) = zero,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[right_annihilation]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    antidomain(antidomain(multiplication(esk1_0,antidomain(antidomain(zero))))) != zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    antidomain(zero) = one,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    multiplication(X1,zero) = zero,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_28]),c_0_33]),c_0_32]),c_0_28])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : KLE113+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 11:15:41 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.25/1.44  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/1.44  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 0.25/1.44  
% 0.25/1.44  # Proof found!
% 0.25/1.44  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/1.44  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/1.44  # Proof object total steps             : 35
% 0.25/1.44  # Proof object clause steps            : 16
% 0.25/1.44  # Proof object formula steps           : 19
% 0.25/1.44  # Proof object conjectures             : 6
% 0.25/1.44  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 3
% 0.25/1.44  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.25/1.44  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 9
% 0.25/1.44  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 9
% 0.25/1.44  # Proof object generating inferences   : 3
% 0.25/1.44  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 11
% 0.25/1.44  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.25/1.44  # Parsed axioms                        : 27
% 0.25/1.44  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.25/1.44  # Initial clauses                      : 28
% 0.25/1.44  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 8
% 0.25/1.44  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 20
% 0.25/1.44  # Processed clauses                    : 28
% 0.25/1.44  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.25/1.44  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.25/1.44  # ...remaining for further processing  : 27
% 0.25/1.44  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.25/1.44  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.25/1.44  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.25/1.44  # Backward-rewritten                   : 3
% 0.25/1.44  # Generated clauses                    : 124
% 0.25/1.44  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 75
% 0.25/1.44  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.25/1.44  # Paramodulations                      : 124
% 0.25/1.44  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.25/1.44  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.25/1.44  # Current number of processed clauses  : 24
% 0.25/1.44  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 21
% 0.25/1.44  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.25/1.44  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.25/1.44  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
% 0.25/1.44  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 60
% 0.25/1.44  # ...number of literals in the above   : 60
% 0.25/1.44  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.25/1.44  # Current number of archived clauses   : 11
% 0.25/1.44  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.25/1.44  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/1.44  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.25/1.44  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/1.44  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.25/1.44  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 6
% 0.25/1.44  # BW rewrite match successes           : 5
% 0.25/1.44  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.25/1.44  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.25/1.44  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2383
% 0.25/1.44  
% 0.25/1.44  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/1.44  # User time                : 0.015 s
% 0.25/1.44  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.25/1.44  # Total time               : 0.017 s
% 0.25/1.44  # Maximum resident set size: 2824 pages
% 0.25/23.43  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.25/23.44  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.51  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.51  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------