TSTP Solution File: KLE090+1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : KLE090+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:26:36 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 3.72s 3.92s
% Output   : Refutation 3.72s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   28 (  26 unt;   0 nHn;  12 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   30 (  25 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    addition(X,zero) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_identity) ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    addition(X,X) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_idempotence) ).

cnf(3,plain,
    addition(X,addition(X,Y)) = addition(X,Y),
    inference('EMBED',[status(thm)],[2]) ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    multiplication(X,one) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    multiplication(one,X) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_left_identity) ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    multiplication(X,addition(Y,Z)) = addition(multiplication(X,Y),multiplication(X,Z)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_distributivity) ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    multiplication(addition(X,Y),Z) = addition(multiplication(X,Z),multiplication(Y,Z)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',left_distributivity) ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    ( ~ leq(X,Y)
    | addition(X,Y) = Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',order) ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    ( leq(X,Y)
    | addition(X,Y) != Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',order) ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    multiplication(antidomain(X),X) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+4.ax',domain1) ).

cnf(14,axiom,
    addition(antidomain(multiplication(X,Y)),antidomain(multiplication(X,antidomain(antidomain(Y))))) = antidomain(multiplication(X,antidomain(antidomain(Y)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+4.ax',domain2) ).

cnf(16,axiom,
    addition(antidomain(antidomain(X)),antidomain(X)) = one,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+4.ax',domain3) ).

cnf(17,plain,
    addition(antidomain(antidomain(X)),addition(antidomain(X),Y)) = addition(one,Y),
    inference('EMBED',[status(thm)],[16]) ).

cnf(25,negated_conjecture,
    addition('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV2') = 'SKOLEMAAAV2',
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

cnf(27,negated_conjecture,
    addition(antidomain('SKOLEMAAAV2'),antidomain('SKOLEMAAAV1')) != antidomain('SKOLEMAAAV1'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

cnf(28,plain,
    zero = antidomain(one),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[5,13,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(44,plain,
    ~ leq(antidomain('SKOLEMAAAV2'),antidomain('SKOLEMAAAV1')),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[11,27]) ).

cnf(47,plain,
    addition(one,antidomain(X)) = one,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[3,17,theory(equality)]),16,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(74,plain,
    multiplication(X,'SKOLEMAAAV2') = addition(multiplication(X,'SKOLEMAAAV1'),multiplication(X,'SKOLEMAAAV2')),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[7,25,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(76,plain,
    X = addition(multiplication(X,antidomain(antidomain(Y))),multiplication(X,antidomain(Y))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[7,16,theory(equality)]),5,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(172,plain,
    antidomain(zero) = one,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[16,28,theory(equality)]),1,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(193,plain,
    X = addition(X,multiplication(antidomain(Y),X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[8,47,theory(equality)]),6,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(254,plain,
    leq(multiplication(antidomain(X),Y),Y),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[12,193]) ).

cnf(645,plain,
    zero = multiplication(antidomain('SKOLEMAAAV2'),'SKOLEMAAAV1'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[74,13,theory(equality)]),1,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(664,plain,
    one = antidomain(multiplication(antidomain('SKOLEMAAAV2'),antidomain(antidomain('SKOLEMAAAV1')))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[14,645,theory(equality)]),47,172,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1744,plain,
    multiplication(antidomain('SKOLEMAAAV2'),antidomain(antidomain('SKOLEMAAAV1'))) = zero,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[13,664,theory(equality)]),6,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1818,plain,
    antidomain('SKOLEMAAAV2') = multiplication(antidomain('SKOLEMAAAV2'),antidomain('SKOLEMAAAV1')),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[76,1744,theory(equality)]),1,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1915,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[254,1818,theory(equality)]),44]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.13  % Problem  : KLE090+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.16/0.36  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.16/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 14:57:56 EDT 2022
% 0.16/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.49  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.50  * 
% 0.22/0.50  * 
% 0.22/0.51  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.22/0.51  * 
% 0.22/0.51  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.22/0.51  * 
% 0.22/0.51  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.22/0.51   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.22/0.51   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.22/0.51   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.22/0.51   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.22/0.51   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.22/0.51   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.22/0.51  * 
% 0.22/0.51  "."
% 0.22/0.51  * 
% 0.22/0.51  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-16T14:57:57
% 0.22/0.51  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n028.cluster.edu at 2022-06-16T14:57:57
% 0.22/0.52  
% 0.22/0.52  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (= (|addition| ?X ?Y) (|addition| ?Y ?X)).
% 0.22/0.52  ; Recognized associativity assertion (= (|addition| ?X (|addition| ?Y ?Z)) (|addition| (|addition| ?X ?Y) ?Z)).
% 0.22/0.52  ; Recognized right identity assertion (= (|addition| ?X |zero|) ?X).
% 0.22/0.52  ; Recognized associativity assertion (= (|multiplication| ?X (|multiplication| ?Y ?Z)) (|multiplication| (|multiplication| ?X ?Y) ?Z)).
% 0.22/0.52  ; Recognized right identity assertion (= (|multiplication| ?X |one|) ?X).
% 0.22/0.52  ; Recognized left identity assertion (= (|multiplication| |one| ?X) ?X).
% 0.22/0.52  ; Recognized possible left inverse assertion (= (|multiplication| (|antidomain| ?X) ?X) |zero|).
% 0.22/0.52  ; Recognized possible right inverse assertion (= (|multiplication| ?X (|coantidomain| ?X)) |zero|).
% 0.22/0.52  ; Declaring addition to be commutative.
% 3.72/3.92  ; Declaring addition to be associative-commutative.
% 3.72/3.92  
% 3.72/3.92  #||
% 3.72/3.92  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.72/3.92  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 3.72/3.92  ||#
% 3.72/3.92  
% 3.72/3.92  ; Summary of computation:
% 3.72/3.92  ;     14548 formulas have been input or derived (from 246 formulas).
% 3.72/3.92  ;      1915 (13%) were retained.  Of these,
% 3.72/3.92  ;           72 ( 4%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 3.72/3.92  ;         1843 (96%) are still being kept.
% 3.72/3.92  ; 
% 3.72/3.92  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 3.72/3.92  ;     0.005   0%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 3.72/3.92  ;     0.001   0%   Assert                       (21 calls)
% 3.72/3.92  ;     0.174   5%   Process new row              (13,735 calls)
% 3.72/3.92  ;     0.038   1%   Resolution                   (490 calls)
% 3.72/3.92  ;     0.217   6%   Paramodulation               (245 calls)
% 3.72/3.92  ;     0.003   0%   Embedding                    (182 calls)
% 3.72/3.92  ;     0.025   1%   Condensing                   (761 calls)
% 3.72/3.92  ;     0.026   1%   Forward subsumption          (761 calls)
% 3.72/3.92  ;     0.002   0%   Backward subsumption         (187 calls)
% 3.72/3.92  ;     0.008   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (1,990 calls)
% 3.72/3.92  ;     2.741  80%   Forward simplification       (13,515 calls)
% 3.72/3.92  ;     0.059   2%   Backward simplification      (1,736 calls)
% 3.72/3.92  ;     0.026   1%   Ordering                     (11,767 calls)
% 3.72/3.92  ;     0.009   0%   Ordering ac                  (1,459 calls)
% 3.72/3.92  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 3.72/3.92  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 3.72/3.92  ;     0.073   2%   Other
% 3.72/3.92  ;     3.407        Total
% 3.72/3.92  ;     3.409        Real time
% 3.72/3.92  ; 
% 3.72/3.92  ; Term-hash-array has 4,272 terms in all.
% 3.72/3.92  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 187 entries (187 at peak, 187 added, 0 deleted).
% 3.72/3.92  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,117 nodes (1,117 at peak, 1,117 added, 0 deleted).
% 3.72/3.92  ;  Retrieved 3,150 possibly forward subsuming rows in 761 calls.
% 3.72/3.92  ;  Retrieved 110 possibly backward subsumed rows in 187 calls.
% 3.72/3.92  ; Path-index has 4,119 entries (4,119 at peak, 4,289 added, 170 deleted).
% 3.72/3.92  ; Path-index has 2,031 nodes (2,031 at peak, 2,138 added, 107 deleted).
% 3.72/3.92  ; Trie-index has 4,119 entries (4,119 at peak, 4,289 added, 170 deleted).
% 3.72/3.92  ; Trie-index has 3,525 nodes (3,534 at peak, 3,872 added, 347 deleted).
% 3.72/3.92  ; Retrieved 5,331,685 generalization terms in 85,720 calls.
% 3.72/3.92  ; Retrieved 8,703 instance terms in 1,566 calls.
% 3.72/3.92  ; Retrieved 38,581 unifiable terms in 1,933 calls.
% 3.72/3.92  ; 
% 3.72/3.92  ; The agenda of rows to process has 36 entries:
% 3.72/3.92  ;     1 with value 14              7 with value 18               1 with value 23
% 3.72/3.92  ;     2 with value 15              2 with value 21               2 with value 24
% 3.72/3.92  ;     2 with value 16              6 with value 22               2 with value 34
% 3.72/3.92  ;    11 with value 17
% 3.72/3.92  ; The agenda of rows to give has 1603 entries:
% 3.72/3.92  ;     1 with value (4 17)         81 with value (4 27)           4 with value (4 38)
% 3.72/3.92  ;    89 with value (4 18)         46 with value (4 28)          10 with value (4 39)
% 3.72/3.92  ;   160 with value (4 19)         56 with value (4 29)           4 with value (4 40)
% 3.72/3.92  ;   156 with value (4 20)         90 with value (4 30)           4 with value (4 42)
% 3.72/3.92  ;   157 with value (4 21)         38 with value (4 31)           8 with value (4 43)
% 3.72/3.92  ;    80 with value (4 22)         58 with value (4 32)           2 with value (4 44)
% 3.72/3.92  ;   179 with value (4 23)         26 with value (4 33)           2 with value (4 45)
% 3.72/3.92  ;    64 with value (4 24)         46 with value (4 34)           2 with value (4 47)
% 3.72/3.92  ;   121 with value (4 25)          4 with value (4 35)           2 with value (4 48)
% 3.72/3.92  ;    97 with value (4 26)         16 with value (4 36)
% 3.72/3.92  Evaluation took:
% 3.72/3.92    3.41 seconds of real time
% 3.72/3.92    3.318983 seconds of user run time
% 3.72/3.92    0.091157 seconds of system run time
% 3.72/3.92    [Run times include 0.115 seconds GC run time.]
% 3.72/3.92    0 calls to %EVAL
% 3.72/3.92    0 page faults and
% 3.72/3.92    244,438,976 bytes consed.
% 3.72/3.92  :PROOF-FOUND
% 3.72/3.92  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-16T14:58:00
% 3.72/3.92  :PROOF-FOUND
% 3.72/3.92  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------