TSTP Solution File: KLE088+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : KLE088+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 01:55:48 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 1.35s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   57 (  54 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   60 (  59 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    8 (   5   ~;   0   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   72 (   1 sgn  44   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( multiplication(domain(X4),X5) = zero
     => addition(domain(X4),antidomain(X5)) = antidomain(X5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',goals) ).

fof(domain3,axiom,
    ! [X4] : addition(antidomain(antidomain(X4)),antidomain(X4)) = one,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+4.ax',domain3) ).

fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(multiplicative_right_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

fof(domain1,axiom,
    ! [X4] : multiplication(antidomain(X4),X4) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+4.ax',domain1) ).

fof(additive_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_identity) ).

fof(domain4,axiom,
    ! [X4] : domain(X4) = antidomain(antidomain(X4)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+4.ax',domain4) ).

fof(additive_associativity,axiom,
    ! [X3,X2,X1] : addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(addition(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_associativity) ).

fof(additive_idempotence,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_idempotence) ).

fof(domain2,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] : addition(antidomain(multiplication(X4,X5)),antidomain(multiplication(X4,antidomain(antidomain(X5))))) = antidomain(multiplication(X4,antidomain(antidomain(X5)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+4.ax',domain2) ).

fof(multiplicative_left_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_left_identity) ).

fof(right_distributivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_distributivity) ).

fof(left_distributivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(addition(X1,X2),X3) = addition(multiplication(X1,X3),multiplication(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',left_distributivity) ).

fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X4,X5] :
        ( multiplication(domain(X4),X5) = zero
       => addition(domain(X4),antidomain(X5)) = antidomain(X5) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X5] : addition(antidomain(antidomain(X5)),antidomain(X5)) = one,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[domain3]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : addition(X3,X4) = addition(X4,X3),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X2] : multiplication(X2,one) = X2,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_right_identity]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X5] : multiplication(antidomain(X5),X5) = zero,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[domain1]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X2] : addition(X2,zero) = X2,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_identity]) ).

fof(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiplication(domain(esk1_0),esk2_0) = zero
    & addition(domain(esk1_0),antidomain(esk2_0)) != antidomain(esk2_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])])]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X5] : domain(X5) = antidomain(antidomain(X5)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[domain4]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    addition(antidomain(antidomain(X1)),antidomain(X1)) = one,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    multiplication(antidomain(X1),X1) = zero,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] : addition(X6,addition(X5,X4)) = addition(addition(X6,X5),X4),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_associativity]) ).

fof(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X2] : addition(X2,X2) = X2,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_idempotence]) ).

fof(c_0_28,plain,
    ! [X6,X7] : addition(antidomain(multiplication(X6,X7)),antidomain(multiplication(X6,antidomain(antidomain(X7))))) = antidomain(multiplication(X6,antidomain(antidomain(X7)))),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[domain2]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(domain(esk1_0),esk2_0) = zero,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    domain(X1) = antidomain(antidomain(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    addition(antidomain(X1),antidomain(antidomain(X1))) = one,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    antidomain(one) = zero,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    addition(zero,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(addition(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    addition(antidomain(multiplication(X1,X2)),antidomain(multiplication(X1,antidomain(antidomain(X2))))) = antidomain(multiplication(X1,antidomain(antidomain(X2)))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(antidomain(antidomain(esk1_0)),esk2_0) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    antidomain(zero) = one,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    addition(X1,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    addition(one,antidomain(multiplication(antidomain(antidomain(esk1_0)),antidomain(antidomain(esk2_0))))) = antidomain(multiplication(antidomain(antidomain(esk1_0)),antidomain(antidomain(esk2_0)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    addition(one,antidomain(X1)) = one,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_31]),c_0_22]) ).

fof(c_0_42,plain,
    ! [X2] : multiplication(one,X2) = X2,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_left_identity]) ).

fof(c_0_43,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] : multiplication(X4,addition(X5,X6)) = addition(multiplication(X4,X5),multiplication(X4,X6)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[right_distributivity]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    antidomain(multiplication(antidomain(antidomain(esk1_0)),antidomain(antidomain(esk2_0)))) = one,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_42]) ).

fof(c_0_46,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] : multiplication(addition(X4,X5),X6) = addition(multiplication(X4,X6),multiplication(X5,X6)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[left_distributivity]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(antidomain(antidomain(esk1_0)),antidomain(antidomain(esk2_0))) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_44]),c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    addition(domain(esk1_0),antidomain(esk2_0)) != antidomain(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    multiplication(addition(X1,X2),X3) = addition(multiplication(X1,X3),multiplication(X2,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_46]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(antidomain(antidomain(esk1_0)),addition(X1,antidomain(antidomain(esk2_0)))) = multiplication(antidomain(antidomain(esk1_0)),X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    addition(antidomain(antidomain(esk1_0)),antidomain(esk2_0)) != antidomain(esk2_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    addition(X1,multiplication(X2,X1)) = multiplication(addition(one,X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(antidomain(antidomain(esk1_0)),antidomain(esk2_0)) = antidomain(antidomain(esk1_0)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_31]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    addition(antidomain(esk2_0),antidomain(antidomain(esk1_0))) != antidomain(esk2_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_54]),c_0_41]),c_0_45]),c_0_55]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.09  % Problem  : KLE088+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.09  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.09/0.28  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.28  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.28  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.28  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.28  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.28  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.28  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.09/0.28  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 08:27:59 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.28  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/1.35  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.15/1.35  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.15/1.35  # Preprocessing time       : 0.010 s
% 0.15/1.35  
% 0.15/1.35  # Proof found!
% 0.15/1.35  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/1.35  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/1.35  # Proof object total steps             : 57
% 0.15/1.35  # Proof object clause steps            : 30
% 0.15/1.35  # Proof object formula steps           : 27
% 0.15/1.35  # Proof object conjectures             : 14
% 0.15/1.35  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 11
% 0.15/1.35  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.15/1.35  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 14
% 0.15/1.35  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 13
% 0.15/1.35  # Proof object generating inferences   : 11
% 0.15/1.35  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 14
% 0.15/1.35  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.15/1.35  # Parsed axioms                        : 21
% 0.15/1.35  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 2
% 0.15/1.35  # Initial clauses                      : 20
% 0.15/1.35  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.15/1.35  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 19
% 0.15/1.35  # Processed clauses                    : 640
% 0.15/1.35  # ...of these trivial                  : 215
% 0.15/1.35  # ...subsumed                          : 54
% 0.15/1.35  # ...remaining for further processing  : 371
% 0.15/1.35  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.15/1.35  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.15/1.35  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.15/1.35  # Backward-rewritten                   : 96
% 0.15/1.35  # Generated clauses                    : 18027
% 0.15/1.35  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 11968
% 0.15/1.35  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.15/1.35  # Paramodulations                      : 18027
% 0.15/1.35  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.15/1.35  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.15/1.35  # Current number of processed clauses  : 275
% 0.15/1.35  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 260
% 0.15/1.35  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 14
% 0.15/1.35  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.15/1.35  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.15/1.35  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9461
% 0.15/1.35  # ...number of literals in the above   : 9461
% 0.15/1.35  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.15/1.35  # Current number of archived clauses   : 97
% 0.15/1.35  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.15/1.35  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/1.35  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.15/1.35  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 153
% 0.15/1.35  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.15/1.35  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 951
% 0.15/1.35  # BW rewrite match successes           : 212
% 0.15/1.35  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.15/1.35  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.15/1.35  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 315494
% 0.15/1.35  
% 0.15/1.35  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/1.35  # User time                : 0.205 s
% 0.15/1.35  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.15/1.35  # Total time               : 0.213 s
% 0.15/1.35  # Maximum resident set size: 15488 pages
% 0.15/23.38  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.15/23.40  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/23.40  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.15/23.41  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/23.41  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.15/23.41  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/23.41  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.15/23.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/23.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.15/23.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/23.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.15/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.15/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.15/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.15/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.15/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.15/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------