TSTP Solution File: KLE086+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : KLE086+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 01:55:47 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.25s 1.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 28 ( 28 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 28 ( 27 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 4 ( 4 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 23 ( 0 sgn 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals,conjecture,
domain(zero) = zero,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',goals) ).
fof(domain3,axiom,
! [X4] : addition(antidomain(antidomain(X4)),antidomain(X4)) = one,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+4.ax',domain3) ).
fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).
fof(multiplicative_right_identity,axiom,
! [X1] : multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).
fof(domain1,axiom,
! [X4] : multiplication(antidomain(X4),X4) = zero,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+4.ax',domain1) ).
fof(additive_identity,axiom,
! [X1] : addition(X1,zero) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_identity) ).
fof(domain4,axiom,
! [X4] : domain(X4) = antidomain(antidomain(X4)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+4.ax',domain4) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
domain(zero) != zero,
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X5] : addition(antidomain(antidomain(X5)),antidomain(X5)) = one,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[domain3]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X3,X4] : addition(X3,X4) = addition(X4,X3),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X2] : multiplication(X2,one) = X2,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_right_identity]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X5] : multiplication(antidomain(X5),X5) = zero,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[domain1]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X2] : addition(X2,zero) = X2,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_identity]) ).
fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
domain(zero) != zero,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X5] : domain(X5) = antidomain(antidomain(X5)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[domain4]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
addition(antidomain(antidomain(X1)),antidomain(X1)) = one,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
multiplication(antidomain(X1),X1) = zero,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
addition(X1,zero) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
domain(zero) != zero,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
domain(X1) = antidomain(antidomain(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
addition(antidomain(X1),antidomain(antidomain(X1))) = one,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
antidomain(one) = zero,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
addition(zero,X1) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
antidomain(antidomain(zero)) != zero,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
antidomain(zero) = one,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_23])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : KLE086+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 07:54:42 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.25/1.43 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/1.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.25/1.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 0.25/1.43
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof found!
% 0.25/1.43 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/1.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object total steps : 28
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object clause steps : 13
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object formula steps : 15
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object conjectures : 6
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object initial clauses used : 7
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object initial formulas used : 7
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 6
% 0.25/1.43 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.25/1.43 # Parsed axioms : 21
% 0.25/1.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2
% 0.25/1.43 # Initial clauses : 19
% 0.25/1.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.25/1.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 18
% 0.25/1.43 # Processed clauses : 24
% 0.25/1.43 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.25/1.43 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 23
% 0.25/1.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.25/1.43 # Generated clauses : 98
% 0.25/1.43 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 62
% 0.25/1.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Paramodulations : 98
% 0.25/1.43 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 20
% 0.25/1.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 19
% 0.25/1.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.25/1.43 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 56
% 0.25/1.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 56
% 0.25/1.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.25/1.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 10
% 0.25/1.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 9
% 0.25/1.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1626
% 0.25/1.43
% 0.25/1.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/1.43 # User time : 0.014 s
% 0.25/1.43 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.25/1.43 # Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.25/1.43 # Maximum resident set size: 2812 pages
% 0.27/23.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.27/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------