TSTP Solution File: KLE080+1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : KLE080+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:26:32 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 91.73s 91.99s
% Output   : Refutation 91.73s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   42 (  40 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   44 (  38 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   60 (   8 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    addition(X,zero) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_identity) ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    addition(X,X) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_idempotence) ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    multiplication(X,multiplication(Y,Z)) = multiplication(multiplication(X,Y),Z),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_associativity) ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    multiplication(X,one) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    multiplication(one,X) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_left_identity) ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    multiplication(X,addition(Y,Z)) = addition(multiplication(X,Y),multiplication(X,Z)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_distributivity) ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    multiplication(addition(X,Y),Z) = addition(multiplication(X,Z),multiplication(Y,Z)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',left_distributivity) ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    multiplication(zero,X) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',left_annihilation) ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    ( ~ leq(X,Y)
    | addition(X,Y) = Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',order) ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    ( leq(X,Y)
    | addition(X,Y) != Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',order) ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    addition(X,multiplication(domain(X),X)) = multiplication(domain(X),X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+5.ax',domain1) ).

cnf(15,axiom,
    domain(multiplication(X,Y)) = domain(multiplication(X,domain(Y))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+5.ax',domain2) ).

cnf(16,axiom,
    addition(domain(X),one) = one,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+5.ax',domain3) ).

cnf(17,plain,
    addition(domain(X),addition(one,Y)) = addition(one,Y),
    inference('EMBED',[status(thm)],[16]) ).

cnf(18,axiom,
    domain(zero) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+5.ax',domain4) ).

cnf(21,negated_conjecture,
    addition(domain(X),antidomain(X)) = one,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

cnf(22,plain,
    addition(domain(X),addition(antidomain(X),Y)) = addition(one,Y),
    inference('EMBED',[status(thm)],[21]) ).

cnf(23,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(domain(X),antidomain(X)) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

cnf(24,negated_conjecture,
    antidomain(antidomain('SKOLEMAAAV1')) != domain('SKOLEMAAAV1'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

cnf(26,plain,
    one = addition(one,antidomain(X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[17,22,theory(equality)]),2,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(63,plain,
    domain(X) = domain(domain(X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[15,6,theory(equality)]),6,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(74,plain,
    addition(multiplication(X,domain(Y)),multiplication(domain(multiplication(X,Y)),multiplication(X,domain(Y)))) = multiplication(domain(multiplication(X,Y)),multiplication(X,domain(Y))),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[13,15,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(127,plain,
    X = addition(X,multiplication(X,domain(Y))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[7,16,theory(equality)]),5,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(130,plain,
    X = addition(multiplication(X,domain(Y)),multiplication(X,antidomain(Y))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[7,21,theory(equality)]),5,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(143,plain,
    X = addition(X,multiplication(domain(Y),X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[8,16,theory(equality)]),6,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(176,plain,
    multiplication(X,domain(Y)) = multiplication(domain(multiplication(X,Y)),multiplication(X,domain(Y))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[74,143,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(177,plain,
    multiplication(domain(X),X) = X,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[13,143,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(184,plain,
    X = addition(multiplication(domain(Y),X),multiplication(antidomain(Y),X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[8,21,theory(equality)]),6,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(194,plain,
    multiplication(X,Y) = multiplication(multiplication(X,domain(Y)),Y),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[4,177,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(210,plain,
    X = addition(X,multiplication(X,antidomain(Y))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[7,26,theory(equality)]),5,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(218,plain,
    multiplication(domain(X),antidomain(domain(X))) = zero,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[23,63,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(456,plain,
    leq(multiplication(X,antidomain(Y)),X),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[12,210]) ).

cnf(625,plain,
    leq(multiplication(X,antidomain(Y)),multiplication(X,domain(antidomain(Y)))),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[456,194,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(911,plain,
    antidomain(X) = multiplication(antidomain(X),antidomain(X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[184,23,theory(equality)]),1,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(4485,plain,
    leq(antidomain(X),multiplication(antidomain(X),domain(antidomain(X)))),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[625,911,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(5026,plain,
    antidomain(X) = multiplication(antidomain(X),domain(antidomain(X))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[11,4485]),127,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(5054,plain,
    multiplication(domain(X),domain(antidomain(X))) = zero,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[176,23,theory(equality)]),10,18,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(5070,plain,
    domain(X) = multiplication(domain(X),antidomain(antidomain(X))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[130,5054,theory(equality)]),1,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(5073,plain,
    domain(antidomain(X)) = antidomain(X),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[184,5054,theory(equality)]),1,5026,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(5120,plain,
    multiplication(antidomain(X),antidomain(antidomain(X))) = zero,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[218,5073,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(5226,plain,
    antidomain(antidomain(X)) = domain(X),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[184,5070,theory(equality)]),1,5120,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(7650,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[24,5226,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : KLE080+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 10:00:15 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.47   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.47   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  "."
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-16T10:00:16
% 0.19/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n018.cluster.edu at 2022-06-16T10:00:16
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (= (|addition| ?X ?Y) (|addition| ?Y ?X)).
% 0.19/0.49  ; Recognized associativity assertion (= (|addition| ?X (|addition| ?Y ?Z)) (|addition| (|addition| ?X ?Y) ?Z)).
% 0.19/0.49  ; Recognized right identity assertion (= (|addition| ?X |zero|) ?X).
% 0.19/0.49  ; Recognized associativity assertion (= (|multiplication| ?X (|multiplication| ?Y ?Z)) (|multiplication| (|multiplication| ?X ?Y) ?Z)).
% 0.19/0.49  ; Recognized right identity assertion (= (|multiplication| ?X |one|) ?X).
% 0.19/0.49  ; Recognized left identity assertion (= (|multiplication| |one| ?X) ?X).
% 0.19/0.49  ; Declaring addition to be commutative.
% 91.73/91.99  ; Declaring addition to be associative-commutative.
% 91.73/91.99  
% 91.73/91.99  #||
% 91.73/91.99  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 91.73/91.99  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 91.73/92.00  ||#
% 91.73/92.00  
% 91.73/92.00  ; Summary of computation:
% 91.73/92.00  ;     47585 formulas have been input or derived (from 293 formulas).
% 91.73/92.00  ;      7650 (16%) were retained.  Of these,
% 91.73/92.00  ;         5426 (71%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 91.73/92.00  ;         2224 (29%) are still being kept.
% 91.73/92.00  ; 
% 91.73/92.00  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 91.73/92.00  ;     0.004   0%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 91.73/92.00  ;     0.002   0%   Assert                       (18 calls)
% 91.73/92.00  ;     1.383   2%   Process new row              (45,666 calls)
% 91.73/92.00  ;     0.051   0%   Resolution                   (584 calls)
% 91.73/92.00  ;     0.627   1%   Paramodulation               (292 calls)
% 91.73/92.00  ;     0.011   0%   Embedding                    (536 calls)
% 91.73/92.00  ;     0.067   0%   Condensing                   (2,100 calls)
% 91.73/92.00  ;     0.143   0%   Forward subsumption          (2,100 calls)
% 91.73/92.00  ;     0.025   0%   Backward subsumption         (640 calls)
% 91.73/92.00  ;     0.041   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (6,816 calls)
% 91.73/92.00  ;    86.870  95%   Forward simplification       (45,090 calls)
% 91.73/92.00  ;     1.463   2%   Backward simplification      (7,125 calls)
% 91.73/92.00  ;     0.321   0%   Ordering                     (54,256 calls)
% 91.73/92.00  ;     0.205   0%   Ordering ac                  (10,395 calls)
% 91.73/92.00  ;     0.001   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 91.73/92.00  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 91.73/92.00  ;     0.211   0%   Other
% 91.73/92.00  ;    91.425        Total
% 91.73/92.00  ;    91.524        Real time
% 91.73/92.00  ; 
% 91.73/92.00  ; Term-hash-array has 16,978 terms in all.
% 91.73/92.00  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 239 entries (397 at peak, 640 added, 401 deleted).
% 91.73/92.00  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,396 nodes (2,212 at peak, 3,773 added, 2,377 deleted).
% 91.73/92.00  ;  Retrieved 9,698 possibly forward subsuming rows in 2,100 calls.
% 91.73/92.00  ;  Retrieved 1,241 possibly backward subsumed rows in 640 calls.
% 91.73/92.00  ; Path-index has 5,803 entries (10,192 at peak, 17,891 added, 12,088 deleted).
% 91.73/92.00  ; Path-index has 6,043 nodes (6,043 at peak, 8,359 added, 2,316 deleted).
% 91.73/92.00  ; Trie-index has 5,803 entries (10,192 at peak, 17,891 added, 12,088 deleted).
% 91.73/92.00  ; Trie-index has 4,413 nodes (6,009 at peak, 11,437 added, 7,024 deleted).
% 91.73/92.00  ; Retrieved 35,912,290 generalization terms in 383,090 calls.
% 91.73/92.00  ; Retrieved 74,616 instance terms in 6,561 calls.
% 91.73/92.00  ; Retrieved 75,006 unifiable terms in 2,237 calls.
% 91.73/92.00  ; 
% 91.73/92.00  ; The agenda of rows to process has 21 entries:
% 91.73/92.00  ;     7 with value 22              3 with value 25               1 with value 28
% 91.73/92.00  ;     1 with value 23              2 with value 26               1 with value 29
% 91.73/92.00  ;     3 with value 24              1 with value 27               2 with value 31
% 91.73/92.00  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 4 entries:
% 91.73/92.00  ;     1 with value 11              1 with value 12               2 with value 19
% 91.73/92.00  ; The agenda of rows to give has 2155 entries:
% 91.73/92.00  ;     1 with value (4 13)         95 with value (4 28)          38 with value (4 43)
% 91.73/92.00  ;     1 with value (4 14)        140 with value (4 29)          31 with value (4 44)
% 91.73/92.00  ;     2 with value (4 15)        115 with value (4 30)          31 with value (4 45)
% 91.73/92.00  ;     4 with value (4 16)        114 with value (4 31)          20 with value (4 46)
% 91.73/92.00  ;     1 with value (4 17)        155 with value (4 32)          32 with value (4 47)
% 91.73/92.00  ;     8 with value (4 18)         66 with value (4 33)          18 with value (4 48)
% 91.73/92.00  ;    26 with value (4 19)         98 with value (4 34)          13 with value (4 49)
% 91.73/92.00  ;    25 with value (4 20)         76 with value (4 35)          19 with value (4 50)
% 91.73/92.00  ;    35 with value (4 21)         54 with value (4 36)           7 with value (4 51)
% 91.73/92.00  ;    69 with value (4 22)         70 with value (4 37)          26 with value (4 52)
% 91.73/92.00  ;    53 with value (4 23)         62 with value (4 38)           1 with value (4 53)
% 91.73/92.00  ;    94 with value (4 24)         72 with value (4 39)          16 with value (4 54)
% 91.73/92.00  ;    99 with value (4 25)         45 with value (4 40)           4 with value (4 55)
% 91.73/92.00  ;   128 with value (4 26)         60 with value (4 41)           2 with value (4 59)
% 91.73/92.00  ;    99 with value (4 27)         30 with value (4 42)
% 91.73/92.00  Evaluation took:
% 91.73/92.00    91.525 seconds of real time
% 91.73/92.00    90.746994 seconds of user run time
% 91.73/92.00    0.682302 seconds of system run time
% 91.73/92.00    [Run times include 5.136 seconds GC run time.]
% 91.73/92.00    0 calls to %EVAL
% 91.73/92.00    0 page faults and
% 91.73/92.00    7,725,952,080 bytes consed.
% 91.73/92.00  :PROOF-FOUND
% 91.73/92.00  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-16T10:01:47
% 91.73/92.00  :PROOF-FOUND
% 91.73/92.00  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------