TSTP Solution File: KLE075+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : KLE075+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 01:50:00 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.70s 2.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    7 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    7 (   6 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    domain(multiplication(one,domain(esk1_0))) != domain(esk1_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-64ua4bz2/input.p',i_0_10) ).

cnf(i_0_6,plain,
    domain(multiplication(X1,domain(X2))) = domain(multiplication(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-64ua4bz2/input.p',i_0_6) ).

cnf(i_0_14,plain,
    multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-64ua4bz2/input.p',i_0_14) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    domain(multiplication(one,domain(esk1_0))) != domain(esk1_0),
    i_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    domain(multiplication(X1,domain(X2))) = domain(multiplication(X1,X2)),
    i_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
    i_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : KLE075+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 11:16:22 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.20/0.46  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.20/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.20/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.70/2.42  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 7.70/2.42  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 7.70/2.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.012 s
% 7.70/2.42  
% 7.70/2.42  # Proof found!
% 7.70/2.42  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.70/2.42  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.70/2.42  # Proof object total steps             : 7
% 7.70/2.42  # Proof object clause steps            : 4
% 7.70/2.42  # Proof object formula steps           : 3
% 7.70/2.42  # Proof object conjectures             : 3
% 7.70/2.42  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
% 7.70/2.42  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 1
% 7.70/2.42  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 3
% 7.70/2.42  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 3
% 7.70/2.42  # Proof object generating inferences   : 0
% 7.70/2.42  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 3
% 7.70/2.42  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.70/2.42  # Parsed axioms                        : 19
% 7.70/2.42  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 7.70/2.42  # Initial clauses                      : 19
% 7.70/2.42  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 7.70/2.42  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 19
% 7.70/2.42  # Processed clauses                    : 20
% 7.70/2.42  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 7.70/2.42  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 7.70/2.42  # ...remaining for further processing  : 19
% 7.70/2.42  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 7.70/2.42  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 7.70/2.42  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 7.70/2.42  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 7.70/2.42  # Generated clauses                    : 70
% 7.70/2.42  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 39
% 7.70/2.42  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 7.70/2.42  # Paramodulations                      : 70
% 7.70/2.42  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 7.70/2.42  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 7.70/2.42  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 7.70/2.42  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 7.70/2.42  # Current number of processed clauses  : 17
% 7.70/2.42  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 14
% 7.70/2.42  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 7.70/2.42  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 7.70/2.42  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
% 7.70/2.42  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 37
% 7.70/2.42  # ...number of literals in the above   : 37
% 7.70/2.42  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 7.70/2.42  # Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 7.70/2.42  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 7.70/2.42  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 7.70/2.42  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 7.70/2.42  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 7.70/2.42  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 7.70/2.42  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 13
% 7.70/2.42  # BW rewrite match successes           : 9
% 7.70/2.42  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 7.70/2.42  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 7.70/2.42  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 778
% 7.70/2.42  
% 7.70/2.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.70/2.42  # User time                : 0.007 s
% 7.70/2.42  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 7.70/2.42  # Total time               : 0.013 s
% 7.70/2.42  # ...preprocessing         : 0.012 s
% 7.70/2.42  # ...main loop             : 0.001 s
% 7.70/2.42  # Maximum resident set size: 7132 pages
% 7.70/2.42  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------