TSTP Solution File: KLE075+1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : KLE075+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:04:52 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 13 ( 12 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 4 ( 4 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn; 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals,conjecture,
! [X4] : domain(multiplication(one,domain(X4))) = domain(X4),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ycIVspO48K/E---3.1_4279.p',goals) ).
fof(multiplicative_left_identity,axiom,
! [X1] : multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ycIVspO48K/E---3.1_4279.p',multiplicative_left_identity) ).
fof(domain2,axiom,
! [X4,X5] : domain(multiplication(X4,X5)) = domain(multiplication(X4,domain(X5))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ycIVspO48K/E---3.1_4279.p',domain2) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X4] : domain(multiplication(one,domain(X4))) = domain(X4),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
domain(multiplication(one,domain(esk1_0))) != domain(esk1_0),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X23] : multiplication(one,X23) = X23,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_left_identity]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X8,X9] : domain(multiplication(X8,X9)) = domain(multiplication(X8,domain(X9))),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[domain2]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
domain(multiplication(one,domain(esk1_0))) != domain(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
domain(multiplication(X1,X2)) = domain(multiplication(X1,domain(X2))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
domain(domain(esk1_0)) != domain(esk1_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
domain(domain(X1)) = domain(X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.09 % Problem : KLE075+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.05/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.30 % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 05:18:13 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.40 Running first-order model finding
% 0.14/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ycIVspO48K/E---3.1_4279.p
% 0.14/0.41 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.14/0.41 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.41 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.41 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.41 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41 # new_bool_3 with pid 4357 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.14/0.41 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.41 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.41 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.41 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.41 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.41 # Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.41 # Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S with 135s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41 # H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S with pid 4360 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Result found by H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S
% 0.14/0.41 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.41 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.41 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.41 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.41 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.41 # Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.41 # Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S with 135s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.41 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 # Proof found!
% 0.14/0.41 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.41 # Parsed axioms : 18
% 0.14/0.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1
% 0.14/0.41 # Initial clauses : 17
% 0.14/0.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 17
% 0.14/0.41 # Processed clauses : 34
% 0.14/0.41 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.14/0.41 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 33
% 0.14/0.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.14/0.41 # Generated clauses : 24
% 0.14/0.41 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 10
% 0.14/0.41 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Paramodulations : 24
% 0.14/0.41 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # NegExts : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Total rewrite steps : 24
% 0.14/0.41 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 13
% 0.14/0.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 12
% 0.14/0.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.14/0.41 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 10
% 0.14/0.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 10
% 0.14/0.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 20
% 0.14/0.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 16
% 0.14/0.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 14
% 0.14/0.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/0.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 833
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.41 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.41 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.41 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.41 # Maximum resident set size: 1748 pages
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.41 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.41 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.41 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.14/0.41 # Maximum resident set size: 1692 pages
% 0.14/0.41 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------