TSTP Solution File: KLE074+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : KLE074+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 01:55:44 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 1.40s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 13 ( 12 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 4 ( 4 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 0 sgn 16 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals,conjecture,
! [X4,X5,X6] : domain(multiplication(multiplication(X4,X5),domain(X6))) = domain(multiplication(X4,domain(multiplication(X5,domain(X6))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',goals) ).
fof(domain2,axiom,
! [X4,X5] : domain(multiplication(X4,X5)) = domain(multiplication(X4,domain(X5))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+5.ax',domain2) ).
fof(multiplicative_associativity,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_associativity) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X4,X5,X6] : domain(multiplication(multiplication(X4,X5),domain(X6))) = domain(multiplication(X4,domain(multiplication(X5,domain(X6))))),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
domain(multiplication(multiplication(esk1_0,esk2_0),domain(esk3_0))) != domain(multiplication(esk1_0,domain(multiplication(esk2_0,domain(esk3_0))))),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X6,X7] : domain(multiplication(X6,X7)) = domain(multiplication(X6,domain(X7))),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[domain2]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] : multiplication(X4,multiplication(X5,X6)) = multiplication(multiplication(X4,X5),X6),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_associativity]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
domain(multiplication(multiplication(esk1_0,esk2_0),domain(esk3_0))) != domain(multiplication(esk1_0,domain(multiplication(esk2_0,domain(esk3_0))))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
domain(multiplication(X1,X2)) = domain(multiplication(X1,domain(X2))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
domain(multiplication(esk1_0,multiplication(esk2_0,domain(esk3_0)))) != domain(multiplication(esk1_0,multiplication(esk2_0,esk3_0))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_8]),c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
domain(multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,domain(X3)))) = domain(multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_8]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : KLE074+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 09:30:23 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/1.40 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.22/1.40 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.22/1.40 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 0.22/1.40
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof found!
% 0.22/1.40 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/1.40 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object total steps : 13
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object clause steps : 6
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object formula steps : 7
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object conjectures : 6
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object initial clauses used : 3
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 0.22/1.40 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 6
% 0.22/1.40 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.22/1.40 # Parsed axioms : 18
% 0.22/1.40 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 8
% 0.22/1.40 # Initial clauses : 10
% 0.22/1.40 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Initial clauses in saturation : 10
% 0.22/1.40 # Processed clauses : 13
% 0.22/1.40 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # ...remaining for further processing : 13
% 0.22/1.40 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.22/1.40 # Generated clauses : 55
% 0.22/1.40 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 31
% 0.22/1.40 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Paramodulations : 55
% 0.22/1.40 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Current number of processed clauses : 11
% 0.22/1.40 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 10
% 0.22/1.40 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.22/1.40 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 28
% 0.22/1.40 # ...number of literals in the above : 28
% 0.22/1.40 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.22/1.40 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.22/1.40 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # BW rewrite match attempts : 17
% 0.22/1.40 # BW rewrite match successes : 14
% 0.22/1.40 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/1.40 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1046
% 0.22/1.40
% 0.22/1.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/1.40 # User time : 0.013 s
% 0.22/1.40 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.22/1.40 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.22/1.40 # Maximum resident set size: 2812 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------