TSTP Solution File: KLE063+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : KLE063+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 01:55:40 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 1.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   42 (  39 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   45 (  44 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    7 (   4   ~;   0   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   61 (   5 sgn  36   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(domain3,axiom,
    ! [X4] : addition(domain(X4),one) = one,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+5.ax',domain3) ).

fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(domain1,axiom,
    ! [X4] : addition(X4,multiplication(domain(X4),X4)) = multiplication(domain(X4),X4),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+5.ax',domain1) ).

fof(multiplicative_right_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

fof(domain5,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] : domain(addition(X4,X5)) = addition(domain(X4),domain(X5)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+5.ax',domain5) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( addition(X4,multiplication(domain(X5),X4)) = multiplication(domain(X5),X4)
     => addition(domain(X4),domain(X5)) = domain(X5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',goals) ).

fof(left_distributivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(addition(X1,X2),X3) = addition(multiplication(X1,X3),multiplication(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',left_distributivity) ).

fof(multiplicative_left_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_left_identity) ).

fof(domain2,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] : domain(multiplication(X4,X5)) = domain(multiplication(X4,domain(X5))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+5.ax',domain2) ).

fof(right_distributivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_distributivity) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X5] : addition(domain(X5),one) = one,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[domain3]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : addition(X3,X4) = addition(X4,X3),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X5] : addition(X5,multiplication(domain(X5),X5)) = multiplication(domain(X5),X5),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[domain1]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X2] : multiplication(X2,one) = X2,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_right_identity]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    addition(domain(X1),one) = one,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X6,X7] : domain(addition(X6,X7)) = addition(domain(X6),domain(X7)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[domain5]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    addition(X1,multiplication(domain(X1),X1)) = multiplication(domain(X1),X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    addition(one,domain(X1)) = one,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X4,X5] :
        ( addition(X4,multiplication(domain(X5),X4)) = multiplication(domain(X5),X4)
       => addition(domain(X4),domain(X5)) = domain(X5) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] : multiplication(addition(X4,X5),X6) = addition(multiplication(X4,X6),multiplication(X5,X6)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[left_distributivity]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X2] : multiplication(one,X2) = X2,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_left_identity]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X6,X7] : domain(multiplication(X6,X7)) = domain(multiplication(X6,domain(X7))),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[domain2]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    domain(addition(X1,X2)) = addition(domain(X1),domain(X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    domain(one) = one,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] : multiplication(X4,addition(X5,X6)) = addition(multiplication(X4,X5),multiplication(X4,X6)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[right_distributivity]) ).

fof(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( addition(esk1_0,multiplication(domain(esk2_0),esk1_0)) = multiplication(domain(esk2_0),esk1_0)
    & addition(domain(esk1_0),domain(esk2_0)) != domain(esk2_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    multiplication(addition(X1,X2),X3) = addition(multiplication(X1,X3),multiplication(X2,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    domain(multiplication(X1,X2)) = domain(multiplication(X1,domain(X2))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    domain(addition(one,X1)) = one,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    addition(esk1_0,multiplication(domain(esk2_0),esk1_0)) = multiplication(domain(esk2_0),esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    addition(X1,multiplication(domain(X2),X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_19]),c_0_29]),c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    domain(domain(X1)) = domain(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_29]),c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    addition(domain(esk1_0),domain(esk2_0)) != domain(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    domain(addition(X1,multiplication(X1,X2))) = domain(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_18]),c_0_32]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(domain(esk2_0),esk1_0) = esk1_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    domain(addition(domain(X1),X2)) = domain(addition(X1,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_35]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    domain(addition(esk1_0,esk2_0)) != domain(esk2_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_39]),c_0_35]),c_0_15]),c_0_40]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : KLE063+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 11:20:21 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/1.41  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.41  # Preprocessing time       : 0.014 s
% 0.23/1.41  
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.41  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.41  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object total steps             : 42
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object clause steps            : 21
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object formula steps           : 21
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object conjectures             : 8
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 5
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 11
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 10
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object generating inferences   : 7
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 16
% 0.23/1.41  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.41  # Parsed axioms                        : 18
% 0.23/1.41  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Initial clauses                      : 20
% 0.23/1.41  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 20
% 0.23/1.41  # Processed clauses                    : 145
% 0.23/1.41  # ...of these trivial                  : 44
% 0.23/1.41  # ...subsumed                          : 30
% 0.23/1.41  # ...remaining for further processing  : 70
% 0.23/1.41  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Backward-rewritten                   : 22
% 0.23/1.41  # Generated clauses                    : 1593
% 0.23/1.41  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 1059
% 0.23/1.41  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Paramodulations                      : 1593
% 0.23/1.41  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of processed clauses  : 48
% 0.23/1.41  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 41
% 0.23/1.41  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 0.23/1.41  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.23/1.41  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 440
% 0.23/1.41  # ...number of literals in the above   : 440
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of archived clauses   : 22
% 0.23/1.41  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 22
% 0.23/1.41  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 138
% 0.23/1.41  # BW rewrite match successes           : 85
% 0.23/1.41  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 23962
% 0.23/1.41  
% 0.23/1.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.41  # User time                : 0.033 s
% 0.23/1.41  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.23/1.41  # Total time               : 0.035 s
% 0.23/1.41  # Maximum resident set size: 3608 pages
% 0.23/23.41  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.42  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------