TSTP Solution File: KLE063+1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : KLE063+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 23:10:55 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   45 (  42 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   48 (  47 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    7 (   4   ~;   0   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   64 (   5 sgn  36   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(domain2,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] : domain(multiplication(X4,X5)) = domain(multiplication(X4,domain(X5))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+5.ax',domain2) ).

fof(multiplicative_left_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_left_identity) ).

fof(domain5,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] : domain(addition(X4,X5)) = addition(domain(X4),domain(X5)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+5.ax',domain5) ).

fof(domain3,axiom,
    ! [X4] : addition(domain(X4),one) = one,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+5.ax',domain3) ).

fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(domain1,axiom,
    ! [X4] : addition(X4,multiplication(domain(X4),X4)) = multiplication(domain(X4),X4),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+5.ax',domain1) ).

fof(multiplicative_right_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( addition(X4,multiplication(domain(X5),X4)) = multiplication(domain(X5),X4)
     => addition(domain(X4),domain(X5)) = domain(X5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(left_distributivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(addition(X1,X2),X3) = addition(multiplication(X1,X3),multiplication(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',left_distributivity) ).

fof(right_distributivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_distributivity) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X9,X10] : domain(multiplication(X9,X10)) = domain(multiplication(X9,domain(X10))),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[domain2]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X31] : multiplication(one,X31) = X31,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_left_identity]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X12,X13] : domain(addition(X12,X13)) = addition(domain(X12),domain(X13)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[domain5]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    domain(multiplication(X1,X2)) = domain(multiplication(X1,domain(X2))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X11] : addition(domain(X11),one) = one,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[domain3]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X14,X15] : addition(X14,X15) = addition(X15,X14),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    domain(addition(X1,X2)) = addition(domain(X1),domain(X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    domain(domain(X1)) = domain(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    addition(domain(X1),one) = one,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X8] : addition(X8,multiplication(domain(X8),X8)) = multiplication(domain(X8),X8),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[domain1]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X30] : multiplication(X30,one) = X30,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_right_identity]) ).

fof(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X4,X5] :
        ( addition(X4,multiplication(domain(X5),X4)) = multiplication(domain(X5),X4)
       => addition(domain(X4),domain(X5)) = domain(X5) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X24,X25,X26] : multiplication(addition(X24,X25),X26) = addition(multiplication(X24,X26),multiplication(X25,X26)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[left_distributivity]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    domain(addition(X1,domain(X2))) = domain(addition(X1,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    addition(one,domain(X1)) = one,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    addition(X1,multiplication(domain(X1),X1)) = multiplication(domain(X1),X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

fof(c_0_29,plain,
    ! [X21,X22,X23] : multiplication(X21,addition(X22,X23)) = addition(multiplication(X21,X22),multiplication(X21,X23)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[right_distributivity]) ).

fof(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( addition(esk1_0,multiplication(domain(esk2_0),esk1_0)) = multiplication(domain(esk2_0),esk1_0)
    & addition(domain(esk1_0),domain(esk2_0)) != domain(esk2_0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    multiplication(addition(X1,X2),X3) = addition(multiplication(X1,X3),multiplication(X2,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    domain(addition(one,X1)) = domain(one),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    domain(one) = one,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    addition(esk1_0,multiplication(domain(esk2_0),esk1_0)) = multiplication(domain(esk2_0),esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    addition(X1,multiplication(X2,X1)) = multiplication(addition(X2,one),X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_14]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    domain(addition(one,X1)) = one,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    addition(X1,multiplication(X1,X2)) = multiplication(X1,addition(X2,one)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_28]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(domain(esk2_0),esk1_0) = esk1_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_20]),c_0_26]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    addition(domain(esk1_0),domain(esk2_0)) != domain(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    domain(multiplication(X1,addition(one,X2))) = domain(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_37]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(domain(esk2_0),addition(one,esk1_0)) = addition(esk1_0,domain(esk2_0)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_20]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    domain(addition(esk1_0,esk2_0)) != domain(esk2_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_25]),c_0_18]),c_0_43]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem    : KLE063+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.04/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 09:48:08 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.51  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.51  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.53  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.21/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # sh5l with pid 25497 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.21/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.21/0.53  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S with 135s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S with pid 25503 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Result found by H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S
% 0.21/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.21/0.53  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S with 135s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.53  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.53  
% 0.21/0.53  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.53  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.53  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.53  # Parsed axioms                        : 18
% 0.21/0.53  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 1
% 0.21/0.53  # Initial clauses                      : 18
% 0.21/0.53  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 18
% 0.21/0.53  # Processed clauses                    : 133
% 0.21/0.53  # ...of these trivial                  : 36
% 0.21/0.53  # ...subsumed                          : 17
% 0.21/0.53  # ...remaining for further processing  : 80
% 0.21/0.53  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Backward-rewritten                   : 5
% 0.21/0.53  # Generated clauses                    : 1145
% 0.21/0.53  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 499
% 0.21/0.53  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Paramodulations                      : 1145
% 0.21/0.53  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Total rewrite steps                  : 1770
% 0.21/0.53  # ...of those cached                   : 1262
% 0.21/0.53  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  # Current number of processed clauses  : 57
% 0.21/0.53  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 55
% 0.21/0.53  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.21/0.53  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.21/0.53  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 386
% 0.21/0.53  # ...number of literals in the above   : 386
% 0.21/0.53  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Current number of archived clauses   : 23
% 0.21/0.53  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 40
% 0.21/0.53  # BW rewrite match successes           : 19
% 0.21/0.53  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 10663
% 0.21/0.53  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 35
% 0.21/0.53  
% 0.21/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53  # User time                : 0.013 s
% 0.21/0.53  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.53  # Total time               : 0.016 s
% 0.21/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 1748 pages
% 0.21/0.53  
% 0.21/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53  # User time                : 0.014 s
% 0.21/0.53  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.53  # Total time               : 0.020 s
% 0.21/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages
% 0.21/0.53  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.54  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------