TSTP Solution File: KLE061+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : KLE061+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 01:49:55 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.41s 2.35s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.41s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   20 (  20 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   20 (  19 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_12,plain,
    addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X3,X2)) = multiplication(addition(X1,X3),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o20p32b0/input.p',i_0_12) ).

cnf(i_0_14,plain,
    multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o20p32b0/input.p',i_0_14) ).

cnf(i_0_2,plain,
    addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o20p32b0/input.p',i_0_2) ).

cnf(i_0_7,plain,
    addition(domain(X1),one) = one,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o20p32b0/input.p',i_0_7) ).

cnf(i_0_5,plain,
    addition(X1,multiplication(domain(X1),X1)) = multiplication(domain(X1),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o20p32b0/input.p',i_0_5) ).

cnf(i_0_6,plain,
    domain(multiplication(X1,domain(X2))) = domain(multiplication(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o20p32b0/input.p',i_0_6) ).

cnf(i_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(domain(esk1_0),domain(esk1_0)) != domain(esk1_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o20p32b0/input.p',i_0_10) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X3,X2)) = multiplication(addition(X1,X3),X2),
    i_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
    i_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    i_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    addition(domain(X1),one) = one,
    i_0_7 ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    addition(X1,multiplication(domain(X1),X1)) = multiplication(domain(X1),X1),
    i_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    addition(X1,multiplication(X2,X1)) = multiplication(addition(X2,one),X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    addition(one,domain(X1)) = one,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    domain(multiplication(X1,domain(X2))) = domain(multiplication(X1,X2)),
    i_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    multiplication(domain(X1),X1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_24]),c_0_28]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    domain(domain(X1)) = domain(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_23]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(domain(esk1_0),domain(esk1_0)) != domain(esk1_0),
    i_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    multiplication(domain(X1),domain(X1)) = domain(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : KLE061+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 12:05:09 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.44  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.44  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.19/0.44  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.19/0.44  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.41/2.35  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 7.41/2.35  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 7.41/2.35  # Preprocessing time       : 0.009 s
% 7.41/2.35  
% 7.41/2.35  # Proof found!
% 7.41/2.35  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.41/2.35  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.41/2.35  # Proof object total steps             : 20
% 7.41/2.35  # Proof object clause steps            : 13
% 7.41/2.35  # Proof object formula steps           : 7
% 7.41/2.35  # Proof object conjectures             : 3
% 7.41/2.35  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
% 7.41/2.35  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 1
% 7.41/2.35  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 7
% 7.41/2.35  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 7
% 7.41/2.35  # Proof object generating inferences   : 3
% 7.41/2.35  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 9
% 7.41/2.35  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.41/2.35  # Parsed axioms                        : 19
% 7.41/2.35  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 7.41/2.35  # Initial clauses                      : 19
% 7.41/2.35  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 7.41/2.35  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 19
% 7.41/2.35  # Processed clauses                    : 117
% 7.41/2.35  # ...of these trivial                  : 38
% 7.41/2.35  # ...subsumed                          : 27
% 7.41/2.35  # ...remaining for further processing  : 52
% 7.41/2.35  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 7.41/2.35  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 7.41/2.35  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 7.41/2.35  # Backward-rewritten                   : 5
% 7.41/2.35  # Generated clauses                    : 1162
% 7.41/2.35  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 634
% 7.41/2.35  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 7.41/2.35  # Paramodulations                      : 1162
% 7.41/2.35  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 7.41/2.35  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 7.41/2.35  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 7.41/2.35  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 7.41/2.35  # Current number of processed clauses  : 47
% 7.41/2.35  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 42
% 7.41/2.35  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 7.41/2.35  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 7.41/2.35  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
% 7.41/2.35  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 418
% 7.41/2.35  # ...number of literals in the above   : 418
% 7.41/2.35  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 7.41/2.35  # Current number of archived clauses   : 5
% 7.41/2.35  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 7.41/2.35  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 7.41/2.35  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 7.41/2.35  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9
% 7.41/2.35  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 7.41/2.35  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 83
% 7.41/2.35  # BW rewrite match successes           : 39
% 7.41/2.35  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 7.41/2.35  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 7.41/2.35  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 12085
% 7.41/2.35  
% 7.41/2.35  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.41/2.35  # User time                : 0.011 s
% 7.41/2.35  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 7.41/2.35  # Total time               : 0.017 s
% 7.41/2.35  # ...preprocessing         : 0.009 s
% 7.41/2.35  # ...main loop             : 0.008 s
% 7.41/2.35  # Maximum resident set size: 7132 pages
% 7.41/2.35  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------