TSTP Solution File: KLE044-10 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : KLE044-10 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 01:56:48 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 44.19s 6.00s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 44.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : KLE044-10 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 13:30:50 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.37  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.37  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.12/0.37  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 0.12/0.37  #
% 0.12/0.37  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.37  # Number of axioms: 21 Number of unprocessed: 21
% 0.12/0.37  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.12/0.37  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.12/0.37  # Hello from C++
% 0.12/0.37  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.12/0.37  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.12/0.37  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.12/0.37  # 21 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.12/0.37  # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.12/0.37  # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.12/0.37  # Found 21 unit axioms.
% 0.12/0.37  # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.12/0.37  # 0 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.12/0.37  # 21 unit axiom clauses
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.12/0.37  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.12/0.37  # Creating equality axioms
% 0.12/0.37  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.12/0.37  # Returning from population with 43 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.12/0.37  # We now have 43 tableaux to operate on
% 44.19/6.00  # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 44.19/6.00  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 44.19/6.00  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 44.19/6.00  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 44.19/6.00  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 44.19/6.00  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 44.19/6.00  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 44.19/6.00  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 44.19/6.00  # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 44.19/6.00  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 44.19/6.00  # Begin clausification derivation
% 44.19/6.00  
% 44.19/6.00  # End clausification derivation
% 44.19/6.00  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 44.19/6.00  cnf(i_0_27, plain, (addition(X1,zero)=X1)).
% 44.19/6.00  cnf(i_0_34, plain, (multiplication(X1,zero)=zero)).
% 44.19/6.00  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (multiplication(zero,X1)=zero)).
% 44.19/6.00  cnf(i_0_30, plain, (multiplication(X1,one)=X1)).
% 44.19/6.00  cnf(i_0_31, plain, (multiplication(one,X1)=X1)).
% 44.19/6.00  cnf(i_0_28, plain, (addition(X1,X1)=X1)).
% 44.19/6.00  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (ifeq3(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 44.19/6.00  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (ifeq2(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 44.19/6.00  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (addition(addition(X1,X2),X3)=addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)))).
% 44.19/6.00  cnf(i_0_29, plain, (multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3)=multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)))).
% 44.19/6.00  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 44.19/6.00  cnf(i_0_38, plain, (leq(addition(one,multiplication(X1,star(X1))),star(X1))=true)).
% 44.19/6.00  cnf(i_0_39, plain, (leq(addition(one,multiplication(star(X1),X1)),star(X1))=true)).
% 44.19/6.00  cnf(i_0_37, plain, (ifeq3(addition(X1,X2),X2,leq(X1,X2),true)=true)).
% 44.19/6.00  cnf(i_0_32, plain, (addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3))=multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)))).
% 44.19/6.00  cnf(i_0_36, plain, (ifeq2(leq(X1,X2),true,addition(X1,X2),X2)=X2)).
% 44.19/6.00  cnf(i_0_33, plain, (addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X3,X2))=multiplication(addition(X1,X3),X2))).
% 44.19/6.00  cnf(i_0_41, plain, (ifeq(leq(addition(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),X1),true,leq(multiplication(X3,star(X2)),X1),true)=true)).
% 44.19/6.00  cnf(i_0_40, plain, (ifeq(leq(addition(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),X2),true,leq(multiplication(star(X1),X3),X2),true)=true)).
% 44.19/6.00  cnf(i_0_25, plain, (addition(X1,X2)=addition(X2,X1))).
% 44.19/6.00  cnf(i_0_42, negated_conjecture, (tuple(leq(star(addition(one,sK2_goals_X0)),star(sK2_goals_X0)),leq(star(sK1_goals_X0),star(addition(one,sK1_goals_X0))))!=tuple(true,true))).
% 44.19/6.00  cnf(i_0_44, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 44.19/6.00  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 44.19/6.00  # Begin printing tableau
% 44.19/6.00  # Found 9 steps
% 44.19/6.00  cnf(i_0_27, plain, (addition(X3,zero)=X3), inference(start_rule)).
% 44.19/6.00  cnf(i_0_56, plain, (addition(X3,zero)=X3), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_54])).
% 44.19/6.00  cnf(i_0_109, plain, (star(addition(X3,zero))=star(X3)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_47])).
% 44.19/6.00  cnf(i_0_120, plain, (addition(star(X3),zero)!=star(X3)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_27])).
% 44.19/6.00  cnf(i_0_118, plain, (star(addition(X3,zero))=addition(star(X3),zero)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_48])).
% 44.19/6.00  cnf(i_0_538085, plain, (addition(X5,zero)!=X5), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_27])).
% 44.19/6.00  cnf(i_0_538086, plain, (addition(X15,zero)!=X15), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_27])).
% 44.19/6.00  cnf(i_0_538087, plain, (addition(X17,zero)!=X17), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_27])).
% 44.19/6.00  cnf(i_0_538083, plain, (ifeq3(star(addition(X3,zero)),addition(X5,zero),addition(X15,zero),addition(X17,zero))=ifeq3(addition(star(X3),zero),X5,X15,X17)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_538083, ...])).
% 44.19/6.00  # End printing tableau
% 44.19/6.00  # SZS output end
% 44.19/6.00  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 44.93/6.02  # Child (19193) has found a proof.
% 44.93/6.02  
% 44.93/6.02  # Proof search is over...
% 44.93/6.02  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------