TSTP Solution File: KLE037+1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : KLE037+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:26:19 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.39s 0.59s
% Output   : Refutation 0.39s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (   8 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   12 (   5 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
    addition(X,X) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE002+0.ax',additive_idempotence) ).

cnf(3,plain,
    addition(X,addition(X,Y)) = addition(X,Y),
    inference('EMBED',[status(thm)],[2]) ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    ( ~ leq(X,Y)
    | addition(X,Y) = Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE002+0.ax',order) ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    ( leq(X,Y)
    | addition(X,Y) != Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE002+0.ax',order) ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    leq(addition(one,multiplication(X,star(X))),star(X)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE002+0.ax',star_unfold_right) ).

cnf(17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(one,star('SKOLEMAAAV1')),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

cnf(20,plain,
    leq(X,addition(X,Y)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[12,3]) ).

cnf(27,plain,
    addition(one,addition(multiplication(X,star(X)),star(X))) = star(X),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[11,13]) ).

cnf(112,plain,
    leq(one,star(X)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[20,27,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(113,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[17,112]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : KLE037+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 09:29:52 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.46   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.46   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  "."
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-16T09:29:52
% 0.19/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n008.cluster.edu at 2022-06-16T09:29:52
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (= (|addition| ?X ?Y) (|addition| ?Y ?X)).
% 0.19/0.48  ; Recognized associativity assertion (= (|addition| ?X (|addition| ?Y ?Z)) (|addition| (|addition| ?X ?Y) ?Z)).
% 0.19/0.48  ; Recognized right identity assertion (= (|addition| ?X |zero|) ?X).
% 0.19/0.48  ; Recognized associativity assertion (= (|multiplication| ?X (|multiplication| ?Y ?Z)) (|multiplication| (|multiplication| ?X ?Y) ?Z)).
% 0.19/0.48  ; Recognized right identity assertion (= (|multiplication| ?X |one|) ?X).
% 0.19/0.48  ; Recognized left identity assertion (= (|multiplication| |one| ?X) ?X).
% 0.19/0.48  ; Declaring addition to be commutative.
% 0.39/0.59  ; Declaring addition to be associative-commutative.
% 0.39/0.59  
% 0.39/0.59  #||
% 0.39/0.59  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/0.59  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.39/0.59  ||#
% 0.39/0.59  
% 0.39/0.59  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.39/0.59  ;       737 formulas have been input or derived (from 43 formulas).
% 0.39/0.59  ;       113 (15%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.39/0.59  ;           31 (27%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.39/0.59  ;           82 (73%) are still being kept.
% 0.39/0.59  ; 
% 0.39/0.59  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.39/0.59  ;     0.004   3%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.39/0.59  ;     0.001   1%   Assert                       (17 calls)
% 0.39/0.59  ;     0.007   6%   Process new row              (640 calls)
% 0.39/0.59  ;     0.006   5%   Resolution                   (84 calls)
% 0.39/0.59  ;     0.013  11%   Paramodulation               (42 calls)
% 0.39/0.59  ;     0.000   0%   Embedding                    (15 calls)
% 0.39/0.59  ;     0.010   8%   Condensing                   (120 calls)
% 0.39/0.59  ;     0.002   2%   Forward subsumption          (120 calls)
% 0.39/0.59  ;     0.001   1%   Backward subsumption         (45 calls)
% 0.39/0.59  ;     0.004   3%   Clause clause subsumption    (200 calls)
% 0.39/0.59  ;     0.039  32%   Forward simplification       (622 calls)
% 0.39/0.59  ;     0.002   2%   Backward simplification      (101 calls)
% 0.39/0.59  ;     0.005   4%   Ordering                     (428 calls)
% 0.39/0.59  ;     0.000   0%   Ordering ac                  (61 calls)
% 0.39/0.59  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.39/0.59  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.39/0.59  ;     0.027  22%   Other
% 0.39/0.59  ;     0.121        Total
% 0.39/0.59  ;     0.123        Real time
% 0.39/0.59  ; 
% 0.39/0.59  ; Term-hash-array has 293 terms in all.
% 0.39/0.59  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 37 entries (43 at peak, 45 added, 8 deleted).
% 0.39/0.59  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 165 nodes (237 at peak, 244 added, 79 deleted).
% 0.39/0.59  ;  Retrieved 242 possibly forward subsuming rows in 120 calls.
% 0.39/0.59  ;  Retrieved 16 possibly backward subsumed rows in 45 calls.
% 0.39/0.59  ; Path-index has 242 entries (287 at peak, 297 added, 55 deleted).
% 0.39/0.59  ; Path-index has 292 nodes (316 at peak, 318 added, 26 deleted).
% 0.39/0.59  ; Trie-index has 242 entries (287 at peak, 297 added, 55 deleted).
% 0.39/0.59  ; Trie-index has 245 nodes (275 at peak, 280 added, 35 deleted).
% 0.39/0.59  ; Retrieved 16,639 generalization terms in 3,705 calls.
% 0.39/0.59  ; Retrieved 109 instance terms in 73 calls.
% 0.39/0.59  ; Retrieved 1,529 unifiable terms in 257 calls.
% 0.39/0.59  ; 
% 0.39/0.59  ; The agenda of rows to process has 43 entries:
% 0.39/0.59  ;     2 with value 9               1 with value 18               2 with value 25
% 0.39/0.59  ;     1 with value 10              1 with value 19               8 with value 26
% 0.39/0.59  ;     3 with value 12              2 with value 21               2 with value 28
% 0.39/0.59  ;     2 with value 14              4 with value 22               1 with value 29
% 0.39/0.59  ;     3 with value 15              2 with value 23               1 with value 30
% 0.39/0.59  ;     2 with value 16              2 with value 24               1 with value 32
% 0.39/0.59  ;     3 with value 17
% 0.39/0.59  ; The agenda of rows to give has 49 entries:
% 0.39/0.59  ;     1 with value (4 8)           3 with value (4 21)           5 with value (4 27)
% 0.39/0.59  ;     7 with value (4 17)          1 with value (4 22)          13 with value (4 28)
% 0.39/0.59  ;     4 with value (4 18)          1 with value (4 25)           1 with value (4 29)
% 0.39/0.59  ;     2 with value (4 19)          4 with value (4 26)           2 with value (4 35)
% 0.39/0.59  ;     5 with value (4 20)
% 0.39/0.59  Evaluation took:
% 0.39/0.59    0.123 seconds of real time
% 0.39/0.59    0.110164 seconds of user run time
% 0.39/0.59    0.012873 seconds of system run time
% 0.39/0.59    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.39/0.59    0 page faults and
% 0.39/0.59    7,317,328 bytes consed.
% 0.39/0.59  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.39/0.59  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-16T09:29:52
% 0.39/0.59  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.39/0.59  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------