TSTP Solution File: KLE037+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : KLE037+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 01:55:31 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.25s 1.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (  21 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   31 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   14 (   8   ~;   4   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   37 (   2 sgn  22   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X4] : leq(one,star(X4)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',goals) ).

fof(additive_associativity,axiom,
    ! [X3,X2,X1] : addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(addition(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE002+0.ax',additive_associativity) ).

fof(additive_idempotence,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE002+0.ax',additive_idempotence) ).

fof(order,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( leq(X1,X2)
    <=> addition(X1,X2) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE002+0.ax',order) ).

fof(star_unfold_right,axiom,
    ! [X1] : leq(addition(one,multiplication(X1,star(X1))),star(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE002+0.ax',star_unfold_right) ).

fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE002+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X4] : leq(one,star(X4)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] : addition(X6,addition(X5,X4)) = addition(addition(X6,X5),X4),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_associativity]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X2] : addition(X2,X2) = X2,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_idempotence]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X3,X4,X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ leq(X3,X4)
        | addition(X3,X4) = X4 )
      & ( addition(X3,X4) != X4
        | leq(X3,X4) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[order])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X2] : leq(addition(one,multiplication(X2,star(X2))),star(X2)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[star_unfold_right]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : addition(X3,X4) = addition(X4,X3),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(one,star(esk1_0)),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(addition(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( addition(X1,X2) = X2
    | ~ leq(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    leq(addition(one,multiplication(X1,star(X1))),star(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(one,star(esk1_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | addition(X1,X2) != X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    addition(X1,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    addition(one,addition(star(X1),multiplication(X1,star(X1)))) = star(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_13]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    addition(one,star(esk1_0)) != star(esk1_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    addition(one,star(X1)) = star(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : KLE037+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 09:39:20 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.25/1.44  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/1.44  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.25/1.44  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 0.25/1.44  
% 0.25/1.44  # Proof found!
% 0.25/1.44  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/1.44  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/1.44  # Proof object total steps             : 25
% 0.25/1.44  # Proof object clause steps            : 12
% 0.25/1.44  # Proof object formula steps           : 13
% 0.25/1.44  # Proof object conjectures             : 6
% 0.25/1.44  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 3
% 0.25/1.44  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.25/1.44  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 7
% 0.25/1.44  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 6
% 0.25/1.44  # Proof object generating inferences   : 4
% 0.25/1.44  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 4
% 0.25/1.44  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.25/1.44  # Parsed axioms                        : 17
% 0.25/1.44  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 3
% 0.25/1.44  # Initial clauses                      : 15
% 0.25/1.44  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.25/1.44  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 15
% 0.25/1.44  # Processed clauses                    : 29
% 0.25/1.44  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.25/1.44  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.25/1.44  # ...remaining for further processing  : 28
% 0.25/1.44  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.25/1.44  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.25/1.44  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.25/1.44  # Backward-rewritten                   : 3
% 0.25/1.44  # Generated clauses                    : 119
% 0.25/1.44  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 83
% 0.25/1.44  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.25/1.44  # Paramodulations                      : 119
% 0.25/1.44  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.25/1.44  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.25/1.44  # Current number of processed clauses  : 25
% 0.25/1.44  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 15
% 0.25/1.44  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.25/1.44  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.25/1.44  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 8
% 0.25/1.44  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 69
% 0.25/1.44  # ...number of literals in the above   : 110
% 0.25/1.44  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.25/1.44  # Current number of archived clauses   : 3
% 0.25/1.44  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 9
% 0.25/1.44  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9
% 0.25/1.44  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.25/1.44  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.25/1.44  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.25/1.44  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 10
% 0.25/1.44  # BW rewrite match successes           : 5
% 0.25/1.44  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.25/1.44  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.25/1.44  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1867
% 0.25/1.44  
% 0.25/1.44  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/1.44  # User time                : 0.016 s
% 0.25/1.44  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.25/1.44  # Total time               : 0.017 s
% 0.25/1.44  # Maximum resident set size: 2816 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------