TSTP Solution File: KLE035+1 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : KLE035+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:34:19 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 8.14s 1.81s
% Output   : Proof 13.40s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : KLE035+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.14/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 11:49:38 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.61  ________       _____
% 0.21/0.61  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.21/0.61  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.21/0.61  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.21/0.61  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.21/0.61  
% 0.21/0.61  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.21/0.61  (2023-06-19)
% 0.21/0.61  
% 0.21/0.61  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.21/0.61  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.21/0.61                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.21/0.61  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.21/0.61  
% 0.21/0.61  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.21/0.61  
% 0.21/0.61  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.21/0.63  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.21/0.64  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.21/0.64  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.21/0.64  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.21/0.64  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.21/0.64  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.21/0.64  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.21/0.64  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 2.15/1.03  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.15/1.03  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.81/1.07  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.81/1.07  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.81/1.07  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.81/1.07  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.81/1.07  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 4.94/1.40  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.94/1.41  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 4.94/1.42  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.94/1.43  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 5.62/1.46  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 5.62/1.46  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.34/1.56  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 8.14/1.81  Prover 0: proved (1166ms)
% 8.14/1.81  
% 8.14/1.81  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.14/1.81  
% 8.14/1.81  Prover 3: stopped
% 8.14/1.82  Prover 2: stopped
% 8.14/1.82  Prover 5: stopped
% 8.14/1.83  Prover 6: stopped
% 8.14/1.83  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 8.14/1.83  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 8.14/1.83  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 8.14/1.84  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 8.14/1.84  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 8.57/1.86  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 8.57/1.87  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 8.57/1.87  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 8.57/1.88  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 8.57/1.89  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 8.81/1.93  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 8.81/1.94  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.46/1.98  Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 9.46/1.99  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.46/1.99  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.46/2.00  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.78/2.02  Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.98/2.09  Prover 10: gave up
% 9.98/2.10  Prover 16: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=completeFrugal -randomSeed=-2043353683
% 9.98/2.11  Prover 16: Preprocessing ...
% 11.01/2.21  Prover 16: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 11.01/2.23  Prover 16: Constructing countermodel ...
% 12.14/2.34  Prover 13: gave up
% 12.33/2.35  Prover 19: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=-1780594085
% 12.33/2.37  Prover 19: Preprocessing ...
% 12.95/2.43  Prover 11: Found proof (size 83)
% 12.95/2.43  Prover 11: proved (593ms)
% 12.95/2.43  Prover 7: stopped
% 12.95/2.43  Prover 8: stopped
% 12.95/2.43  Prover 4: stopped
% 12.95/2.43  Prover 1: stopped
% 12.95/2.43  Prover 16: stopped
% 12.95/2.43  Prover 19: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 12.95/2.44  Prover 19: Constructing countermodel ...
% 12.95/2.44  Prover 19: stopped
% 12.95/2.44  
% 12.95/2.44  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 12.95/2.44  
% 12.95/2.45  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 12.95/2.45  Assumptions after simplification:
% 12.95/2.45  ---------------------------------
% 12.95/2.45  
% 12.95/2.45    (additive_associativity)
% 12.95/2.48     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : ( ~
% 12.95/2.48      (addition(v3, v0) = v4) |  ~ (addition(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1)
% 12.95/2.48      |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v5: $i] : (addition(v2, v5) = v4 & addition(v1, v0) = v5 &
% 12.95/2.48        $i(v5) & $i(v4))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i]
% 12.95/2.48    :  ! [v4: $i] : ( ~ (addition(v2, v3) = v4) |  ~ (addition(v1, v0) = v3) |  ~
% 12.95/2.48      $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v5: $i] : (addition(v5, v0) = v4 &
% 12.95/2.48        addition(v2, v1) = v5 & $i(v5) & $i(v4)))
% 12.95/2.48  
% 12.95/2.48    (additive_commutativity)
% 12.95/2.48     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (addition(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~
% 12.95/2.48      $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | (addition(v0, v1) = v2 & $i(v2))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 12.95/2.48    [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (addition(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |
% 12.95/2.48      (addition(v1, v0) = v2 & $i(v2)))
% 12.95/2.48  
% 12.95/2.48    (additive_identity)
% 12.95/2.48    $i(zero) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (addition(v0, zero) = v1)
% 12.95/2.48      |  ~ $i(v0))
% 12.95/2.48  
% 12.95/2.48    (goals)
% 12.95/2.48    $i(zero) &  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i]
% 12.95/2.48    :  ? [v5: $i] :  ? [v6: $i] :  ? [v7: $i] :  ? [v8: $i] :  ? [v9: $i] :  ?
% 12.95/2.48    [v10: $i] :  ? [v11: $i] :  ? [v12: int] : ( ~ (v12 = 0) & c(v3) = v5 &
% 12.95/2.48      test(v3) = 0 & test(v2) = 0 & leq(v11, zero) = v12 & leq(v8, zero) = 0 &
% 12.95/2.48      leq(v6, zero) = 0 & multiplication(v10, v5) = v11 & multiplication(v7, v5) =
% 12.95/2.48      v8 & multiplication(v4, v5) = v6 & multiplication(v2, v9) = v10 &
% 12.95/2.48      multiplication(v2, v1) = v7 & multiplication(v2, v0) = v4 & addition(v0, v1)
% 12.95/2.48      = v9 & $i(v11) & $i(v10) & $i(v9) & $i(v8) & $i(v7) & $i(v6) & $i(v5) &
% 12.95/2.48      $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 12.95/2.48  
% 12.95/2.48    (left_distributivity)
% 12.95/2.49     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] :  ! [v5:
% 12.95/2.49      $i] : ( ~ (multiplication(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (multiplication(v0, v2) = v3) |
% 12.95/2.49       ~ (addition(v3, v4) = v5) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v6: $i]
% 12.95/2.49      : (multiplication(v6, v2) = v5 & addition(v0, v1) = v6 & $i(v6) & $i(v5))) &
% 12.95/2.49     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : ( ~
% 12.95/2.49      (multiplication(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ (addition(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~
% 12.95/2.49      $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v5: $i] :  ? [v6: $i] : (multiplication(v1, v2) =
% 12.95/2.49        v6 & multiplication(v0, v2) = v5 & addition(v5, v6) = v4 & $i(v6) & $i(v5)
% 12.95/2.49        & $i(v4)))
% 12.95/2.49  
% 12.95/2.49    (multiplicative_associativity)
% 12.95/2.49     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : ( ~
% 12.95/2.49      (multiplication(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ (multiplication(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ $i(v2)
% 12.95/2.49      |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v5: $i] : (multiplication(v1, v2) = v5 &
% 12.95/2.49        multiplication(v0, v5) = v4 & $i(v5) & $i(v4))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1:
% 12.95/2.49      $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : ( ~ (multiplication(v1, v2)
% 12.95/2.49        = v3) |  ~ (multiplication(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 12.95/2.49      $i(v0) |  ? [v5: $i] : (multiplication(v5, v2) = v4 & multiplication(v0, v1)
% 12.95/2.49        = v5 & $i(v5) & $i(v4)))
% 12.95/2.49  
% 12.95/2.49    (order)
% 12.95/2.49     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (addition(v0, v1) =
% 12.95/2.49        v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & leq(v0, v1) =
% 12.95/2.49        v3)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v0,
% 12.95/2.49          v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: $i] : ( ~ (v3 = v1) &
% 12.95/2.49        addition(v0, v1) = v3 & $i(v3))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~
% 12.95/2.49      (leq(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | addition(v0, v1) = v1) &  ! [v0:
% 12.95/2.49      $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (addition(v0, v1) = v1) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |
% 12.95/2.49      leq(v0, v1) = 0)
% 12.95/2.49  
% 12.95/2.49    (right_distributivity)
% 12.95/2.49     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] :  ! [v5:
% 12.95/2.49      $i] : ( ~ (multiplication(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (multiplication(v0, v1) = v3) |
% 12.95/2.49       ~ (addition(v3, v4) = v5) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v6: $i]
% 12.95/2.49      : (multiplication(v0, v6) = v5 & addition(v1, v2) = v6 & $i(v6) & $i(v5))) &
% 12.95/2.49     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : ( ~
% 12.95/2.49      (multiplication(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (addition(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~
% 12.95/2.49      $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v5: $i] :  ? [v6: $i] : (multiplication(v0, v2) =
% 12.95/2.49        v6 & multiplication(v0, v1) = v5 & addition(v5, v6) = v4 & $i(v6) & $i(v5)
% 12.95/2.49        & $i(v4)))
% 12.95/2.49  
% 12.95/2.49    (function-axioms)
% 12.95/2.49     ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  !
% 12.95/2.49    [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (complement(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (complement(v3, v2) =
% 12.95/2.49        v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2:
% 12.95/2.49      $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (leq(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (leq(v3, v2) =
% 12.95/2.49        v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | 
% 12.95/2.49      ~ (multiplication(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (multiplication(v3, v2) = v0)) &  !
% 12.95/2.49    [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 12.95/2.49      (addition(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (addition(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 12.95/2.49    [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (c(v2) = v1) |  ~ (c(v2) = v0)) &  !
% 12.95/2.49    [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0
% 12.95/2.49      |  ~ (test(v2) = v1) |  ~ (test(v2) = v0))
% 12.95/2.49  
% 12.95/2.49  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 12.95/2.49  --------------------------------------------
% 12.95/2.49  additive_idempotence, left_annihilation, multiplicative_left_identity,
% 12.95/2.49  multiplicative_right_identity, right_annihilation, test_1, test_2, test_3,
% 12.95/2.49  test_4
% 12.95/2.49  
% 12.95/2.49  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 12.95/2.49  ---------------------------------
% 12.95/2.49  
% 12.95/2.49  Begin of proof
% 12.95/2.50  | 
% 12.95/2.50  | ALPHA: (additive_commutativity) implies:
% 12.95/2.50  |   (1)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (addition(v1, v0) = v2) |
% 12.95/2.50  |           ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | (addition(v0, v1) = v2 & $i(v2)))
% 12.95/2.50  | 
% 12.95/2.50  | ALPHA: (additive_associativity) implies:
% 12.95/2.50  |   (2)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : (
% 12.95/2.50  |          ~ (addition(v2, v3) = v4) |  ~ (addition(v1, v0) = v3) |  ~ $i(v2) | 
% 12.95/2.50  |          ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v5: $i] : (addition(v5, v0) = v4 &
% 12.95/2.50  |            addition(v2, v1) = v5 & $i(v5) & $i(v4)))
% 12.95/2.50  | 
% 12.95/2.50  | ALPHA: (additive_identity) implies:
% 12.95/2.50  |   (3)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (addition(v0, zero) = v1) | 
% 12.95/2.50  |          ~ $i(v0))
% 12.95/2.50  | 
% 12.95/2.50  | ALPHA: (multiplicative_associativity) implies:
% 12.95/2.50  |   (4)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : (
% 12.95/2.50  |          ~ (multiplication(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ (multiplication(v0, v1) = v3) | 
% 12.95/2.50  |          ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v5: $i] : (multiplication(v1,
% 12.95/2.50  |              v2) = v5 & multiplication(v0, v5) = v4 & $i(v5) & $i(v4)))
% 12.95/2.50  | 
% 12.95/2.50  | ALPHA: (right_distributivity) implies:
% 12.95/2.50  |   (5)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : (
% 12.95/2.50  |          ~ (multiplication(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (addition(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~
% 12.95/2.50  |          $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v5: $i] :  ? [v6: $i] :
% 12.95/2.50  |          (multiplication(v0, v2) = v6 & multiplication(v0, v1) = v5 &
% 12.95/2.50  |            addition(v5, v6) = v4 & $i(v6) & $i(v5) & $i(v4)))
% 12.95/2.50  | 
% 12.95/2.50  | ALPHA: (left_distributivity) implies:
% 12.95/2.50  |   (6)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : (
% 12.95/2.50  |          ~ (multiplication(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ (addition(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~
% 12.95/2.50  |          $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v5: $i] :  ? [v6: $i] :
% 12.95/2.50  |          (multiplication(v1, v2) = v6 & multiplication(v0, v2) = v5 &
% 12.95/2.50  |            addition(v5, v6) = v4 & $i(v6) & $i(v5) & $i(v4)))
% 12.95/2.50  | 
% 12.95/2.50  | ALPHA: (order) implies:
% 12.95/2.50  |   (7)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (leq(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 12.95/2.50  |          $i(v0) | addition(v0, v1) = v1)
% 12.95/2.50  |   (8)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v0, v1) =
% 12.95/2.50  |            v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: $i] : ( ~ (v3 = v1) &
% 12.95/2.50  |            addition(v0, v1) = v3 & $i(v3)))
% 12.95/2.50  | 
% 12.95/2.50  | ALPHA: (goals) implies:
% 12.95/2.50  |   (9)  $i(zero)
% 12.95/2.51  |   (10)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] : 
% 12.95/2.51  |         ? [v5: $i] :  ? [v6: $i] :  ? [v7: $i] :  ? [v8: $i] :  ? [v9: $i] : 
% 12.95/2.51  |         ? [v10: $i] :  ? [v11: $i] :  ? [v12: int] : ( ~ (v12 = 0) & c(v3) =
% 12.95/2.51  |           v5 & test(v3) = 0 & test(v2) = 0 & leq(v11, zero) = v12 & leq(v8,
% 12.95/2.51  |             zero) = 0 & leq(v6, zero) = 0 & multiplication(v10, v5) = v11 &
% 12.95/2.51  |           multiplication(v7, v5) = v8 & multiplication(v4, v5) = v6 &
% 12.95/2.51  |           multiplication(v2, v9) = v10 & multiplication(v2, v1) = v7 &
% 12.95/2.51  |           multiplication(v2, v0) = v4 & addition(v0, v1) = v9 & $i(v11) &
% 12.95/2.51  |           $i(v10) & $i(v9) & $i(v8) & $i(v7) & $i(v6) & $i(v5) & $i(v4) &
% 12.95/2.51  |           $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 12.95/2.51  | 
% 12.95/2.51  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 12.95/2.51  |   (11)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 12.95/2.51  |           (addition(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (addition(v3, v2) = v0))
% 12.95/2.51  |   (12)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 12.95/2.51  |           (multiplication(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (multiplication(v3, v2) = v0))
% 12.95/2.51  | 
% 12.95/2.51  | DELTA: instantiating (10) with fresh symbols all_20_0, all_20_1, all_20_2,
% 12.95/2.51  |        all_20_3, all_20_4, all_20_5, all_20_6, all_20_7, all_20_8, all_20_9,
% 12.95/2.51  |        all_20_10, all_20_11, all_20_12 gives:
% 12.95/2.51  |   (13)   ~ (all_20_0 = 0) & c(all_20_9) = all_20_7 & test(all_20_9) = 0 &
% 12.95/2.51  |         test(all_20_10) = 0 & leq(all_20_1, zero) = all_20_0 & leq(all_20_4,
% 12.95/2.51  |           zero) = 0 & leq(all_20_6, zero) = 0 & multiplication(all_20_2,
% 12.95/2.51  |           all_20_7) = all_20_1 & multiplication(all_20_5, all_20_7) = all_20_4
% 12.95/2.51  |         & multiplication(all_20_8, all_20_7) = all_20_6 &
% 12.95/2.51  |         multiplication(all_20_10, all_20_3) = all_20_2 &
% 12.95/2.51  |         multiplication(all_20_10, all_20_11) = all_20_5 &
% 12.95/2.51  |         multiplication(all_20_10, all_20_12) = all_20_8 & addition(all_20_12,
% 12.95/2.51  |           all_20_11) = all_20_3 & $i(all_20_1) & $i(all_20_2) & $i(all_20_3) &
% 12.95/2.51  |         $i(all_20_4) & $i(all_20_5) & $i(all_20_6) & $i(all_20_7) &
% 12.95/2.51  |         $i(all_20_8) & $i(all_20_9) & $i(all_20_10) & $i(all_20_11) &
% 12.95/2.51  |         $i(all_20_12)
% 12.95/2.51  | 
% 12.95/2.51  | ALPHA: (13) implies:
% 12.95/2.51  |   (14)   ~ (all_20_0 = 0)
% 12.95/2.51  |   (15)  $i(all_20_12)
% 12.95/2.51  |   (16)  $i(all_20_11)
% 12.95/2.51  |   (17)  $i(all_20_10)
% 12.95/2.51  |   (18)  $i(all_20_7)
% 12.95/2.51  |   (19)  $i(all_20_6)
% 12.95/2.51  |   (20)  $i(all_20_4)
% 12.95/2.51  |   (21)  $i(all_20_1)
% 12.95/2.51  |   (22)  addition(all_20_12, all_20_11) = all_20_3
% 12.95/2.51  |   (23)  multiplication(all_20_10, all_20_12) = all_20_8
% 12.95/2.51  |   (24)  multiplication(all_20_10, all_20_11) = all_20_5
% 12.95/2.51  |   (25)  multiplication(all_20_10, all_20_3) = all_20_2
% 12.95/2.51  |   (26)  multiplication(all_20_8, all_20_7) = all_20_6
% 12.95/2.51  |   (27)  multiplication(all_20_5, all_20_7) = all_20_4
% 12.95/2.51  |   (28)  multiplication(all_20_2, all_20_7) = all_20_1
% 12.95/2.51  |   (29)  leq(all_20_6, zero) = 0
% 12.95/2.51  |   (30)  leq(all_20_4, zero) = 0
% 12.95/2.51  |   (31)  leq(all_20_1, zero) = all_20_0
% 12.95/2.51  | 
% 12.95/2.51  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_20_11, all_20_12, all_20_3,
% 12.95/2.51  |              simplifying with (15), (16), (22) gives:
% 12.95/2.51  |   (32)  addition(all_20_11, all_20_12) = all_20_3 & $i(all_20_3)
% 12.95/2.51  | 
% 12.95/2.51  | ALPHA: (32) implies:
% 12.95/2.51  |   (33)  $i(all_20_3)
% 12.95/2.51  | 
% 12.95/2.51  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_20_10, all_20_12, all_20_11, all_20_3,
% 12.95/2.51  |              all_20_2, simplifying with (15), (16), (17), (22), (25) gives:
% 12.95/2.51  |   (34)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] : (multiplication(all_20_10, all_20_11) = v1
% 12.95/2.51  |           & multiplication(all_20_10, all_20_12) = v0 & addition(v0, v1) =
% 12.95/2.51  |           all_20_2 & $i(v1) & $i(v0) & $i(all_20_2))
% 12.95/2.51  | 
% 12.95/2.51  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_20_10, all_20_12, all_20_7, all_20_8,
% 12.95/2.52  |              all_20_6, simplifying with (15), (17), (18), (23), (26) gives:
% 12.95/2.52  |   (35)   ? [v0: $i] : (multiplication(all_20_10, v0) = all_20_6 &
% 12.95/2.52  |           multiplication(all_20_12, all_20_7) = v0 & $i(v0) & $i(all_20_6))
% 12.95/2.52  | 
% 12.95/2.52  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_20_10, all_20_11, all_20_7, all_20_5,
% 12.95/2.52  |              all_20_4, simplifying with (16), (17), (18), (24), (27) gives:
% 12.95/2.52  |   (36)   ? [v0: $i] : (multiplication(all_20_10, v0) = all_20_4 &
% 12.95/2.52  |           multiplication(all_20_11, all_20_7) = v0 & $i(v0) & $i(all_20_4))
% 12.95/2.52  | 
% 12.95/2.52  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_20_10, all_20_3, all_20_7, all_20_2,
% 12.95/2.52  |              all_20_1, simplifying with (17), (18), (25), (28), (33) gives:
% 12.95/2.52  |   (37)   ? [v0: $i] : (multiplication(all_20_3, all_20_7) = v0 &
% 12.95/2.52  |           multiplication(all_20_10, v0) = all_20_1 & $i(v0) & $i(all_20_1))
% 12.95/2.52  | 
% 12.95/2.52  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with all_20_6, zero, simplifying with (9),
% 12.95/2.52  |              (19), (29) gives:
% 12.95/2.52  |   (38)  addition(all_20_6, zero) = zero
% 12.95/2.52  | 
% 12.95/2.52  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with all_20_4, zero, simplifying with (9),
% 12.95/2.52  |              (20), (30) gives:
% 12.95/2.52  |   (39)  addition(all_20_4, zero) = zero
% 12.95/2.52  | 
% 12.95/2.52  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (8) with all_20_1, zero, all_20_0, simplifying with
% 12.95/2.52  |              (9), (21), (31) gives:
% 12.95/2.52  |   (40)  all_20_0 = 0 |  ? [v0: $i] : ( ~ (v0 = zero) & addition(all_20_1,
% 12.95/2.52  |             zero) = v0 & $i(v0))
% 12.95/2.52  | 
% 12.95/2.52  | DELTA: instantiating (36) with fresh symbol all_32_0 gives:
% 12.95/2.52  |   (41)  multiplication(all_20_10, all_32_0) = all_20_4 &
% 12.95/2.52  |         multiplication(all_20_11, all_20_7) = all_32_0 & $i(all_32_0) &
% 12.95/2.52  |         $i(all_20_4)
% 12.95/2.52  | 
% 12.95/2.52  | DELTA: instantiating (37) with fresh symbol all_34_0 gives:
% 12.95/2.52  |   (42)  multiplication(all_20_3, all_20_7) = all_34_0 &
% 12.95/2.52  |         multiplication(all_20_10, all_34_0) = all_20_1 & $i(all_34_0) &
% 12.95/2.52  |         $i(all_20_1)
% 12.95/2.52  | 
% 12.95/2.52  | DELTA: instantiating (35) with fresh symbol all_36_0 gives:
% 12.95/2.52  |   (43)  multiplication(all_20_10, all_36_0) = all_20_6 &
% 12.95/2.52  |         multiplication(all_20_12, all_20_7) = all_36_0 & $i(all_36_0) &
% 12.95/2.52  |         $i(all_20_6)
% 12.95/2.52  | 
% 12.95/2.52  | DELTA: instantiating (34) with fresh symbols all_38_0, all_38_1 gives:
% 12.95/2.52  |   (44)  multiplication(all_20_10, all_20_11) = all_38_0 &
% 12.95/2.52  |         multiplication(all_20_10, all_20_12) = all_38_1 & addition(all_38_1,
% 12.95/2.52  |           all_38_0) = all_20_2 & $i(all_38_0) & $i(all_38_1) & $i(all_20_2)
% 12.95/2.52  | 
% 12.95/2.52  | ALPHA: (44) implies:
% 12.95/2.52  |   (45)  $i(all_38_1)
% 12.95/2.52  |   (46)  $i(all_38_0)
% 12.95/2.52  |   (47)  addition(all_38_1, all_38_0) = all_20_2
% 12.95/2.52  |   (48)  multiplication(all_20_10, all_20_12) = all_38_1
% 12.95/2.52  |   (49)  multiplication(all_20_10, all_20_11) = all_38_0
% 12.95/2.52  | 
% 12.95/2.52  | BETA: splitting (40) gives:
% 12.95/2.52  | 
% 12.95/2.52  | Case 1:
% 12.95/2.52  | | 
% 12.95/2.52  | |   (50)  all_20_0 = 0
% 12.95/2.52  | | 
% 12.95/2.52  | | REDUCE: (14), (50) imply:
% 12.95/2.52  | |   (51)  $false
% 12.95/2.52  | | 
% 12.95/2.52  | | CLOSE: (51) is inconsistent.
% 12.95/2.52  | | 
% 12.95/2.52  | Case 2:
% 12.95/2.52  | | 
% 12.95/2.52  | |   (52)   ? [v0: $i] : ( ~ (v0 = zero) & addition(all_20_1, zero) = v0 &
% 12.95/2.52  | |           $i(v0))
% 12.95/2.53  | | 
% 12.95/2.53  | | DELTA: instantiating (52) with fresh symbol all_57_0 gives:
% 12.95/2.53  | |   (53)   ~ (all_57_0 = zero) & addition(all_20_1, zero) = all_57_0 &
% 12.95/2.53  | |         $i(all_57_0)
% 12.95/2.53  | | 
% 12.95/2.53  | | ALPHA: (53) implies:
% 12.95/2.53  | |   (54)   ~ (all_57_0 = zero)
% 12.95/2.53  | |   (55)  addition(all_20_1, zero) = all_57_0
% 12.95/2.53  | | 
% 12.95/2.53  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (12) with all_20_8, all_38_1, all_20_12,
% 12.95/2.53  | |              all_20_10, simplifying with (23), (48) gives:
% 12.95/2.53  | |   (56)  all_38_1 = all_20_8
% 12.95/2.53  | | 
% 12.95/2.53  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (12) with all_20_5, all_38_0, all_20_11,
% 12.95/2.53  | |              all_20_10, simplifying with (24), (49) gives:
% 12.95/2.53  | |   (57)  all_38_0 = all_20_5
% 12.95/2.53  | | 
% 12.95/2.53  | | REDUCE: (47), (56), (57) imply:
% 12.95/2.53  | |   (58)  addition(all_20_8, all_20_5) = all_20_2
% 12.95/2.53  | | 
% 12.95/2.53  | | REDUCE: (46), (57) imply:
% 12.95/2.53  | |   (59)  $i(all_20_5)
% 12.95/2.53  | | 
% 12.95/2.53  | | REDUCE: (45), (56) imply:
% 12.95/2.53  | |   (60)  $i(all_20_8)
% 12.95/2.53  | | 
% 12.95/2.53  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_20_8, all_20_5, all_20_7, all_20_2,
% 12.95/2.53  | |              all_20_1, simplifying with (18), (28), (58), (59), (60) gives:
% 12.95/2.53  | |   (61)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] : (multiplication(all_20_5, all_20_7) = v1
% 12.95/2.53  | |           & multiplication(all_20_8, all_20_7) = v0 & addition(v0, v1) =
% 12.95/2.53  | |           all_20_1 & $i(v1) & $i(v0) & $i(all_20_1))
% 12.95/2.53  | | 
% 12.95/2.53  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with zero, all_20_6, all_20_6, zero, zero,
% 12.95/2.53  | |              simplifying with (9), (19), (38) gives:
% 12.95/2.53  | |   (62)   ? [v0: $i] : (addition(v0, zero) = zero & addition(all_20_6,
% 12.95/2.53  | |             all_20_6) = v0 & $i(v0))
% 12.95/2.53  | | 
% 12.95/2.53  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_20_6, zero, simplifying with (19),
% 12.95/2.53  | |              (38) gives:
% 12.95/2.53  | |   (63)  all_20_6 = zero
% 12.95/2.53  | | 
% 12.95/2.53  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with zero, all_20_6, zero, simplifying with
% 12.95/2.53  | |              (9), (19), (38) gives:
% 12.95/2.53  | |   (64)  addition(zero, all_20_6) = zero
% 12.95/2.53  | | 
% 12.95/2.53  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with zero, all_20_4, all_20_4, zero, zero,
% 12.95/2.53  | |              simplifying with (9), (20), (39) gives:
% 12.95/2.53  | |   (65)   ? [v0: $i] : (addition(v0, zero) = zero & addition(all_20_4,
% 12.95/2.53  | |             all_20_4) = v0 & $i(v0))
% 12.95/2.53  | | 
% 12.95/2.53  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with zero, all_20_6, all_20_4, zero, zero,
% 12.95/2.53  | |              simplifying with (9), (19), (20), (38), (39) gives:
% 12.95/2.53  | |   (66)   ? [v0: $i] : (addition(v0, zero) = zero & addition(all_20_4,
% 12.95/2.53  | |             all_20_6) = v0 & $i(v0))
% 12.95/2.53  | | 
% 12.95/2.53  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with zero, all_20_4, all_20_6, zero, zero,
% 12.95/2.53  | |              simplifying with (9), (19), (20), (38), (39) gives:
% 12.95/2.53  | |   (67)   ? [v0: $i] : (addition(v0, zero) = zero & addition(all_20_6,
% 12.95/2.53  | |             all_20_4) = v0 & $i(v0))
% 12.95/2.53  | | 
% 12.95/2.53  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_20_4, zero, simplifying with (20),
% 12.95/2.53  | |              (39) gives:
% 12.95/2.53  | |   (68)  all_20_4 = zero
% 12.95/2.53  | | 
% 12.95/2.53  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_20_1, all_57_0, simplifying with
% 13.40/2.53  | |              (21), (55) gives:
% 13.40/2.53  | |   (69)  all_57_0 = all_20_1
% 13.40/2.53  | | 
% 13.40/2.53  | | DELTA: instantiating (65) with fresh symbol all_69_0 gives:
% 13.40/2.53  | |   (70)  addition(all_69_0, zero) = zero & addition(all_20_4, all_20_4) =
% 13.40/2.53  | |         all_69_0 & $i(all_69_0)
% 13.40/2.53  | | 
% 13.40/2.53  | | ALPHA: (70) implies:
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (71)  addition(all_20_4, all_20_4) = all_69_0
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.54  | | DELTA: instantiating (67) with fresh symbol all_71_0 gives:
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (72)  addition(all_71_0, zero) = zero & addition(all_20_6, all_20_4) =
% 13.40/2.54  | |         all_71_0 & $i(all_71_0)
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.54  | | ALPHA: (72) implies:
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (73)  addition(all_20_6, all_20_4) = all_71_0
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.54  | | DELTA: instantiating (66) with fresh symbol all_73_0 gives:
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (74)  addition(all_73_0, zero) = zero & addition(all_20_4, all_20_6) =
% 13.40/2.54  | |         all_73_0 & $i(all_73_0)
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.54  | | ALPHA: (74) implies:
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (75)  addition(all_20_4, all_20_6) = all_73_0
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.54  | | DELTA: instantiating (62) with fresh symbol all_75_0 gives:
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (76)  addition(all_75_0, zero) = zero & addition(all_20_6, all_20_6) =
% 13.40/2.54  | |         all_75_0 & $i(all_75_0)
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.54  | | ALPHA: (76) implies:
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (77)  addition(all_20_6, all_20_6) = all_75_0
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.54  | | DELTA: instantiating (61) with fresh symbols all_85_0, all_85_1 gives:
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (78)  multiplication(all_20_5, all_20_7) = all_85_0 &
% 13.40/2.54  | |         multiplication(all_20_8, all_20_7) = all_85_1 & addition(all_85_1,
% 13.40/2.54  | |           all_85_0) = all_20_1 & $i(all_85_0) & $i(all_85_1) & $i(all_20_1)
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.54  | | ALPHA: (78) implies:
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (79)  addition(all_85_1, all_85_0) = all_20_1
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (80)  multiplication(all_20_8, all_20_7) = all_85_1
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (81)  multiplication(all_20_5, all_20_7) = all_85_0
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.54  | | REDUCE: (54), (69) imply:
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (82)   ~ (all_20_1 = zero)
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.54  | | REDUCE: (27), (68) imply:
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (83)  multiplication(all_20_5, all_20_7) = zero
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.54  | | REDUCE: (26), (63) imply:
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (84)  multiplication(all_20_8, all_20_7) = zero
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.54  | | REDUCE: (68), (71) imply:
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (85)  addition(zero, zero) = all_69_0
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.54  | | REDUCE: (63), (68), (75) imply:
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (86)  addition(zero, zero) = all_73_0
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.54  | | REDUCE: (63), (68), (73) imply:
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (87)  addition(zero, zero) = all_71_0
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.54  | | REDUCE: (63), (77) imply:
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (88)  addition(zero, zero) = all_75_0
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.54  | | REDUCE: (63), (64) imply:
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (89)  addition(zero, zero) = zero
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.54  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (11) with zero, all_73_0, zero, zero, simplifying
% 13.40/2.54  | |              with (86), (89) gives:
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (90)  all_73_0 = zero
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.54  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (11) with all_73_0, all_75_0, zero, zero,
% 13.40/2.54  | |              simplifying with (86), (88) gives:
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (91)  all_75_0 = all_73_0
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.54  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (11) with all_71_0, all_75_0, zero, zero,
% 13.40/2.54  | |              simplifying with (87), (88) gives:
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (92)  all_75_0 = all_71_0
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.54  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (11) with all_69_0, all_75_0, zero, zero,
% 13.40/2.54  | |              simplifying with (85), (88) gives:
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (93)  all_75_0 = all_69_0
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.54  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (12) with zero, all_85_1, all_20_7, all_20_8,
% 13.40/2.54  | |              simplifying with (80), (84) gives:
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (94)  all_85_1 = zero
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.54  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (12) with zero, all_85_0, all_20_7, all_20_5,
% 13.40/2.54  | |              simplifying with (81), (83) gives:
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (95)  all_85_0 = zero
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.54  | | COMBINE_EQS: (91), (92) imply:
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (96)  all_73_0 = all_71_0
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.54  | | SIMP: (96) implies:
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (97)  all_73_0 = all_71_0
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.54  | | COMBINE_EQS: (92), (93) imply:
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (98)  all_71_0 = all_69_0
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.54  | | COMBINE_EQS: (90), (97) imply:
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (99)  all_71_0 = zero
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.54  | | SIMP: (99) implies:
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (100)  all_71_0 = zero
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.54  | | COMBINE_EQS: (98), (100) imply:
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (101)  all_69_0 = zero
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.54  | | REDUCE: (79), (94), (95) imply:
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (102)  addition(zero, zero) = all_20_1
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.54  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (11) with zero, all_20_1, zero, zero, simplifying
% 13.40/2.54  | |              with (89), (102) gives:
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (103)  all_20_1 = zero
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.54  | | REDUCE: (82), (103) imply:
% 13.40/2.54  | |   (104)  $false
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.54  | | CLOSE: (104) is inconsistent.
% 13.40/2.54  | | 
% 13.40/2.55  | End of split
% 13.40/2.55  | 
% 13.40/2.55  End of proof
% 13.40/2.55  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 13.40/2.55  
% 13.40/2.55  1932ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------