TSTP Solution File: KLE035+1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : KLE035+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:03:58 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   40 (  33 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   58 (  30 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   26 (   8   ~;   4   |;  11   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   61 (   0 sgn;  38   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X7] :
      ( ( test(X7)
        & test(X6)
        & leq(multiplication(multiplication(X6,X4),c(X7)),zero)
        & leq(multiplication(multiplication(X6,X5),c(X7)),zero) )
     => leq(multiplication(multiplication(X6,addition(X4,X5)),c(X7)),zero) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ellG4x40NW/E---3.1_390.p',goals) ).

fof(multiplicative_associativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ellG4x40NW/E---3.1_390.p',multiplicative_associativity) ).

fof(order,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( leq(X1,X2)
    <=> addition(X1,X2) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ellG4x40NW/E---3.1_390.p',order) ).

fof(additive_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ellG4x40NW/E---3.1_390.p',additive_identity) ).

fof(right_distributivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ellG4x40NW/E---3.1_390.p',right_distributivity) ).

fof(left_distributivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(addition(X1,X2),X3) = addition(multiplication(X1,X3),multiplication(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ellG4x40NW/E---3.1_390.p',left_distributivity) ).

fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ellG4x40NW/E---3.1_390.p',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(additive_idempotence,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ellG4x40NW/E---3.1_390.p',additive_idempotence) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X4,X5,X6,X7] :
        ( ( test(X7)
          & test(X6)
          & leq(multiplication(multiplication(X6,X4),c(X7)),zero)
          & leq(multiplication(multiplication(X6,X5),c(X7)),zero) )
       => leq(multiplication(multiplication(X6,addition(X4,X5)),c(X7)),zero) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( test(esk5_0)
    & test(esk4_0)
    & leq(multiplication(multiplication(esk4_0,esk2_0),c(esk5_0)),zero)
    & leq(multiplication(multiplication(esk4_0,esk3_0),c(esk5_0)),zero)
    & ~ leq(multiplication(multiplication(esk4_0,addition(esk2_0,esk3_0)),c(esk5_0)),zero) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X15,X16,X17] : multiplication(X15,multiplication(X16,X17)) = multiplication(multiplication(X15,X16),X17),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_associativity]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X28,X29] :
      ( ( ~ leq(X28,X29)
        | addition(X28,X29) = X29 )
      & ( addition(X28,X29) != X29
        | leq(X28,X29) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[order])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    leq(multiplication(multiplication(esk4_0,esk2_0),c(esk5_0)),zero),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X13] : addition(X13,zero) = X13,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_identity]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    leq(multiplication(multiplication(esk4_0,esk3_0),c(esk5_0)),zero),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X20,X21,X22] : multiplication(X20,addition(X21,X22)) = addition(multiplication(X20,X21),multiplication(X20,X22)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[right_distributivity]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( addition(X1,X2) = X2
    | ~ leq(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    leq(multiplication(esk4_0,multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk5_0))),zero),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    leq(multiplication(esk4_0,multiplication(esk3_0,c(esk5_0))),zero),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X23,X24,X25] : multiplication(addition(X23,X24),X25) = addition(multiplication(X23,X25),multiplication(X24,X25)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[left_distributivity]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk4_0,multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk5_0))) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk4_0,multiplication(esk3_0,c(esk5_0))) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_20]),c_0_19]) ).

fof(c_0_25,plain,
    ! [X8,X9] : addition(X8,X9) = addition(X9,X8),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    multiplication(addition(X1,X2),X3) = addition(multiplication(X1,X3),multiplication(X2,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk4_0,addition(X1,multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk5_0)))) = multiplication(esk4_0,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk4_0,addition(X1,multiplication(esk3_0,c(esk5_0)))) = multiplication(esk4_0,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_24]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

fof(c_0_30,plain,
    ! [X14] : addition(X14,X14) = X14,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_idempotence]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(multiplication(multiplication(esk4_0,addition(esk2_0,esk3_0)),c(esk5_0)),zero),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    addition(multiplication(esk4_0,X1),multiplication(X2,addition(X1,multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk5_0))))) = multiplication(addition(esk4_0,X2),addition(X1,multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk5_0)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk4_0,addition(multiplication(esk3_0,c(esk5_0)),X1)) = multiplication(esk4_0,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | addition(X1,X2) != X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(multiplication(esk4_0,multiplication(addition(esk2_0,esk3_0),c(esk5_0))),zero),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk4_0,multiplication(addition(esk2_0,esk3_0),c(esk5_0))) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_24]),c_0_23]),c_0_34]),c_0_34]),c_0_26]),c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    leq(X1,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_38])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : KLE035+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 04:43:59 EDT 2023
% 0.19/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.47  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ellG4x40NW/E---3.1_390.p
% 0.19/0.53  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.19/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.53  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 469 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.53  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.19/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.53  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.53  # Search class: FGUSM-FFMS21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.53  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.53  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.53  # G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with pid 474 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.53  # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S
% 0.19/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.53  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.53  # Search class: FGUSM-FFMS21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.53  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.53  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.53  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.53  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.53  
% 0.19/0.53  # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.53  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.53  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.53  # Parsed axioms                        : 17
% 0.19/0.53  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.19/0.53  # Initial clauses                      : 27
% 0.19/0.53  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.19/0.53  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 27
% 0.19/0.53  # Processed clauses                    : 607
% 0.19/0.53  # ...of these trivial                  : 55
% 0.19/0.53  # ...subsumed                          : 250
% 0.19/0.53  # ...remaining for further processing  : 302
% 0.19/0.53  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.19/0.53  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.19/0.53  # Backward-subsumed                    : 8
% 0.19/0.53  # Backward-rewritten                   : 14
% 0.19/0.53  # Generated clauses                    : 3751
% 0.19/0.53  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2879
% 0.19/0.53  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.19/0.53  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.19/0.53  # Paramodulations                      : 3741
% 0.19/0.53  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.19/0.53  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.19/0.53  # Equation resolutions                 : 10
% 0.19/0.53  # Total rewrite steps                  : 4476
% 0.19/0.53  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.19/0.53  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.19/0.53  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.53  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.53  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.53  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.19/0.53  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.19/0.53  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.19/0.53  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.19/0.53  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.19/0.53  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.19/0.53  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.19/0.53  # Current number of processed clauses  : 253
% 0.19/0.53  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 149
% 0.19/0.53  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 5
% 0.19/0.53  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.53  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 99
% 0.19/0.53  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2321
% 0.19/0.53  # ...number of literals in the above   : 3460
% 0.19/0.53  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.19/0.53  # Current number of archived clauses   : 49
% 0.19/0.53  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1691
% 0.19/0.53  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1615
% 0.19/0.53  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 232
% 0.19/0.53  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 120
% 0.19/0.53  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.19/0.53  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 208
% 0.19/0.53  # BW rewrite match successes           : 38
% 0.19/0.53  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.19/0.53  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.19/0.53  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 57583
% 0.19/0.53  
% 0.19/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.53  # User time                : 0.045 s
% 0.19/0.53  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.53  # Total time               : 0.047 s
% 0.19/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 1748 pages
% 0.19/0.53  
% 0.19/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.53  # User time                : 0.210 s
% 0.19/0.53  # System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.19/0.53  # Total time               : 0.221 s
% 0.19/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 1688 pages
% 0.19/0.53  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.19/0.53  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------