TSTP Solution File: KLE034+1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : KLE034+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:04:45 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   52 (  37 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   97 (  48 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   68 (  23   ~;  19   |;  20   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   72 (   1 sgn;  46   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ( test(X7)
        & test(X6)
        & test(X8)
        & leq(multiplication(multiplication(X6,X4),c(X7)),zero)
        & leq(multiplication(multiplication(X7,X5),c(X8)),zero) )
     => leq(multiplication(multiplication(multiplication(X6,X4),X5),c(X8)),zero) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QGjR026Q1M/E---3.1_10037.p',goals) ).

fof(multiplicative_associativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QGjR026Q1M/E---3.1_10037.p',multiplicative_associativity) ).

fof(order,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( leq(X1,X2)
    <=> addition(X1,X2) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QGjR026Q1M/E---3.1_10037.p',order) ).

fof(additive_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QGjR026Q1M/E---3.1_10037.p',additive_identity) ).

fof(right_distributivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QGjR026Q1M/E---3.1_10037.p',right_distributivity) ).

fof(test_3,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( test(X4)
     => ( c(X4) = X5
      <=> complement(X4,X5) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QGjR026Q1M/E---3.1_10037.p',test_3) ).

fof(test_2,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( complement(X5,X4)
    <=> ( multiplication(X4,X5) = zero
        & multiplication(X5,X4) = zero
        & addition(X4,X5) = one ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QGjR026Q1M/E---3.1_10037.p',test_2) ).

fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QGjR026Q1M/E---3.1_10037.p',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(multiplicative_right_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QGjR026Q1M/E---3.1_10037.p',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

fof(right_annihilation,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(X1,zero) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QGjR026Q1M/E---3.1_10037.p',right_annihilation) ).

fof(additive_idempotence,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QGjR026Q1M/E---3.1_10037.p',additive_idempotence) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X4,X5,X6,X7,X8] :
        ( ( test(X7)
          & test(X6)
          & test(X8)
          & leq(multiplication(multiplication(X6,X4),c(X7)),zero)
          & leq(multiplication(multiplication(X7,X5),c(X8)),zero) )
       => leq(multiplication(multiplication(multiplication(X6,X4),X5),c(X8)),zero) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( test(esk5_0)
    & test(esk4_0)
    & test(esk6_0)
    & leq(multiplication(multiplication(esk4_0,esk2_0),c(esk5_0)),zero)
    & leq(multiplication(multiplication(esk5_0,esk3_0),c(esk6_0)),zero)
    & ~ leq(multiplication(multiplication(multiplication(esk4_0,esk2_0),esk3_0),c(esk6_0)),zero) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X16,X17,X18] : multiplication(X16,multiplication(X17,X18)) = multiplication(multiplication(X16,X17),X18),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_associativity]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X29,X30] :
      ( ( ~ leq(X29,X30)
        | addition(X29,X30) = X30 )
      & ( addition(X29,X30) != X30
        | leq(X29,X30) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[order])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    leq(multiplication(multiplication(esk4_0,esk2_0),c(esk5_0)),zero),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X14] : addition(X14,zero) = X14,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_identity]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X21,X22,X23] : multiplication(X21,addition(X22,X23)) = addition(multiplication(X21,X22),multiplication(X21,X23)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[right_distributivity]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( addition(X1,X2) = X2
    | ~ leq(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    leq(multiplication(esk4_0,multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk5_0))),zero),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X37,X38] :
      ( ( c(X37) != X38
        | complement(X37,X38)
        | ~ test(X37) )
      & ( ~ complement(X37,X38)
        | c(X37) = X38
        | ~ test(X37) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_3])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk4_0,multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk5_0))) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]) ).

fof(c_0_25,plain,
    ! [X35,X36] :
      ( ( multiplication(X35,X36) = zero
        | ~ complement(X36,X35) )
      & ( multiplication(X36,X35) = zero
        | ~ complement(X36,X35) )
      & ( addition(X35,X36) = one
        | ~ complement(X36,X35) )
      & ( multiplication(X35,X36) != zero
        | multiplication(X36,X35) != zero
        | addition(X35,X36) != one
        | complement(X36,X35) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_2])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( complement(X1,X2)
    | c(X1) != X2
    | ~ test(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

fof(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X9,X10] : addition(X9,X10) = addition(X10,X9),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk4_0,addition(X1,multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk5_0)))) = multiplication(esk4_0,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( addition(X1,X2) = one
    | ~ complement(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( complement(X1,c(X1))
    | ~ test(X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

fof(c_0_32,plain,
    ! [X19] : multiplication(X19,one) = X19,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_right_identity]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk4_0,multiplication(esk2_0,addition(X1,c(esk5_0)))) = multiplication(esk4_0,multiplication(esk2_0,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( addition(X1,c(X1)) = one
    | ~ test(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    test(esk5_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    leq(multiplication(multiplication(esk5_0,esk3_0),c(esk6_0)),zero),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk4_0,multiplication(esk2_0,esk5_0)) = multiplication(esk4_0,esk2_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35]),c_0_36])]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    leq(multiplication(esk5_0,multiplication(esk3_0,c(esk6_0))),zero),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_40,plain,
    ! [X27] : multiplication(X27,zero) = zero,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[right_annihilation]) ).

fof(c_0_41,plain,
    ! [X15] : addition(X15,X15) = X15,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_idempotence]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(multiplication(multiplication(multiplication(esk4_0,esk2_0),esk3_0),c(esk6_0)),zero),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk4_0,multiplication(esk2_0,multiplication(esk5_0,X1))) = multiplication(esk4_0,multiplication(esk2_0,X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_38]),c_0_16]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk5_0,multiplication(esk3_0,c(esk6_0))) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_39]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    multiplication(X1,zero) = zero,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | addition(X1,X2) != X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(multiplication(esk4_0,multiplication(esk2_0,multiplication(esk3_0,c(esk6_0)))),zero),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_16]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk4_0,multiplication(esk2_0,multiplication(esk3_0,c(esk6_0)))) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]),c_0_45]),c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    leq(X1,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49]),c_0_50])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.10  % Problem    : KLE034+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.10/0.11  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 04:43:55 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.42  Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QGjR026Q1M/E---3.1_10037.p
% 0.15/0.44  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.44  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.44  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.44  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.44  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 10116 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.44  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/0.44  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.44  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.44  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.44  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.44  # Search class: FGUSM-FFMS21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.44  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.44  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44  # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44  # G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with pid 10120 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.44  # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S
% 0.15/0.44  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.44  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.44  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.44  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.44  # Search class: FGUSM-FFMS21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.44  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.44  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.44  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.44  
% 0.15/0.44  # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.44  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/0.44  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.44  # Parsed axioms                        : 17
% 0.15/0.44  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.15/0.44  # Initial clauses                      : 28
% 0.15/0.44  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.15/0.44  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 28
% 0.15/0.44  # Processed clauses                    : 146
% 0.15/0.44  # ...of these trivial                  : 3
% 0.15/0.44  # ...subsumed                          : 23
% 0.15/0.44  # ...remaining for further processing  : 120
% 0.15/0.44  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.15/0.44  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.15/0.44  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.15/0.44  # Backward-rewritten                   : 8
% 0.15/0.44  # Generated clauses                    : 478
% 0.15/0.44  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 324
% 0.15/0.44  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.15/0.44  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.15/0.44  # Paramodulations                      : 469
% 0.15/0.44  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.15/0.44  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.15/0.44  # Equation resolutions                 : 9
% 0.15/0.44  # Total rewrite steps                  : 510
% 0.15/0.44  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.15/0.44  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.15/0.44  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.44  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.15/0.44  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.44  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.15/0.44  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44  # Current number of processed clauses  : 84
% 0.15/0.44  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 42
% 0.15/0.44  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.15/0.44  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.15/0.44  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 40
% 0.15/0.44  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 234
% 0.15/0.44  # ...number of literals in the above   : 336
% 0.15/0.44  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.15/0.44  # Current number of archived clauses   : 36
% 0.15/0.44  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 176
% 0.15/0.44  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 156
% 0.15/0.44  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 20
% 0.15/0.44  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.15/0.44  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.15/0.44  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 41
% 0.15/0.44  # BW rewrite match successes           : 22
% 0.15/0.44  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.15/0.44  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.15/0.44  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 6131
% 0.15/0.44  
% 0.15/0.44  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.44  # User time                : 0.009 s
% 0.15/0.44  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.44  # Total time               : 0.014 s
% 0.15/0.44  # Maximum resident set size: 1760 pages
% 0.15/0.44  
% 0.15/0.44  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.44  # User time                : 0.049 s
% 0.15/0.44  # System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.15/0.44  # Total time               : 0.060 s
% 0.15/0.44  # Maximum resident set size: 1688 pages
% 0.15/0.44  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------