TSTP Solution File: KLE025+2 by Leo-III---1.7.7

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.7.7
% Problem  : KLE025+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:24:51 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 11.85s 3.13s
% Output   : Refutation 11.85s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :   30
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :  126 (  63 unt;  11 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  207 ( 156 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  681 (  82   ~;  46   |;  18   &; 507   @)
%                                         (   4 <=>;  24  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   10 (  10   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   13 (  11 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  154 (   0   ^; 151   !;   3   ?; 154   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(test_type,type,
    test: $i > $o ).

thf(multiplication_type,type,
    multiplication: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(c_type,type,
    c: $i > $i ).

thf(zero_type,type,
    zero: $i ).

thf(addition_type,type,
    addition: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(leq_type,type,
    leq: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(one_type,type,
    one: $i ).

thf(complement_type,type,
    complement: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(sk1_type,type,
    sk1: $i ).

thf(sk2_type,type,
    sk2: $i ).

thf(sk3_type,type,
    sk3: $i ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( complement @ B @ A )
    <=> ( ( ( multiplication @ A @ B )
          = zero )
        & ( ( multiplication @ B @ A )
          = zero )
        & ( ( addition @ A @ B )
          = one ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',test_2) ).

thf(56,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( complement @ B @ A )
       => ( ( ( multiplication @ A @ B )
            = zero )
          & ( ( multiplication @ B @ A )
            = zero )
          & ( ( addition @ A @ B )
            = one ) ) )
      & ( ( ( ( multiplication @ A @ B )
            = zero )
          & ( ( multiplication @ B @ A )
            = zero )
          & ( ( addition @ A @ B )
            = one ) )
       => ( complement @ B @ A ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( multiplication @ ( addition @ A @ B ) @ C )
      = ( addition @ ( multiplication @ A @ C ) @ ( multiplication @ B @ C ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',left_distributivity) ).

thf(50,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( multiplication @ ( addition @ A @ B ) @ C )
      = ( addition @ ( multiplication @ A @ C ) @ ( multiplication @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(51,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( multiplication @ ( addition @ A @ B ) @ C )
      = ( addition @ ( multiplication @ A @ C ) @ ( multiplication @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[50]) ).

thf(52,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( addition @ ( multiplication @ A @ C ) @ ( multiplication @ B @ C ) )
      = ( multiplication @ ( addition @ A @ B ) @ C ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[51]) ).

thf(17,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( test @ A )
        & ( test @ B ) )
     => ( ( c @ ( addition @ A @ B ) )
        = ( multiplication @ ( c @ A ) @ ( c @ B ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',test_deMorgan1) ).

thf(84,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( test @ A )
        & ( test @ B ) )
     => ( ( c @ ( addition @ A @ B ) )
        = ( multiplication @ ( c @ A ) @ ( c @ B ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( addition @ A @ B )
      = ( addition @ B @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',additive_commutativity) ).

thf(34,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( addition @ A @ B )
      = ( addition @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(35,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( addition @ A @ B )
      = ( addition @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[34]) ).

thf(36,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( addition @ A @ B )
      = ( addition @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[35]) ).

thf(18,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( addition @ A @ zero )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',additive_identity) ).

thf(87,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( addition @ A @ zero )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[18]) ).

thf(88,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( addition @ A @ zero )
      = A ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[87]) ).

thf(89,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( addition @ A @ zero )
      = A ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[88]) ).

thf(247,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( addition @ B @ A )
        = C )
      | ( ( addition @ A @ B )
       != ( addition @ C @ zero ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[36,89]) ).

thf(248,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( addition @ zero @ A )
      = A ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[247:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( zero )),bind(C,$thf( A ))]]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( multiplication @ one @ A )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiplicative_left_identity) ).

thf(53,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( multiplication @ one @ A )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( test @ B )
        & ( test @ C ) )
     => ( ( ( multiplication @ ( multiplication @ B @ A ) @ ( c @ C ) )
          = zero )
       => ( ( multiplication @ B @ A )
          = ( multiplication @ ( multiplication @ B @ A ) @ C ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
        ( ( ( test @ B )
          & ( test @ C ) )
       => ( ( ( multiplication @ ( multiplication @ B @ A ) @ ( c @ C ) )
            = zero )
         => ( ( multiplication @ B @ A )
            = ( multiplication @ ( multiplication @ B @ A ) @ C ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(21,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
        ( ( ( test @ B )
          & ( test @ C ) )
       => ( ( ( multiplication @ ( multiplication @ B @ A ) @ ( c @ C ) )
            = zero )
         => ( ( multiplication @ B @ A )
            = ( multiplication @ ( multiplication @ B @ A ) @ C ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ( ( multiplication @ ( multiplication @ sk2 @ sk1 ) @ ( c @ sk3 ) )
    = zero ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[21]) ).

thf(27,plain,
    ( ( multiplication @ ( multiplication @ sk2 @ sk1 ) @ ( c @ sk3 ) )
    = zero ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[23]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( multiplication @ A @ ( multiplication @ B @ C ) )
      = ( multiplication @ ( multiplication @ A @ B ) @ C ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiplicative_associativity) ).

thf(47,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( multiplication @ A @ ( multiplication @ B @ C ) )
      = ( multiplication @ ( multiplication @ A @ B ) @ C ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(48,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( multiplication @ A @ ( multiplication @ B @ C ) )
      = ( multiplication @ ( multiplication @ A @ B ) @ C ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[47]) ).

thf(49,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( multiplication @ ( multiplication @ A @ B ) @ C )
      = ( multiplication @ A @ ( multiplication @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[48]) ).

thf(409,plain,
    ( ( multiplication @ sk2 @ ( multiplication @ sk1 @ ( c @ sk3 ) ) )
    = zero ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[27,49]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( multiplication @ zero @ A )
      = zero ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',left_annihilation) ).

thf(44,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( multiplication @ zero @ A )
      = zero ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(45,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( multiplication @ zero @ A )
      = zero ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[44]) ).

thf(46,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( multiplication @ zero @ A )
      = zero ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[45]) ).

thf(22,plain,
    ( ( multiplication @ sk2 @ sk1 )
   != ( multiplication @ ( multiplication @ sk2 @ sk1 ) @ sk3 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[21]) ).

thf(26,plain,
    ( ( multiplication @ ( multiplication @ sk2 @ sk1 ) @ sk3 )
   != ( multiplication @ sk2 @ sk1 ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[22]) ).

thf(107,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( multiplication @ sk2 @ sk1 )
       != zero )
      | ( ( multiplication @ zero @ A )
       != ( multiplication @ ( multiplication @ sk2 @ sk1 ) @ sk3 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[46,26]) ).

thf(117,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( multiplication @ sk2 @ sk1 )
       != zero )
      | ( ( multiplication @ sk2 @ sk1 )
       != zero )
      | ( A != sk3 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[107]) ).

thf(122,plain,
    ( ( multiplication @ sk2 @ sk1 )
   != zero ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[117]) ).

thf(481,plain,
    ( ( multiplication @ sk2 @ ( multiplication @ sk1 @ ( c @ sk3 ) ) )
   != ( multiplication @ sk2 @ sk1 ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[409,122]) ).

thf(489,plain,
    ( ( sk2 != sk2 )
    | ( ( multiplication @ sk1 @ ( c @ sk3 ) )
     != sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[481]) ).

thf(503,plain,
    ( ( multiplication @ sk1 @ ( c @ sk3 ) )
   != sk1 ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[489]) ).

thf(54,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( multiplication @ one @ A )
      = A ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[53]) ).

thf(55,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( multiplication @ one @ A )
      = A ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[54]) ).

thf(14,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( multiplication @ A @ one )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

thf(73,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( multiplication @ A @ one )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(74,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( multiplication @ A @ one )
      = A ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[73]) ).

thf(75,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( multiplication @ A @ one )
      = A ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[74]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( leq @ A @ B )
    <=> ( ( addition @ A @ B )
        = B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',order) ).

thf(37,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( leq @ A @ B )
       => ( ( addition @ A @ B )
          = B ) )
      & ( ( ( addition @ A @ B )
          = B )
       => ( leq @ A @ B ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(38,plain,
    ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( leq @ A @ B )
       => ( ( addition @ A @ B )
          = B ) )
    & ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( ( addition @ A @ B )
          = B )
       => ( leq @ A @ B ) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[37]) ).

thf(39,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( addition @ A @ B )
       != B )
      | ( leq @ A @ B ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[38]) ).

thf(41,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( addition @ A @ B )
       != B )
      | ( leq @ A @ B ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[39]) ).

thf(42,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( addition @ A @ B )
       != B )
      | ( leq @ A @ B ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[41]) ).

thf(24,plain,
    test @ sk3,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[21]) ).

thf(25,plain,
    test @ sk2,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[21]) ).

thf(15,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( multiplication @ A @ zero )
      = zero ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',right_annihilation) ).

thf(76,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( multiplication @ A @ zero )
      = zero ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(77,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( multiplication @ A @ zero )
      = zero ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[76]) ).

thf(78,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( multiplication @ A @ zero )
      = zero ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[77]) ).

thf(145,plain,
    ( ( multiplication @ ( multiplication @ sk2 @ sk1 ) @ ( c @ sk3 ) )
   != ( multiplication @ sk2 @ sk1 ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[27,122]) ).

thf(148,plain,
    ( ( ( multiplication @ sk2 @ sk1 )
     != sk2 )
    | ( ( c @ sk3 )
     != sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[145]) ).

thf(390,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A != sk2 )
      | ( ( c @ sk3 )
       != sk1 )
      | ( ( multiplication @ one @ A )
       != ( multiplication @ sk2 @ sk1 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[55,148]) ).

thf(397,plain,
    ( ( ( c @ sk3 )
     != sk1 )
    | ( sk2 != one )
    | ( sk2 != sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[390]) ).

thf(323,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A != C )
      | ( leq @ B @ C )
      | ( ( addition @ zero @ A )
       != ( addition @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[248,42]) ).

thf(324,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A != A )
      | ( leq @ zero @ A ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[323:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( zero )),bind(C,$thf( A ))]]) ).

thf(334,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( leq @ zero @ A ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[324]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( addition @ C @ ( addition @ B @ A ) )
      = ( addition @ ( addition @ C @ B ) @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',additive_associativity) ).

thf(28,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( addition @ C @ ( addition @ B @ A ) )
      = ( addition @ ( addition @ C @ B ) @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(13,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( test @ A )
     => ( ( c @ A )
        = zero ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',test_4) ).

thf(70,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( test @ A )
     => ( ( c @ A )
        = zero ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( addition @ A @ A )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',additive_idempotence) ).

thf(31,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( addition @ A @ A )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(32,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( addition @ A @ A )
      = A ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[31]) ).

thf(33,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( addition @ A @ A )
      = A ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[32]) ).

thf(105,plain,
    ( ( ( multiplication @ sk2 @ sk1 )
     != sk2 )
    | ( sk3 != sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[26]) ).

thf(513,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A != sk1 )
      | ( ( multiplication @ A @ one )
       != ( multiplication @ sk1 @ ( c @ sk3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[75,503]) ).

thf(525,plain,
    ( ( sk1 != sk1 )
    | ( ( c @ sk3 )
     != one ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[513]) ).

thf(530,plain,
    ( ( c @ sk3 )
   != one ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[525]) ).

thf(164,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( multiplication @ A @ sk3 )
       != ( multiplication @ sk2 @ sk1 ) )
      | ( ( multiplication @ one @ A )
       != ( multiplication @ sk2 @ sk1 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[55,26]) ).

thf(170,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A != sk2 )
      | ( sk3 != sk1 )
      | ( sk2 != one )
      | ( A != sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[164]) ).

thf(180,plain,
    ( ( sk3 != sk1 )
    | ( sk2 != one )
    | ( sk2 != sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[170]) ).

thf(143,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( multiplication @ zero @ A )
     != ( multiplication @ sk2 @ sk1 ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[46,122]) ).

thf(146,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( sk2 != zero )
      | ( A != sk1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[143]) ).

thf(149,plain,
    sk2 != zero,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[146]) ).

thf(325,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A != C )
      | ( leq @ B @ C )
      | ( ( addition @ A @ A )
       != ( addition @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[33,42]) ).

thf(326,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A != A )
      | ( leq @ A @ A ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[325:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( A )),bind(C,$thf( A ))]]) ).

thf(335,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( leq @ A @ A ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[326]) ).

thf(197,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( multiplication @ A @ sk3 )
       != ( multiplication @ sk2 @ sk1 ) )
      | ( ( multiplication @ A @ one )
       != ( multiplication @ sk2 @ sk1 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[75,26]) ).

thf(207,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A != sk2 )
      | ( sk3 != sk1 )
      | ( A != sk2 )
      | ( sk1 != one ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[197]) ).

thf(219,plain,
    ( ( sk3 != sk1 )
    | ( sk1 != one ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[207]) ).

thf(20,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( multiplication @ A @ ( addition @ B @ C ) )
      = ( addition @ ( multiplication @ A @ B ) @ ( multiplication @ A @ C ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',right_distributivity) ).

thf(98,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( multiplication @ A @ ( addition @ B @ C ) )
      = ( addition @ ( multiplication @ A @ B ) @ ( multiplication @ A @ C ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[20]) ).

thf(144,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( multiplication @ A @ zero )
     != ( multiplication @ sk2 @ sk1 ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[78,122]) ).

thf(147,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A != sk2 )
      | ( sk1 != zero ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[144]) ).

thf(150,plain,
    sk1 != zero,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[147]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( test @ A )
        & ( test @ B ) )
     => ( ( c @ ( multiplication @ A @ B ) )
        = ( addition @ ( c @ A ) @ ( c @ B ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',test_deMorgan2) ).

thf(67,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( test @ A )
        & ( test @ B ) )
     => ( ( c @ ( multiplication @ A @ B ) )
        = ( addition @ ( c @ A ) @ ( c @ B ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(71,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( test @ A )
      | ( ( c @ A )
        = zero ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[70]) ).

thf(72,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( c @ A )
        = zero )
      | ( test @ A ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[71]) ).

thf(40,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( leq @ A @ B )
      | ( ( addition @ A @ B )
        = B ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[38]) ).

thf(43,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( addition @ A @ B )
        = B )
      | ~ ( leq @ A @ B ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[40]) ).

thf(29,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( addition @ C @ ( addition @ B @ A ) )
      = ( addition @ ( addition @ C @ B ) @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[28]) ).

thf(30,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( addition @ ( addition @ C @ B ) @ A )
      = ( addition @ C @ ( addition @ B @ A ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[29]) ).

thf(16,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( test @ A )
    <=> ? [B: $i] : ( complement @ B @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',test_1) ).

thf(79,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( test @ A )
       => ? [B: $i] : ( complement @ B @ A ) )
      & ( ? [B: $i] : ( complement @ B @ A )
       => ( test @ A ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(387,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A != sk2 )
      | ( ( c @ sk3 )
       != sk1 )
      | ( ( multiplication @ A @ one )
       != ( multiplication @ sk2 @ sk1 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[75,148]) ).

thf(394,plain,
    ( ( ( c @ sk3 )
     != sk1 )
    | ( sk2 != sk2 )
    | ( sk1 != one ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[387]) ).

thf(400,plain,
    ( ( ( c @ sk3 )
     != sk1 )
    | ( sk1 != one ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[394]) ).

thf(19,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( test @ A )
     => ( ( ( c @ A )
          = B )
      <=> ( complement @ A @ B ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',test_3) ).

thf(90,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( test @ A )
     => ( ( ( ( c @ A )
            = B )
         => ( complement @ A @ B ) )
        & ( ( complement @ A @ B )
         => ( ( c @ A )
            = B ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

thf(198,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A
       != ( multiplication @ sk2 @ sk1 ) )
      | ( ( multiplication @ A @ one )
       != ( multiplication @ ( multiplication @ sk2 @ sk1 ) @ sk3 ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[75,26]) ).

thf(211,plain,
    ( ( ( multiplication @ sk2 @ sk1 )
     != ( multiplication @ sk2 @ sk1 ) )
    | ( sk3 != one ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[198]) ).

thf(222,plain,
    sk3 != one,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[211]) ).

thf(1419,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[56,52,84,248,53,503,44,87,55,75,47,42,24,37,25,46,78,397,89,334,28,70,21,33,73,105,530,34,148,180,149,49,335,219,76,98,150,409,50,67,31,72,43,36,30,79,400,90,122,222]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.08  % Problem  : KLE025+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.04/0.10  % Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.10/0.28  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.28  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.28  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.28  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.28  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.28  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.28  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.28  % DateTime : Fri May 19 03:00:51 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.28  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.76/0.73  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.03/0.87  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (137ms). 
% 1.03/0.88  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.54/1.09  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.54/1.09  % [INFO] 	 cvc4 registered as external prover. 
% 1.54/1.09  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.54/1.15  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture and 18 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.76/1.19  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 18 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.88/1.22  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 1.88/1.22  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.88/1.22  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 11.85/3.12  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 11.85/3.12  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 11.85/3.13  % Time passed: 2726ms (effective reasoning time: 2245ms)
% 11.85/3.13  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 11.85/3.13  % Axioms used in derivation (18): test_3, test_4, left_annihilation, right_distributivity, multiplicative_right_identity, test_1, test_deMorgan2, additive_identity, additive_idempotence, additive_associativity, order, additive_commutativity, right_annihilation, test_deMorgan1, test_2, multiplicative_left_identity, multiplicative_associativity, left_distributivity
% 11.85/3.13  % No. of inferences in proof: 115
% 11.85/3.13  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2726 ms resp. 2245 ms w/o parsing
% 11.85/3.18  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 11.85/3.18  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------