TSTP Solution File: KLE025+2 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : KLE025+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 01:55:25 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.26s 6.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 52 ( 28 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 106 ( 61 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 90 ( 36 ~; 32 |; 13 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 81 ( 4 sgn 47 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(test_2,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( complement(X5,X4)
<=> ( multiplication(X4,X5) = zero
& multiplication(X5,X4) = zero
& addition(X4,X5) = one ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).
fof(test_1,axiom,
! [X4] :
( test(X4)
<=> ? [X5] : complement(X5,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_1) ).
fof(right_distributivity,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_distributivity) ).
fof(additive_identity,axiom,
! [X1] : addition(X1,zero) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_identity) ).
fof(goals,conjecture,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( test(X5)
& test(X6) )
=> ( multiplication(multiplication(X5,X4),c(X6)) = zero
=> multiplication(X5,X4) = multiplication(multiplication(X5,X4),X6) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).
fof(test_3,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( test(X4)
=> ( c(X4) = X5
<=> complement(X4,X5) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_3) ).
fof(additive_idempotence,axiom,
! [X1] : addition(X1,X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_idempotence) ).
fof(test_deMorgan2,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( ( test(X4)
& test(X5) )
=> c(multiplication(X4,X5)) = addition(c(X4),c(X5)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+2.ax',test_deMorgan2) ).
fof(multiplicative_right_identity,axiom,
! [X1] : multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).
fof(multiplicative_associativity,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_associativity) ).
fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X6,X7,X6,X7] :
( ( multiplication(X6,X7) = zero
| ~ complement(X7,X6) )
& ( multiplication(X7,X6) = zero
| ~ complement(X7,X6) )
& ( addition(X6,X7) = one
| ~ complement(X7,X6) )
& ( multiplication(X6,X7) != zero
| multiplication(X7,X6) != zero
| addition(X6,X7) != one
| complement(X7,X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_2])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X6,X6,X8] :
( ( ~ test(X6)
| complement(esk1_1(X6),X6) )
& ( ~ complement(X8,X6)
| test(X6) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_1])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] : multiplication(X4,addition(X5,X6)) = addition(multiplication(X4,X5),multiplication(X4,X6)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[right_distributivity]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( multiplication(X2,X1) = zero
| ~ complement(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( complement(esk1_1(X1),X1)
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X2] : addition(X2,zero) = X2,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_identity]) ).
fof(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( test(X5)
& test(X6) )
=> ( multiplication(multiplication(X5,X4),c(X6)) = zero
=> multiplication(X5,X4) = multiplication(multiplication(X5,X4),X6) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X6,X7,X7] :
( ( c(X6) != X7
| complement(X6,X7)
| ~ test(X6) )
& ( ~ complement(X6,X7)
| c(X6) = X7
| ~ test(X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_3])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X2] : addition(X2,X2) = X2,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_idempotence]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X6,X7] :
( ~ test(X6)
| ~ test(X7)
| c(multiplication(X6,X7)) = addition(c(X6),c(X7)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_deMorgan2])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( multiplication(X1,esk1_1(X1)) = zero
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
addition(X1,zero) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( addition(X2,X1) = one
| ~ complement(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_25,plain,
! [X2] : multiplication(X2,one) = X2,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_right_identity]) ).
fof(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( test(esk3_0)
& test(esk4_0)
& multiplication(multiplication(esk3_0,esk2_0),c(esk4_0)) = zero
& multiplication(esk3_0,esk2_0) != multiplication(multiplication(esk3_0,esk2_0),esk4_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])])]) ).
fof(c_0_27,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] : multiplication(X4,multiplication(X5,X6)) = multiplication(multiplication(X4,X5),X6),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_associativity]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( complement(X1,X2)
| ~ test(X1)
| c(X1) != X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
addition(X1,X1) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( c(multiplication(X1,X2)) = addition(c(X1),c(X2))
| ~ test(X2)
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( multiplication(X1,addition(X2,esk1_1(X1))) = multiplication(X1,X2)
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( addition(X1,esk1_1(X1)) = one
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
multiplication(multiplication(esk3_0,esk2_0),c(esk4_0)) = zero,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( addition(X1,X2) = one
| c(X2) != X1
| ~ test(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( c(multiplication(X1,X1)) = c(X1)
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( multiplication(X1,X1) = X1
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
test(esk4_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
multiplication(esk3_0,multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk4_0))) = zero,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
( addition(X1,multiplication(X2,X2)) = one
| c(X2) != X1
| ~ test(multiplication(X2,X2))
| ~ test(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
multiplication(esk4_0,esk4_0) = esk4_0,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).
fof(c_0_43,plain,
! [X3,X4] : addition(X3,X4) = addition(X4,X3),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
multiplication(esk3_0,addition(X1,multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk4_0)))) = multiplication(esk3_0,X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_40]),c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
( addition(X1,esk4_0) = one
| c(esk4_0) != X1 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_39])]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_43]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
multiplication(esk3_0,esk2_0) != multiplication(multiplication(esk3_0,esk2_0),esk4_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
multiplication(esk3_0,multiplication(esk2_0,addition(X1,c(esk4_0)))) = multiplication(esk3_0,multiplication(esk2_0,X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
addition(esk4_0,c(esk4_0)) = one,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_45]),c_0_46]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
multiplication(esk3_0,multiplication(esk2_0,esk4_0)) != multiplication(esk3_0,esk2_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49]),c_0_33]),c_0_50]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : KLE025+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 09:39:14 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.26/6.45 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_63dc1b1eb7d762c2f3686774d32795976f981b97 for 23 seconds:
% 0.26/6.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.26/6.45
% 0.26/6.45 # Proof found!
% 0.26/6.45 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.26/6.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/6.45 # Proof object total steps : 52
% 0.26/6.45 # Proof object clause steps : 29
% 0.26/6.45 # Proof object formula steps : 23
% 0.26/6.45 # Proof object conjectures : 14
% 0.26/6.45 # Proof object clause conjectures : 11
% 0.26/6.45 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.26/6.45 # Proof object initial clauses used : 14
% 0.26/6.45 # Proof object initial formulas used : 11
% 0.26/6.45 # Proof object generating inferences : 13
% 0.26/6.45 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 10
% 0.26/6.45 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.26/6.45 # Parsed axioms : 19
% 0.26/6.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.26/6.45 # Initial clauses : 28
% 0.26/6.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.26/6.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 28
% 0.26/6.45 # Processed clauses : 5634
% 0.26/6.45 # ...of these trivial : 180
% 0.26/6.45 # ...subsumed : 4187
% 0.26/6.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 1267
% 0.26/6.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 4
% 0.26/6.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 191803
% 0.26/6.45 # Backward-subsumed : 65
% 0.26/6.45 # Backward-rewritten : 120
% 0.26/6.45 # Generated clauses : 338737
% 0.26/6.45 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 310353
% 0.26/6.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2389
% 0.26/6.45 # Paramodulations : 338720
% 0.26/6.45 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.26/6.45 # Equation resolutions : 17
% 0.26/6.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 1082
% 0.26/6.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 119
% 0.26/6.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 18
% 0.26/6.45 # Negative unit clauses : 37
% 0.26/6.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 908
% 0.26/6.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 104867
% 0.26/6.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 404884
% 0.26/6.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/6.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 185
% 0.26/6.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 285211
% 0.26/6.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 160459
% 0.26/6.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3766
% 0.26/6.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5715
% 0.26/6.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/6.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 365
% 0.26/6.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 123
% 0.26/6.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/6.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/6.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7881863
% 0.26/6.45
% 0.26/6.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/6.45 # User time : 5.121 s
% 0.26/6.45 # System time : 0.097 s
% 0.26/6.45 # Total time : 5.218 s
% 0.26/6.45 # Maximum resident set size: 134556 pages
% 0.26/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.26/23.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.26/23.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.26/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------