TSTP Solution File: KLE010+4 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : KLE010+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:26:07 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 2.59s 2.77s
% Output : Refutation 2.59s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 17
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 69 ( 53 unt; 0 nHn; 58 RR)
% Number of literals : 90 ( 47 equ; 26 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 37 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
addition(X,X) = X,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_idempotence) ).
cnf(3,plain,
addition(X,addition(X,Y)) = addition(X,Y),
inference('EMBED',[status(thm)],[2]) ).
cnf(6,axiom,
multiplication(one,X) = X,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_left_identity) ).
cnf(8,axiom,
multiplication(addition(X,Y),Z) = addition(multiplication(X,Z),multiplication(Y,Z)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',left_distributivity) ).
cnf(11,axiom,
( ~ leq(X,Y)
| addition(X,Y) = Y ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',order) ).
cnf(12,axiom,
( leq(X,Y)
| addition(X,Y) != Y ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',order) ).
cnf(13,axiom,
( ~ test(X)
| complement('SKOLEMAAAV1'(X),X) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_1) ).
cnf(14,axiom,
( test(X)
| ~ complement(Y,X) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_1) ).
cnf(15,axiom,
( ~ complement(X,Y)
| multiplication(Y,X) = zero ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).
cnf(16,axiom,
( ~ complement(X,Y)
| multiplication(X,Y) = zero ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).
cnf(17,axiom,
( ~ complement(X,Y)
| addition(X,Y) = one ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).
cnf(18,axiom,
( complement(X,Y)
| multiplication(Y,X) != zero
| multiplication(X,Y) != zero
| addition(X,Y) != one ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).
cnf(19,axiom,
( ~ test(X)
| c(X) != Y
| complement(X,Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_3) ).
cnf(20,axiom,
( ~ test(X)
| c(X) = Y
| ~ complement(X,Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_3) ).
cnf(22,axiom,
( ~ test(X)
| ~ test(Y)
| c(addition(X,Y)) = multiplication(c(X),c(Y)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+2.ax',test_deMorgan1) ).
cnf(24,negated_conjecture,
test('SKOLEMAAAV3'),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).
cnf(25,negated_conjecture,
test('SKOLEMAAAV2'),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).
cnf(26,negated_conjecture,
( ~ leq(one,addition(multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV2'),addition(multiplication(c('SKOLEMAAAV3'),'SKOLEMAAAV2'),addition(multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV2','SKOLEMAAAV3'),addition(multiplication(c('SKOLEMAAAV2'),'SKOLEMAAAV3'),multiplication(c('SKOLEMAAAV2'),c('SKOLEMAAAV3')))))))
| ~ leq(addition(multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV2'),addition(multiplication(c('SKOLEMAAAV3'),'SKOLEMAAAV2'),addition(multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV2','SKOLEMAAAV3'),addition(multiplication(c('SKOLEMAAAV2'),'SKOLEMAAAV3'),multiplication(c('SKOLEMAAAV2'),c('SKOLEMAAAV3')))))),one) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).
cnf(27,plain,
complement('SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV3'),'SKOLEMAAAV3'),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[13,24]) ).
cnf(28,plain,
complement('SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV2'),'SKOLEMAAAV2'),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[13,25]) ).
cnf(31,plain,
leq(X,X),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[12,2]) ).
cnf(32,plain,
leq(X,addition(X,Y)),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[12,3]) ).
cnf(36,plain,
complement('SKOLEMAAAV3',c('SKOLEMAAAV3')),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[19,24,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(37,plain,
complement('SKOLEMAAAV2',c('SKOLEMAAAV2')),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[19,25,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(51,plain,
c(addition('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV2')) = multiplication(c('SKOLEMAAAV3'),c('SKOLEMAAAV2')),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[22,24,25]) ).
cnf(52,plain,
c(addition('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV2')) = multiplication(c('SKOLEMAAAV2'),c('SKOLEMAAAV3')),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[22,25,24]) ).
cnf(53,plain,
( ~ leq(one,addition(multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV2'),addition(multiplication(c('SKOLEMAAAV3'),'SKOLEMAAAV2'),addition(multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV2','SKOLEMAAAV3'),addition(multiplication(c('SKOLEMAAAV2'),'SKOLEMAAAV3'),c(addition('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV2')))))))
| ~ leq(addition(multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV2'),addition(multiplication(c('SKOLEMAAAV3'),'SKOLEMAAAV2'),addition(multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV2','SKOLEMAAAV3'),addition(multiplication(c('SKOLEMAAAV2'),'SKOLEMAAAV3'),c(addition('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV2')))))),one) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[26,52,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(106,plain,
addition('SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV3'),'SKOLEMAAAV3') = one,
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[17,27]) ).
cnf(108,plain,
multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV3'),'SKOLEMAAAV3') = zero,
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[16,27]) ).
cnf(109,plain,
multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV3')) = zero,
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[15,27]) ).
cnf(111,plain,
addition('SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV2'),'SKOLEMAAAV2') = one,
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[17,28]) ).
cnf(113,plain,
multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV2'),'SKOLEMAAAV2') = zero,
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[16,28]) ).
cnf(114,plain,
multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV2','SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV2')) = zero,
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[15,28]) ).
cnf(116,plain,
test(c('SKOLEMAAAV3')),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[14,36]) ).
cnf(121,plain,
test(c('SKOLEMAAAV2')),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[14,37]) ).
cnf(122,plain,
addition('SKOLEMAAAV2',c('SKOLEMAAAV2')) = one,
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[17,37]) ).
cnf(134,plain,
c(addition(c('SKOLEMAAAV3'),'SKOLEMAAAV2')) = multiplication(c(c('SKOLEMAAAV3')),c('SKOLEMAAAV2')),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[22,116,25]) ).
cnf(137,plain,
c(addition(c('SKOLEMAAAV3'),'SKOLEMAAAV2')) = multiplication(c('SKOLEMAAAV2'),c(c('SKOLEMAAAV3'))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[22,116,25]) ).
cnf(157,plain,
c(addition(c('SKOLEMAAAV3'),c('SKOLEMAAAV2'))) = multiplication(c(c('SKOLEMAAAV2')),c(c('SKOLEMAAAV3'))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[22,121,116]) ).
cnf(159,plain,
c(addition(c('SKOLEMAAAV3'),c('SKOLEMAAAV2'))) = multiplication(c(c('SKOLEMAAAV3')),c(c('SKOLEMAAAV2'))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[22,121,116]) ).
cnf(174,plain,
leq('SKOLEMAAAV3',one),
inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[32,106,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(178,plain,
X = addition(multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV3'),X),multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV3',X)),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[8,106,theory(equality)]),6,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(182,plain,
complement('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV3')),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[18,106,theory(equality)]),109,108,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(183,plain,
addition(one,'SKOLEMAAAV3') = one,
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[11,174]) ).
cnf(188,plain,
c('SKOLEMAAAV3') = 'SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV3'),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[20,182,24]) ).
cnf(189,plain,
complement(c('SKOLEMAAAV3'),'SKOLEMAAAV3'),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[27,188,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(194,plain,
X = addition(multiplication(c('SKOLEMAAAV3'),X),multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV3',X)),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[178,188,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(196,plain,
( ~ leq(one,addition(multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV2','SKOLEMAAAV3'),addition(multiplication(c('SKOLEMAAAV2'),'SKOLEMAAAV3'),addition(c(addition('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV2')),'SKOLEMAAAV2'))))
| ~ leq(addition(multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV2','SKOLEMAAAV3'),addition(multiplication(c('SKOLEMAAAV2'),'SKOLEMAAAV3'),addition(c(addition('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV2')),'SKOLEMAAAV2'))),one) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[53,194,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(199,plain,
c(c('SKOLEMAAAV3')) = 'SKOLEMAAAV3',
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[20,189,116]) ).
cnf(201,plain,
c(addition(c('SKOLEMAAAV3'),'SKOLEMAAAV2')) = multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV3',c('SKOLEMAAAV2')),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[134,199,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(206,plain,
c(addition(c('SKOLEMAAAV3'),'SKOLEMAAAV2')) = multiplication(c('SKOLEMAAAV2'),'SKOLEMAAAV3'),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[137,199,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(207,plain,
( ~ leq(one,addition(multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV2','SKOLEMAAAV3'),addition(c(addition(c('SKOLEMAAAV3'),'SKOLEMAAAV2')),addition(c(addition('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV2')),'SKOLEMAAAV2'))))
| ~ leq(addition(multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV2','SKOLEMAAAV3'),addition(c(addition(c('SKOLEMAAAV3'),'SKOLEMAAAV2')),addition(c(addition('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV2')),'SKOLEMAAAV2'))),one) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[196,206,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(216,plain,
c(addition(c('SKOLEMAAAV3'),c('SKOLEMAAAV2'))) = multiplication(c(c('SKOLEMAAAV2')),'SKOLEMAAAV3'),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[157,199,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(217,plain,
c(addition(c('SKOLEMAAAV3'),c('SKOLEMAAAV2'))) = multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV3',c(c('SKOLEMAAAV2'))),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[159,199,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(221,plain,
leq('SKOLEMAAAV2',one),
inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[32,111,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(229,plain,
complement('SKOLEMAAAV2','SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV2')),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[18,111,theory(equality)]),114,113,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(230,plain,
addition(one,'SKOLEMAAAV2') = one,
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[11,221]) ).
cnf(231,plain,
addition('SKOLEMAAAV2',addition(one,X)) = addition(one,X),
inference('EMBED',[status(thm)],[230]) ).
cnf(235,plain,
c('SKOLEMAAAV2') = 'SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV2'),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[20,229,25]) ).
cnf(236,plain,
complement(c('SKOLEMAAAV2'),'SKOLEMAAAV2'),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[28,235,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(245,plain,
c(c('SKOLEMAAAV2')) = 'SKOLEMAAAV2',
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[20,236,121]) ).
cnf(257,plain,
c(addition(c('SKOLEMAAAV3'),c('SKOLEMAAAV2'))) = multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV2','SKOLEMAAAV3'),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[216,245,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(259,plain,
( ~ leq(one,addition(c(addition(c('SKOLEMAAAV3'),c('SKOLEMAAAV2'))),addition(c(addition(c('SKOLEMAAAV3'),'SKOLEMAAAV2')),addition(c(addition('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV2')),'SKOLEMAAAV2'))))
| ~ leq(addition(c(addition(c('SKOLEMAAAV3'),c('SKOLEMAAAV2'))),addition(c(addition(c('SKOLEMAAAV3'),'SKOLEMAAAV2')),addition(c(addition('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV2')),'SKOLEMAAAV2'))),one) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[207,257,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(260,plain,
c(addition(c('SKOLEMAAAV3'),c('SKOLEMAAAV2'))) = multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV2'),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[217,245,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(311,plain,
X = addition(X,multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV3',X)),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[8,183,theory(equality)]),6,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(312,plain,
addition(X,addition(multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV3',X),Y)) = addition(X,Y),
inference('EMBED',[status(thm)],[311]) ).
cnf(501,plain,
one = addition(one,c(addition(c('SKOLEMAAAV3'),c('SKOLEMAAAV2')))),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[231,312,theory(equality)]),260,230,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(1400,plain,
c('SKOLEMAAAV2') = addition(c(addition('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV2')),c(addition(c('SKOLEMAAAV3'),'SKOLEMAAAV2'))),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[194,51,theory(equality)]),201,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(1402,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[259,31,501,122,1400,theory(equality)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : KLE010+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 11:51:35 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.46 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.47 *
% 0.21/0.47 *
% 0.21/0.48 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.21/0.48 *
% 0.21/0.48 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.21/0.48 *
% 0.21/0.48 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.21/0.48 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.21/0.48 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.21/0.48 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.48 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.48 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.21/0.48 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.21/0.48 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.21/0.48 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.21/0.48 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.21/0.48 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.21/0.48 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.21/0.48 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.21/0.48 *
% 0.21/0.48 "."
% 0.21/0.48 *
% 0.21/0.48 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-16T11:51:36
% 0.21/0.48 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n027.cluster.edu at 2022-06-16T11:51:36
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 ; Recognized commutativity assertion (= (|addition| ?X ?Y) (|addition| ?Y ?X)).
% 0.21/0.49 ; Recognized associativity assertion (= (|addition| ?X (|addition| ?Y ?Z)) (|addition| (|addition| ?X ?Y) ?Z)).
% 0.21/0.49 ; Recognized right identity assertion (= (|addition| ?X |zero|) ?X).
% 0.21/0.49 ; Recognized associativity assertion (= (|multiplication| ?X (|multiplication| ?Y ?Z)) (|multiplication| (|multiplication| ?X ?Y) ?Z)).
% 0.21/0.49 ; Recognized right identity assertion (= (|multiplication| ?X |one|) ?X).
% 0.21/0.49 ; Recognized left identity assertion (= (|multiplication| |one| ?X) ?X).
% 0.21/0.49 ; Declaring addition to be commutative.
% 2.59/2.77 ; Declaring addition to be associative-commutative.
% 2.59/2.77
% 2.59/2.77 #||
% 2.59/2.77 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.59/2.77 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 2.59/2.78 ||#
% 2.59/2.78
% 2.59/2.78 ; Summary of computation:
% 2.59/2.78 ; 10733 formulas have been input or derived (from 201 formulas).
% 2.59/2.78 ; 1402 (13%) were retained. Of these,
% 2.59/2.78 ; 150 (11%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 2.59/2.78 ; 1252 (89%) are still being kept.
% 2.59/2.78 ;
% 2.59/2.78 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 2.59/2.78 ; 0.006 0% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 2.59/2.78 ; 0.001 0% Assert (19 calls)
% 2.59/2.78 ; 0.136 6% Process new row (10,369 calls)
% 2.59/2.78 ; 0.048 2% Resolution (400 calls)
% 2.59/2.78 ; 0.120 5% Paramodulation (200 calls)
% 2.59/2.78 ; 0.000 0% Factoring (4 calls)
% 2.59/2.78 ; 0.000 0% Embedding (118 calls)
% 2.59/2.78 ; 0.051 2% Condensing (997 calls)
% 2.59/2.78 ; 0.047 2% Forward subsumption (997 calls)
% 2.59/2.78 ; 0.014 1% Backward subsumption (417 calls)
% 2.59/2.78 ; 0.018 1% Clause clause subsumption (3,048 calls)
% 2.59/2.78 ; 1.738 76% Forward simplification (10,226 calls)
% 2.59/2.78 ; 0.017 1% Backward simplification (1,299 calls)
% 2.59/2.78 ; 0.019 1% Ordering (6,312 calls)
% 2.59/2.78 ; 0.012 1% Ordering ac (891 calls)
% 2.59/2.78 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 2.59/2.78 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 2.59/2.78 ; 0.068 3% Other
% 2.59/2.78 ; 2.295 Total
% 2.59/2.78 ; 2.305 Real time
% 2.59/2.78 ;
% 2.59/2.78 ; Term-hash-array has 2,903 terms in all.
% 2.59/2.78 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 382 entries (384 at peak, 417 added, 35 deleted).
% 2.59/2.78 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,740 nodes (1,771 at peak, 2,045 added, 305 deleted).
% 2.59/2.78 ; Retrieved 3,955 possibly forward subsuming rows in 997 calls.
% 2.59/2.78 ; Retrieved 518 possibly backward subsumed rows in 417 calls.
% 2.59/2.78 ; Path-index has 2,628 entries (2,630 at peak, 2,940 added, 312 deleted).
% 2.59/2.78 ; Path-index has 795 nodes (799 at peak, 1,025 added, 230 deleted).
% 2.59/2.78 ; Trie-index has 2,628 entries (2,630 at peak, 2,940 added, 312 deleted).
% 2.59/2.78 ; Trie-index has 1,411 nodes (1,417 at peak, 1,827 added, 416 deleted).
% 2.59/2.78 ; Retrieved 1,871,356 generalization terms in 66,688 calls.
% 2.59/2.78 ; Retrieved 2,950 instance terms in 899 calls.
% 2.59/2.78 ; Retrieved 41,146 unifiable terms in 2,320 calls.
% 2.59/2.78 ;
% 2.59/2.78 ; The agenda of rows to process has 20 entries:
% 2.59/2.78 ; 2 with value 22 3 with value 25 1 with value 30
% 2.59/2.78 ; 2 with value 23 2 with value 26 2 with value 47
% 2.59/2.78 ; 7 with value 24 1 with value 27
% 2.59/2.78 ; The agenda of rows to give has 1075 entries:
% 2.59/2.78 ; 39 with value (4 17) 36 with value (4 32) 8 with value (4 56)
% 2.59/2.78 ; 40 with value (4 18) 22 with value (4 33) 8 with value (4 58)
% 2.59/2.78 ; 90 with value (4 19) 36 with value (4 34) 5 with value (4 59)
% 2.59/2.78 ; 108 with value (4 20) 8 with value (4 35) 1 with value (4 61)
% 2.59/2.78 ; 76 with value (4 21) 20 with value (4 36) 4 with value (4 62)
% 2.59/2.78 ; 33 with value (4 22) 12 with value (4 37) 8 with value (4 63)
% 2.59/2.78 ; 71 with value (4 23) 5 with value (4 38) 8 with value (4 65)
% 2.59/2.78 ; 64 with value (4 24) 16 with value (4 39) 8 with value (4 70)
% 2.59/2.78 ; 87 with value (4 25) 2 with value (4 41) 8 with value (4 77)
% 2.59/2.78 ; 50 with value (4 26) 8 with value (4 42) 2 with value (4 79)
% 2.59/2.78 ; 54 with value (4 27) 4 with value (4 45) 8 with value (4 84)
% 2.59/2.78 ; 31 with value (4 28) 2 with value (4 51) 8 with value (4 97)
% 2.59/2.78 ; 24 with value (4 29) 8 with value (4 53) 8 with value (4 104)
% 2.59/2.78 ; 24 with value (4 30) 4 with value (4 55) 1 with value (4 107)
% 2.59/2.78 ; 16 with value (4 31)
% 2.59/2.78 Evaluation took:
% 2.59/2.78 2.305 seconds of real time
% 2.59/2.78 2.220247 seconds of user run time
% 2.59/2.78 0.085215 seconds of system run time
% 2.59/2.78 [Run times include 0.101 seconds GC run time.]
% 2.59/2.78 0 calls to %EVAL
% 2.59/2.78 0 page faults and
% 2.59/2.78 256,568,032 bytes consed.
% 2.59/2.78 :PROOF-FOUND
% 2.59/2.78 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-16T11:51:38
% 2.59/2.78 :PROOF-FOUND
% 2.59/2.78 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------