TSTP Solution File: KLE005+1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : KLE005+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:04:34 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 20 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 48 ( 25 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 47 ( 19 ~; 17 |; 6 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 0 sgn; 13 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(test_3,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( test(X4)
=> ( c(X4) = X5
<=> complement(X4,X5) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.mznGFMUlrv/E---3.1_8189.p',test_3) ).
fof(test_4,axiom,
! [X4] :
( ~ test(X4)
=> c(X4) = zero ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.mznGFMUlrv/E---3.1_8189.p',test_4) ).
fof(test_2,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( complement(X5,X4)
<=> ( multiplication(X4,X5) = zero
& multiplication(X5,X4) = zero
& addition(X4,X5) = one ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.mznGFMUlrv/E---3.1_8189.p',test_2) ).
fof(goals,conjecture,
c(one) = zero,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.mznGFMUlrv/E---3.1_8189.p',goals) ).
fof(multiplicative_left_identity,axiom,
! [X1] : multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.mznGFMUlrv/E---3.1_8189.p',multiplicative_left_identity) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X9,X10] :
( ( c(X9) != X10
| complement(X9,X10)
| ~ test(X9) )
& ( ~ complement(X9,X10)
| c(X9) = X10
| ~ test(X9) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X4] :
( ~ test(X4)
=> c(X4) = zero ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[test_4]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X14,X15] :
( ( multiplication(X14,X15) = zero
| ~ complement(X15,X14) )
& ( multiplication(X15,X14) = zero
| ~ complement(X15,X14) )
& ( addition(X14,X15) = one
| ~ complement(X15,X14) )
& ( multiplication(X14,X15) != zero
| multiplication(X15,X14) != zero
| addition(X14,X15) != one
| complement(X15,X14) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_2])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( complement(X1,X2)
| c(X1) != X2
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
c(one) != zero,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X11] :
( test(X11)
| c(X11) = zero ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X13] : multiplication(one,X13) = X13,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_left_identity]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( multiplication(X1,X2) = zero
| ~ complement(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( complement(X1,c(X1))
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
c(one) != zero,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( test(X1)
| c(X1) = zero ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( multiplication(X1,c(X1)) = zero
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
test(one),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]),c_0_14]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : KLE005+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 04:43:41 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.mznGFMUlrv/E---3.1_8189.p
% 0.21/0.50 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # new_bool_1 with pid 8345 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.50 # Search class: FGUSM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18--C_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # G-E--_208_C18--C_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 8350 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18--C_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.50 # Search class: FGUSM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18--C_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.50 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 17
% 0.21/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses : 21
% 0.21/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 21
% 0.21/0.50 # Processed clauses : 38
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 38
% 0.21/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Generated clauses : 10
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6
% 0.21/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Paramodulations : 9
% 0.21/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 16
% 0.21/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.21/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 8
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 10
% 0.21/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 18
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 21
% 0.21/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 9
% 0.21/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9
% 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 9
% 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 6
% 0.21/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 978
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1776 pages
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1692 pages
% 0.21/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------