TSTP Solution File: KLE005+1 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : KLE005+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:25:31 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.60s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (   8 unt;   9 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   48 (  25 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   47 (  19   ~;  17   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   11 (   7   >;   4   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (   0 sgn;  13   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    addition: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    zero: $i ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    multiplication: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    one: $i ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    leq: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    test: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    complement: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    c: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    esk1_1: $i > $i ).

fof(test_3,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( test(X4)
     => ( c(X4) = X5
      <=> complement(X4,X5) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_3) ).

fof(test_4,axiom,
    ! [X4] :
      ( ~ test(X4)
     => c(X4) = zero ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_4) ).

fof(test_2,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( complement(X5,X4)
    <=> ( multiplication(X4,X5) = zero
        & multiplication(X5,X4) = zero
        & addition(X4,X5) = one ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    c(one) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(multiplicative_left_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_left_identity) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X34,X35] :
      ( ( c(X34) != X35
        | complement(X34,X35)
        | ~ test(X34) )
      & ( ~ complement(X34,X35)
        | c(X34) = X35
        | ~ test(X34) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_3])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X4] :
      ( ~ test(X4)
     => c(X4) = zero ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[test_4]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X32,X33] :
      ( ( multiplication(X32,X33) = zero
        | ~ complement(X33,X32) )
      & ( multiplication(X33,X32) = zero
        | ~ complement(X33,X32) )
      & ( addition(X32,X33) = one
        | ~ complement(X33,X32) )
      & ( multiplication(X32,X33) != zero
        | multiplication(X33,X32) != zero
        | addition(X32,X33) != one
        | complement(X33,X32) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_2])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( complement(X1,X2)
    | c(X1) != X2
    | ~ test(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    c(one) != zero,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X36] :
      ( test(X36)
      | c(X36) = zero ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X17] : multiplication(one,X17) = X17,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_left_identity]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( multiplication(X1,X2) = zero
    | ~ complement(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( complement(X1,c(X1))
    | ~ test(X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    c(one) != zero,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( test(X1)
    | c(X1) = zero ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( multiplication(X1,c(X1)) = zero
    | ~ test(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    test(one),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]),c_0_14]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : KLE005+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 29 11:10:26 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.58  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.60  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.21/0.60  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.60  % Proof found
% 0.21/0.60  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.60  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.60  % Total time : 0.007000 s
% 0.21/0.60  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.21/0.60  % Total time : 0.010000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------