TSTP Solution File: KLE005+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : KLE005+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:44:38 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.26s 1.81s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (   7 unt;   9 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   26 (  14 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   19 (   8   ~;   5   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   11 (   7   >;   4   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (;  12   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ leq > complement > test > multiplication > addition > #nlpp > c > zero > one > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i > $i ).

tff(c,type,
    c: $i > $i ).

tff(multiplication,type,
    multiplication: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(addition,type,
    addition: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(complement,type,
    complement: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(test,type,
    test: $i > $o ).

tff(one,type,
    one: $i ).

tff(leq,type,
    leq: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(zero,type,
    zero: $i ).

tff(f_135,negated_conjecture,
    c(one) != zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

tff(f_131,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ test(X0)
     => ( c(X0) = zero ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_4) ).

tff(f_126,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( test(X0)
     => ( ( c(X0) = X1 )
      <=> complement(X0,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_3) ).

tff(f_120,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( complement(X1,X0)
    <=> ( ( multiplication(X0,X1) = zero )
        & ( multiplication(X1,X0) = zero )
        & ( addition(X0,X1) = one ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).

tff(f_62,axiom,
    ! [A] : ( multiplication(A,one) = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

tff(c_46,plain,
    c(one) != zero,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_135]) ).

tff(c_44,plain,
    ! [X0_31] :
      ( ( c(X0_31) = zero )
      | test(X0_31) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_131]) ).

tff(c_42,plain,
    ! [X0_29] :
      ( complement(X0_29,c(X0_29))
      | ~ test(X0_29) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_126]) ).

tff(c_275,plain,
    ! [X0_53,X1_54] :
      ( ( multiplication(X0_53,X1_54) = zero )
      | ~ complement(X1_54,X0_53) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_120]) ).

tff(c_289,plain,
    ! [X0_57] :
      ( ( multiplication(c(X0_57),X0_57) = zero )
      | ~ test(X0_57) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_42,c_275]) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    ! [A_11] : ( multiplication(A_11,one) = A_11 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_62]) ).

tff(c_300,plain,
    ( ( c(one) = zero )
    | ~ test(one) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_289,c_12]) ).

tff(c_314,plain,
    ~ test(one),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_46,c_300]) ).

tff(c_320,plain,
    c(one) = zero,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_44,c_314]) ).

tff(c_324,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_46,c_320]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem  : KLE005+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.17/0.36  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 23:35:44 EDT 2023
% 0.17/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.26/1.81  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.26/1.81  
% 3.26/1.81  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.26/1.83  
% 3.26/1.83  Inference rules
% 3.26/1.83  ----------------------
% 3.26/1.83  #Ref     : 0
% 3.26/1.83  #Sup     : 60
% 3.26/1.83  #Fact    : 0
% 3.26/1.83  #Define  : 0
% 3.26/1.83  #Split   : 0
% 3.26/1.83  #Chain   : 0
% 3.26/1.83  #Close   : 0
% 3.26/1.83  
% 3.26/1.83  Ordering : KBO
% 3.26/1.83  
% 3.26/1.83  Simplification rules
% 3.26/1.83  ----------------------
% 3.26/1.84  #Subsume      : 0
% 3.26/1.84  #Demod        : 8
% 3.26/1.84  #Tautology    : 49
% 3.26/1.84  #SimpNegUnit  : 3
% 3.26/1.84  #BackRed      : 0
% 3.26/1.84  
% 3.26/1.84  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.26/1.84  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.26/1.84  
% 3.26/1.84  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.26/1.84  ----------------------
% 3.26/1.84  Preprocessing        : 0.50
% 3.26/1.84  Parsing              : 0.27
% 3.26/1.84  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 3.26/1.84  Main loop            : 0.27
% 3.26/1.84  Inferencing          : 0.10
% 3.26/1.84  Reduction            : 0.08
% 3.26/1.84  Demodulation         : 0.06
% 3.26/1.84  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.26/1.84  Subsumption          : 0.05
% 3.26/1.84  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.26/1.84  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.26/1.84  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.26/1.84  Total                : 0.81
% 3.26/1.84  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.26/1.84  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.26/1.84  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.26/1.84  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------