TSTP Solution File: KLE003+1 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : KLE003+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:21:37 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.69s 0.98s
% Output : Refutation 0.69s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : KLE003+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 12:36:53 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.69/0.97 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.69/0.97 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.69/0.97 Process 382 was started by sandbox on n005.cluster.edu,
% 0.69/0.97 Thu Jun 16 12:36:54 2022
% 0.69/0.97 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_32696_n005.cluster.edu".
% 0.69/0.97 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.69/0.97
% 0.69/0.97 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.69/0.97
% 0.69/0.97 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_32696_n005.cluster.edu
% 0.69/0.97
% 0.69/0.97 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.69/0.97 set(auto2).
% 0.69/0.97 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.69/0.97 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.69/0.97 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.69/0.97 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.69/0.97 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.69/0.97 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.69/0.97 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.69/0.97 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.69/0.97 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.69/0.97 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.69/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.69/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.69/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.69/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.69/0.97 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.69/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.69/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.69/0.97 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.69/0.97 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.69/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.69/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.69/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.69/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.69/0.97 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.69/0.97 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.69/0.97 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.69/0.97 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.69/0.97 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.69/0.97 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.69/0.97 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.69/0.97 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.69/0.97 clear(print_given).
% 0.69/0.97
% 0.69/0.97 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (13 formulas)
% 0.69/0.97
% 0.69/0.97 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.69/0.97
% 0.69/0.97 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.69/0.97
% 0.69/0.97 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.69/0.98
% 0.69/0.98 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.69/0.98 1 (all A all B addition(A,B) = addition(B,A)) # label(additive_commutativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.69/0.98 2 (all C all B all A addition(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(addition(A,B),C)) # label(additive_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.69/0.98 3 (all A addition(A,zero) = A) # label(additive_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.69/0.98 4 (all A addition(A,A) = A) # label(additive_idempotence) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.69/0.98 5 (all A all B all C multiplication(A,multiplication(B,C)) = multiplication(multiplication(A,B),C)) # label(multiplicative_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.69/0.98 6 (all A multiplication(A,one) = A) # label(multiplicative_right_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.69/0.98 7 (all A multiplication(one,A) = A) # label(multiplicative_left_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.69/0.98 8 (all A all B all C multiplication(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C))) # label(right_distributivity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.69/0.98 9 (all A all B all C multiplication(addition(A,B),C) = addition(multiplication(A,C),multiplication(B,C))) # label(left_distributivity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.69/0.98 10 (all A multiplication(A,zero) = zero) # label(right_annihilation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.69/0.98 11 (all A multiplication(zero,A) = zero) # label(left_annihilation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.69/0.98 12 (all A all B (leq(A,B) <-> addition(A,B) = B)) # label(order) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.69/0.98 13 -((all X0 addition(X0,X0) = X0) <-> addition(one,one) = one) # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.69/0.98
% 0.69/0.98 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.69/0.98
% 0.69/0.98 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.69/0.98
% 0.69/0.98 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.69/0.98 14 leq(A,B) | addition(A,B) != B # label(order) # label(axiom). [clausify(12)].
% 0.69/0.98 15 -leq(A,B) | addition(A,B) = B # label(order) # label(axiom). [clausify(12)].
% 0.69/0.98
% 0.69/0.98 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.69/0.98
% 0.69/0.98 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.69/0.98
% 0.69/0.98 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.69/0.98 Function symbol KB weights: one=1. zero=1. c1=1. addition=1. multiplication=1.
% 0.69/0.98
% 0.69/0.98 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.69/0.98 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.69/0.98 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.69/0.98
% 0.69/0.98 % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.69/0.98 % Length of proof is 5.
% 0.69/0.98 % Level of proof is 2.
% 0.69/0.98 % Maximum clause weight is 5.000.
% 0.69/0.98 % Given clauses 0.
% 0.69/0.98
% 0.69/0.98 4 (all A addition(A,A) = A) # label(additive_idempotence) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.69/0.98 13 -((all X0 addition(X0,X0) = X0) <-> addition(one,one) = one) # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.69/0.98 17 addition(A,A) = A # label(additive_idempotence) # label(axiom). [clausify(4)].
% 0.69/0.98 31 addition(c1,c1) != c1 | addition(one,one) != one # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(13)].
% 0.69/0.98 32 $F. [copy(31),rewrite([17(3),17(6)]),xx(a),xx(b)].
% 0.69/0.98
% 0.69/0.98 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.69/0.98 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.69/0.98
% 0.69/0.98 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.69/0.98
% 0.69/0.98 Given=0. Generated=13. Kept=11. proofs=1.
% 0.69/0.98 Usable=0. Sos=0. Demods=11. Limbo=11, Disabled=15. Hints=0.
% 0.69/0.98 Megabytes=0.04.
% 0.69/0.98 User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.69/0.98
% 0.69/0.98 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.69/0.98
% 0.69/0.98 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.69/0.98
% 0.69/0.98 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.69/0.98 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.69/0.98
% 0.69/0.98 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.69/0.98
% 0.69/0.98 Process 382 exit (max_proofs) Thu Jun 16 12:36:54 2022
% 0.69/0.98 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------