TSTP Solution File: KLE002+1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : KLE002+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eX7zpklJFB true
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:38:12 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.60s 0.78s
% Output : Refutation 0.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 8 unt; 6 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 18 ( 8 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 81 ( 6 ~; 2 |; 0 &; 70 @)
% ( 1 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 5 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 6 ( 6 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 8 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 ^; 18 !; 0 ?; 18 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(multiplication_type,type,
multiplication: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(addition_type,type,
addition: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(sk__type,type,
sk_: $i ).
thf(sk__2_type,type,
sk__2: $i ).
thf(sk__1_type,type,
sk__1: $i ).
thf(leq_type,type,
leq: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(order,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( leq @ A @ B )
<=> ( ( addition @ A @ B )
= B ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl12,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( leq @ X0 @ X1 )
| ( ( addition @ X0 @ X1 )
!= X1 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[order]) ).
thf(goals,conjecture,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( leq @ X0 @ X1 )
=> ( leq @ ( multiplication @ X0 @ X2 ) @ ( multiplication @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( leq @ X0 @ X1 )
=> ( leq @ ( multiplication @ X0 @ X2 ) @ ( multiplication @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[goals]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl13,plain,
~ ( leq @ ( multiplication @ sk_ @ sk__2 ) @ ( multiplication @ sk__1 @ sk__2 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl28,plain,
( ( addition @ ( multiplication @ sk_ @ sk__2 ) @ ( multiplication @ sk__1 @ sk__2 ) )
!= ( multiplication @ sk__1 @ sk__2 ) ),
inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl12,zip_derived_cl13]) ).
thf(left_distributivity,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( multiplication @ ( addition @ A @ B ) @ C )
= ( addition @ ( multiplication @ A @ C ) @ ( multiplication @ B @ C ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl8,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( multiplication @ ( addition @ X0 @ X2 ) @ X1 )
= ( addition @ ( multiplication @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( multiplication @ X2 @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[left_distributivity]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl14,plain,
leq @ sk_ @ sk__1,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl11,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( ( addition @ X1 @ X0 )
= X0 )
| ~ ( leq @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[order]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl29,plain,
( ( addition @ sk_ @ sk__1 )
= sk__1 ),
inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl14,zip_derived_cl11]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl92,plain,
( ( multiplication @ sk__1 @ sk__2 )
!= ( multiplication @ sk__1 @ sk__2 ) ),
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl28,zip_derived_cl8,zip_derived_cl29]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl93,plain,
$false,
inference(simplify,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl92]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : KLE002+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.eX7zpklJFB true
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 12:17:11 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.36 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.36 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.36 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.36 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.36 % Running in FO mode
% 0.58/0.68 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.58/0.68 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.58/0.68 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.59/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.59/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.59/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.59/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.59/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.59/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.59/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.60/0.78 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.60/0.78 % BCE start: 15
% 0.60/0.78 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.60/0.78 % PE start: 15
% 0.60/0.78 logic: eq
% 0.60/0.78 % PE eliminated: 1
% 0.60/0.78 % done 17 iterations in 0.018s
% 0.60/0.78 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.60/0.78 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.60/0.78
% 0.60/0.78
% 0.60/0.78 % Terminating...
% 0.62/0.87 % Runner terminated.
% 0.62/0.88 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------