TSTP Solution File: ITP334_1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : ITP001_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v8.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 00:35:07 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.71s 0.92s
% Output   : Refutation 0.71s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named 'CODE-FOR-$$PRODUCT')

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf('$$LESSEQ-IS-REFLEXIVE',axiom,
    $lesseq(X,X) ).

tff(31,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ $less(0,'fun_app$h'('of_nat$','card$'('top$')))
    | ~ $less($difference('fun_app$h'('of_nat$','card$'('top$')),$sum(0,1)),'fun_app$h'('of_nat$','card$'('top$'))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conjecture7) ).

tff(32,plain,
    ( ~ $less(0,'fun_app$h'('of_nat$','card$'('top$')))
    | ~ $less($sum(-1,'fun_app$h'('of_nat$','card$'('top$'))),'fun_app$h'('of_nat$','card$'('top$'))) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[31,'CODE-FOR-$$PRODUCT','CODE-FOR-$$UMINUS','CODE-FOR-$$DIFFERENCE','CODE-FOR-$$SUM']) ).

tff(389,axiom,
    $less(0,'fun_app$h'('of_nat$','card$'('top$'))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom139) ).

tff(907,axiom,
    ! [X: $int,Y: $int] :
      ( ~ $lesseq(X,$difference(Y,1))
      | $less(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom564) ).

tff(908,plain,
    ! [X: $int,Y: $int] :
      ( ~ $lesseq(X,$sum(-1,Y))
      | $less(X,Y) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[907,'CODE-FOR-$$SUM','CODE-FOR-$$PRODUCT','CODE-FOR-$$UMINUS','CODE-FOR-$$DIFFERENCE']) ).

tff(966,plain,
    ~ $less($sum(-1,'fun_app$h'('of_nat$','card$'('top$'))),'fun_app$h'('of_nat$','card$'('top$'))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[32,389]) ).

tff(1055,plain,
    ! [X: $int] : $less($sum(-1,X),X),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[908,'$$LESSEQ-IS-REFLEXIVE']) ).

cnf(1056,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[966,1055]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : ITP001_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v8.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun  2 21:48:09 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.47  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.18/0.47  * 
% 0.18/0.47  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.18/0.47  * 
% 0.18/0.47  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.18/0.47   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.18/0.47   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.18/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.47   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.18/0.47   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.18/0.47   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.18/0.47   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.18/0.47   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.18/0.47   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.18/0.47   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.18/0.47   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.18/0.47  * 
% 0.18/0.47  "."
% 0.18/0.47  * 
% 0.18/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-02T21:48:09
% 0.18/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n028.cluster.edu at 2022-06-02T21:48:09
% 0.47/0.67  WARNING:
% 0.47/0.67     DECLARE-PROPOSITION is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.71/0.92  
% 0.71/0.92  
% 0.71/0.92  #||
% 0.71/0.92  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.71/0.92  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.71/0.92  ||#
% 0.71/0.92  
% 0.71/0.92  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.71/0.92  ;      2060 formulas have been input or derived (from 164 formulas).
% 0.71/0.92  ;      1056 (51%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.71/0.92  ;          458 (43%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.71/0.92  ;          598 (57%) are still being kept.
% 0.71/0.92  ; 
% 0.71/0.92  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.71/0.92  ;     0.156  35%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.71/0.92  ;     0.024   5%   Assert                       (623 calls)
% 0.71/0.92  ;     0.068  15%   Process new row              (1,582 calls)
% 0.71/0.92  ;     0.017   4%   Resolution                   (326 calls)
% 0.71/0.92  ;     0.000   0%   Paramodulation               (163 calls)
% 0.71/0.92  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (17 calls)
% 0.71/0.92  ;     0.023   5%   Condensing                   (901 calls)
% 0.71/0.92  ;     0.031   7%   Forward subsumption          (901 calls)
% 0.71/0.92  ;     0.020   4%   Backward subsumption         (551 calls)
% 0.71/0.92  ;     0.015   3%   Clause clause subsumption    (1,321 calls)
% 0.71/0.92  ;     0.053  12%   Forward simplification       (1,579 calls)
% 0.71/0.92  ;     0.003   1%   Backward simplification      (697 calls)
% 0.71/0.92  ;     0.000   0%   Ordering                     (369 calls)
% 0.71/0.92  ;     0.000   0%   Ordering ac                  (8 calls)
% 0.71/0.92  ;     0.005   1%   Sortal reasoning             (7,530 calls)
% 0.71/0.92  ;     0.002   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.71/0.92  ;     0.029   7%   Other
% 0.71/0.92  ;     0.446        Total
% 0.71/0.92  ;     0.447        Real time
% 0.71/0.92  ; 
% 0.71/0.92  ; Term-hash-array has 1,426 terms in all.
% 0.71/0.92  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 469 entries (469 at peak, 551 added, 82 deleted).
% 0.71/0.92  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 3,383 nodes (3,531 at peak, 4,380 added, 997 deleted).
% 0.71/0.92  ;  Retrieved 2,270 possibly forward subsuming rows in 901 calls.
% 0.71/0.92  ;  Retrieved 621 possibly backward subsumed rows in 551 calls.
% 0.71/0.92  ; Path-index has 1,405 entries (1,408 at peak, 1,606 added, 201 deleted).
% 0.71/0.92  ; Path-index has 3,531 nodes (3,533 at peak, 3,750 added, 219 deleted).
% 0.71/0.92  ; Trie-index has 1,405 entries (1,408 at peak, 1,606 added, 201 deleted).
% 0.71/0.92  ; Trie-index has 2,817 nodes (2,820 at peak, 3,079 added, 262 deleted).
% 0.71/0.92  ; Retrieved 4,116 generalization terms in 7,696 calls.
% 0.71/0.92  ; Retrieved 191 instance terms in 145 calls.
% 0.71/0.92  ; Retrieved 13,970 unifiable terms in 845 calls.
% 0.71/0.92  ; 
% 0.71/0.92  ; The agenda of rows to process has 8 entries:
% 0.71/0.92  ;     2 with value 8               1 with value 10               5 with value 12
% 0.71/0.92  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 384 entries:
% 0.71/0.92  ;     4 with value 11              5 with value 26               3 with value 42
% 0.71/0.92  ;    36 with value 12             10 with value 27               4 with value 43
% 0.71/0.92  ;    17 with value 13              3 with value 28               1 with value 44
% 0.71/0.92  ;    14 with value 14              1 with value 29               3 with value 45
% 0.71/0.92  ;     5 with value 15             56 with value 30               3 with value 46
% 0.71/0.92  ;     3 with value 16              2 with value 31               1 with value 47
% 0.71/0.92  ;     5 with value 17              4 with value 32               5 with value 53
% 0.71/0.92  ;    11 with value 18             10 with value 33               1 with value 57
% 0.71/0.92  ;     6 with value 19              4 with value 34               3 with value 68
% 0.71/0.92  ;     5 with value 20              6 with value 35               1 with value 70
% 0.71/0.92  ;    30 with value 21              2 with value 36               1 with value 71
% 0.71/0.92  ;    12 with value 22              5 with value 37               1 with value 73
% 0.71/0.92  ;     3 with value 23             21 with value 38               4 with value 74
% 0.71/0.92  ;     8 with value 24              3 with value 40               1 with value 78
% 0.71/0.92  ;    58 with value 25              1 with value 41               2 with value 80
% 0.71/0.92  ; The agenda of rows to give has 58 entries:
% 0.71/0.92  ;    14 with value (4 7)           7 with value (4 10)           5 with value (4 12)
% 0.71/0.92  ;    15 with value (4 8)           5 with value (4 11)           5 with value (4 13)
% 0.71/0.92  ;     7 with value (4 9)
% 0.71/0.92  Evaluation took:
% 0.71/0.92    0.448 seconds of real time
% 0.71/0.92    0.403914 seconds of user run time
% 0.71/0.92    0.044166 seconds of system run time
% 0.71/0.92    [Run times include 0.014 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.71/0.92    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.71/0.92    0 page faults and
% 0.71/0.92    31,538,376 bytes consed.
% 0.71/0.92  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.71/0.92  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-02T21:48:09
% 0.71/0.92  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.71/0.92  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------