TSTP Solution File: ITP224^3 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : ITP224^3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 22:17:07 EDT 2024

% Result   : ContradictoryAxioms 24.57s 7.20s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 24.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (  14 unt;   9 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   26 (  20 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   43 (   8   ~;   5   |;   3   &;  26   @)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   2 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    4 (   4   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   0   ^   6   !;   0   ?;   6   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort2,type,
    vEBT_VEBT: $tType ).

thf(decl_251,type,
    plus_plus_nat: nat > nat > nat ).

thf(decl_278,type,
    zero_zero_nat: nat ).

thf(decl_831,type,
    vEBT_invar_vebt: vEBT_VEBT > nat > $o ).

thf(decl_859,type,
    deg: nat ).

thf(decl_861,type,
    m: nat ).

thf(decl_863,type,
    na: nat ).

thf(decl_864,type,
    summary: vEBT_VEBT ).

thf(fact_72_zero__eq__add__iff__both__eq__0,axiom,
    ! [X98: nat,X99: nat] :
      ( ( zero_zero_nat
        = ( plus_plus_nat @ X98 @ X99 ) )
    <=> ( ( X98 = zero_zero_nat )
        & ( X99 = zero_zero_nat ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_72_zero__eq__add__iff__both__eq__0) ).

thf(conj_6,hypothesis,
    ( deg
    = ( plus_plus_nat @ na @ m ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_6) ).

thf(conj_5,hypothesis,
    m = na,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_5) ).

thf(conj_1,hypothesis,
    zero_zero_nat = deg,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_1) ).

thf(fact_0_Node_OIH_I2_J,axiom,
    ~ ( vEBT_invar_vebt @ summary @ zero_zero_nat ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_0_Node_OIH_I2_J) ).

thf(conj_3,hypothesis,
    vEBT_invar_vebt @ summary @ m,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_3) ).

thf(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X24438: nat,X24439: nat] :
      ( ( ( X24438 = zero_zero_nat )
        | ( zero_zero_nat
         != ( plus_plus_nat @ X24438 @ X24439 ) ) )
      & ( ( X24439 = zero_zero_nat )
        | ( zero_zero_nat
         != ( plus_plus_nat @ X24438 @ X24439 ) ) )
      & ( ( X24438 != zero_zero_nat )
        | ( X24439 != zero_zero_nat )
        | ( zero_zero_nat
          = ( plus_plus_nat @ X24438 @ X24439 ) ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_72_zero__eq__add__iff__both__eq__0])])]) ).

thf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
    ( deg
    = ( plus_plus_nat @ na @ m ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_6]) ).

thf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
    m = na,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_5]) ).

thf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
    zero_zero_nat = deg,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_1]) ).

thf(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X15: nat,X3: nat] :
      ( ( X3 = zero_zero_nat )
      | ( zero_zero_nat
       != ( plus_plus_nat @ X15 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
    ( ( plus_plus_nat @ m @ m )
    = zero_zero_nat ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_12,plain,
    ~ ( vEBT_invar_vebt @ summary @ zero_zero_nat ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_0_Node_OIH_I2_J]) ).

thf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
    vEBT_invar_vebt @ summary @ m,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_3]) ).

thf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
    m = zero_zero_nat,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_15,plain,
    ~ ( vEBT_invar_vebt @ summary @ zero_zero_nat ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

thf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : ITP224^3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime   : Sat May 18 16:52:08 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.50  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.50  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 24.57/7.20  # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 24.57/7.20  # partial match(1): HMLMSMSMSSLCHFA
% 24.57/7.20  # Preprocessing class: HMLMSMLMSSLCHFA.
% 24.57/7.20  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 24.57/7.20  # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 24.57/7.20  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 24.57/7.20  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 24.57/7.20  # Starting new_bool_2 with 300s (1) cores
% 24.57/7.20  # new_bool_2 with pid 25536 completed with status 0
% 24.57/7.20  # Result found by new_bool_2
% 24.57/7.20  # partial match(1): HMLMSMSMSSLCHFA
% 24.57/7.20  # Preprocessing class: HMLMSMLMSSLCHFA.
% 24.57/7.20  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 24.57/7.20  # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 24.57/7.20  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 24.57/7.20  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 24.57/7.20  # Starting new_bool_2 with 300s (1) cores
% 24.57/7.20  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 24.57/7.20  # Search class: HGHSM-SMLM32-DHFFFSBN
% 24.57/7.20  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 299 seconds (299 total)
% 24.57/7.20  # Starting new_ho_10 with 180s (1) cores
% 24.57/7.20  # new_ho_10 with pid 25537 completed with status 0
% 24.57/7.20  # Result found by new_ho_10
% 24.57/7.20  # partial match(1): HMLMSMSMSSLCHFA
% 24.57/7.20  # Preprocessing class: HMLMSMLMSSLCHFA.
% 24.57/7.20  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 24.57/7.20  # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 24.57/7.20  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 24.57/7.20  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 24.57/7.20  # Starting new_bool_2 with 300s (1) cores
% 24.57/7.20  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 24.57/7.20  # Search class: HGHSM-SMLM32-DHFFFSBN
% 24.57/7.20  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 299 seconds (299 total)
% 24.57/7.20  # Starting new_ho_10 with 180s (1) cores
% 24.57/7.20  # Preprocessing time       : 0.145 s
% 24.57/7.20  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 24.57/7.20  
% 24.57/7.20  # Proof found!
% 24.57/7.20  # SZS status ContradictoryAxioms
% 24.57/7.20  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 24.57/7.20  # Parsed axioms                        : 11168
% 24.57/7.20  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 7155
% 24.57/7.20  # Initial clauses                      : 7717
% 24.57/7.20  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 373
% 24.57/7.20  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 7344
% 24.57/7.20  # Processed clauses                    : 8134
% 24.57/7.20  # ...of these trivial                  : 360
% 24.57/7.20  # ...subsumed                          : 1317
% 24.57/7.20  # ...remaining for further processing  : 6457
% 24.57/7.20  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1404
% 24.57/7.20  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 24.57/7.20  # Backward-subsumed                    : 29
% 24.57/7.20  # Backward-rewritten                   : 102
% 24.57/7.20  # Generated clauses                    : 1075
% 24.57/7.20  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 637
% 24.57/7.20  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 24.57/7.20  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 21
% 24.57/7.20  # Paramodulations                      : 52
% 24.57/7.20  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 24.57/7.20  # NegExts                              : 0
% 24.57/7.20  # Equation resolutions                 : 1404
% 24.57/7.20  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 24.57/7.20  # Total rewrite steps                  : 4064
% 24.57/7.20  # ...of those cached                   : 3166
% 24.57/7.20  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 24.57/7.20  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 24.57/7.20  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 24.57/7.20  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 24.57/7.20  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 24.57/7.20  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 24.57/7.20  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 24.57/7.20  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 24.57/7.20  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 24.57/7.20  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 24.57/7.20  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 24.57/7.20  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 24.57/7.20  # Current number of processed clauses  : 164
% 24.57/7.20  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 61
% 24.57/7.20  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 24.57/7.20  #    Negative unit clauses             : 91
% 24.57/7.20  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 12
% 24.57/7.20  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4988
% 24.57/7.20  # ...number of literals in the above   : 16916
% 24.57/7.20  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 24.57/7.20  # Current number of archived clauses   : 5272
% 24.57/7.20  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10869344
% 24.57/7.20  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1296541
% 24.57/7.20  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1123
% 24.57/7.20  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 55229
% 24.57/7.20  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 24.57/7.20  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 850
% 24.57/7.20  # BW rewrite match successes           : 258
% 24.57/7.20  # Condensation attempts                : 8134
% 24.57/7.20  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 24.57/7.20  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2353510
% 24.57/7.20  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 160343
% 24.57/7.20  
% 24.57/7.20  # -------------------------------------------------
% 24.57/7.20  # User time                : 5.797 s
% 24.57/7.20  # System time              : 0.118 s
% 24.57/7.20  # Total time               : 5.915 s
% 24.57/7.20  # Maximum resident set size: 42760 pages
% 24.57/7.20  
% 24.57/7.20  # -------------------------------------------------
% 24.57/7.20  # User time                : 6.505 s
% 24.57/7.20  # System time              : 0.145 s
% 24.57/7.20  # Total time               : 6.651 s
% 24.57/7.20  # Maximum resident set size: 23116 pages
% 24.57/7.20  % E---3.1 exiting
% 24.57/7.20  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------