TSTP Solution File: ITP209_3 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : ITP209_3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 22:34:51 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.61s 0.84s
% Output : Refutation 0.61s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 22 ( 12 unt; 10 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 12 ( 11 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 6 ( 6 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of FOOLs : 1 ( 1 fml; 0 var)
% Number of types : 4 ( 3 usr)
% Number of type conns : 5 ( 3 >; 2 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 10 !; 0 ?; 10 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(type_def_5,type,
fun_a_fun_a_a: $tType ).
tff(type_def_6,type,
fun_a_a: $tType ).
tff(type_def_7,type,
a: $tType ).
tff(func_def_0,type,
aa_a_fun_a_a: ( fun_a_fun_a_a * a ) > fun_a_a ).
tff(func_def_1,type,
aa_a_a: ( fun_a_a * a ) > a ).
tff(func_def_2,type,
a2: a ).
tff(func_def_3,type,
b: a ).
tff(func_def_4,type,
c: a ).
tff(func_def_5,type,
f: fun_a_fun_a_a ).
tff(pred_def_1,type,
syntax_ac_operator_a: fun_a_fun_a_a > $o ).
tff(f22,plain,
$false,
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f21]) ).
tff(f21,plain,
aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,a2),aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,b),c)) != aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,a2),aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,b),c)),
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f20,f18]) ).
tff(f18,plain,
! [X0: a,X1: a] : ( aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,X0),X1) = aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,X1),X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
tff(f2,axiom,
! [X0: a,X1: a] : ( aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,X0),X1) = aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,X1),X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_1_commute) ).
tff(f20,plain,
aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,a2),aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,c),b)) != aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,a2),aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,b),c)),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f19,f16]) ).
tff(f16,plain,
! [X2: a,X0: a,X1: a] : ( aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,X0),aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,X1),X2)) = aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,X0),X1)),X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
tff(f4,axiom,
! [X0: a,X1: a,X2: a] : ( aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,X0),aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,X1),X2)) = aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,X0),X1)),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_3_right__assoc) ).
tff(f19,plain,
aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,a2),b)),c) != aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,a2),aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,c),b)),
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f15,f16]) ).
tff(f15,plain,
aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,a2),b)),c) != aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,a2),c)),b),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).
tff(f13,plain,
aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,a2),b)),c) != aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,a2),c)),b),
inference(flattening,[],[f12]) ).
tff(f12,negated_conjecture,
( ~ aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,a2),b)),c) = aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,a2),c)),b) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f11]) ).
tff(f11,conjecture,
aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,a2),b)),c) = aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,aa_a_a(aa_a_fun_a_a(f,a2),c)),b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : ITP209_3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Sat May 18 18:34:08 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.35 This is a TX0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.15/0.35 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.61/0.84 % (16642)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.61/0.84 % (16647)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.61/0.84 % (16646)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.61/0.84 % (16645)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.61/0.84 % (16648)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.61/0.84 % (16649)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.61/0.84 % (16644)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.61/0.84 % (16643)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.61/0.84 % (16649)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (16649)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.84 % (16649)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.61/0.84 % (16649)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.61/0.84
% 0.61/0.84 % (16649)Memory used [KB]: 1026
% 0.61/0.84 % (16649)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.61/0.84 % (16649)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.61/0.84 % (16646)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (16646)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.84 % (16646)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.61/0.84 % (16644)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.61/0.84 % (16645)First to succeed.
% 0.61/0.84 % (16647)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.61/0.84 % (16646)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.61/0.84
% 0.61/0.84 % (16646)Memory used [KB]: 1041
% 0.61/0.84 % (16646)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.61/0.84 % (16646)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.61/0.84 % (16649)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.84 % (16649)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.84 % (16646)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.84 % (16646)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.84 % (16645)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-16641"
% 0.61/0.84 % (16642)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (16642)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.84 % (16642)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.61/0.84 % (16642)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.61/0.84
% 0.61/0.84 % (16642)Memory used [KB]: 1043
% 0.61/0.84 % (16642)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.61/0.84 % (16642)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.61/0.84 % (16642)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.84 % (16642)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.84 % (16645)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.61/0.84 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.61/0.84 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.61/0.84 % (16645)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.84 % (16645)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.61/0.84 % (16645)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.61/0.84
% 0.61/0.84 % (16645)Memory used [KB]: 971
% 0.61/0.84 % (16645)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.61/0.84 % (16645)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.61/0.84 % (16641)Success in time 0.482 s
% 0.61/0.84 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------