%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Satallax---3.5
% Problem  : ITP114^1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 00:29:09 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.43s 2.61s
% Output   : Proof 2.43s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.10  % Problem  : ITP114^1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.06/0.10  % Command  : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s
% 0.10/0.29  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.29  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.29  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.10/0.29  % DateTime : Thu Jun  2 11:12:00 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.29  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.43/2.61  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.43/2.61  % Mode: mode507:USE_SINE=true:SINE_TOLERANCE=3.0:SINE_GENERALITY_THRESHOLD=0:SINE_RANK_LIMIT=1.:SINE_DEPTH=1
% 2.43/2.61  % Inferences: 3
% 2.43/2.61  % SZS output start Proof
% 2.43/2.61  thf(conj_0,conjecture,((ord_le824540014_ereal @ (g @ x)) @ (f @ x))).
% 2.43/2.61  thf(h0,negated_conjecture,(~(((ord_le824540014_ereal @ (g @ x)) @ (f @ x)))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])).
% 2.43/2.61  thf(nax74, axiom, (p74<=ford_le824540014_ereal @ (fg @ fx) @ (ff @ fx)), file('<stdin>', nax74)).
% 2.43/2.61  thf(ax9, axiom, ~(p74), file('<stdin>', ax9)).
% 2.43/2.61  thf(pax1, axiom, (p1=>![X111:a]:ford_le824540014_ereal @ (fg @ X111) @ (ff @ X111)), file('<stdin>', pax1)).
% 2.43/2.61  thf(ax82, axiom, p1, file('<stdin>', ax82)).
% 2.43/2.61  thf(c_0_4, plain, (~ford_le824540014_ereal @ (fg @ fx) @ (ff @ fx)|p74), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[nax74])])).
% 2.43/2.61  thf(c_0_5, plain, ~p74, inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax9])).
% 2.43/2.61  thf(c_0_6, plain, ![X528:a]:(~p1|ford_le824540014_ereal @ (fg @ X528) @ (ff @ X528)), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[pax1])])])).
% 2.43/2.61  thf(c_0_7, plain, (p74|~ford_le824540014_ereal @ (fg @ fx) @ (ff @ fx)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
% 2.43/2.61  thf(c_0_8, plain, ~p74, inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
% 2.43/2.61  thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X111:a]:(ford_le824540014_ereal @ (fg @ X111) @ (ff @ X111)|~p1), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
% 2.43/2.61  thf(c_0_10, plain, p1, inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax82])).
% 2.43/2.61  thf(c_0_11, plain, ~ford_le824540014_ereal @ (fg @ fx) @ (ff @ fx), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8])).
% 2.43/2.61  thf(c_0_12, plain, ![X111:a]:ford_le824540014_ereal @ (fg @ X111) @ (ff @ X111), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10])])).
% 2.43/2.61  thf(c_0_13, plain, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])]), ['proof']).
% 2.43/2.61  thf(1,plain,$false,inference(eprover,[status(thm),assumptions([h0])],[])).
% 2.43/2.61  thf(0,theorem,((ord_le824540014_ereal @ (g @ x)) @ (f @ x)),inference(contra,[status(thm),contra(discharge,[h0])],[1,h0])).
% 2.43/2.61  % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------