TSTP Solution File: ITP019+2 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : ITP019+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 17:22:14 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.50s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   64 (  45 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   65 (  29   ~;  13   |;  11   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   14 (  11   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f199,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f198,f166]) ).

fof(f166,plain,
    sF5 = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,sK2),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f157,f158]) ).

fof(f158,plain,
    sF5 = sF6,
    inference(definition_folding,[],[f124,f157,f156]) ).

fof(f156,plain,
    ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) = sF5,
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

fof(f124,plain,
    ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f88]) ).

fof(f88,plain,
    ( mem(sK2,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal))
    & ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,sK2)
    & ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) != sK2 ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2])],[f61,f87]) ).

fof(f87,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( mem(X0,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal))
        & ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X0)
        & ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) != X0 )
   => ( mem(sK2,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal))
      & ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,sK2)
      & ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) != sK2 ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f61,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( mem(X0,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal))
      & ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X0)
      & ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) != X0 ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f60]) ).

fof(f60,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X0)
      & ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) != X0
      & mem(X0,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( mem(X0,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal))
       => ( ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) != X0
         => ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X0) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f34]) ).

fof(f34,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X13] :
        ( mem(X13,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal))
       => ( ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) != X13
         => ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X13) != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f33,conjecture,
    ! [X13] :
      ( mem(X13,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal))
     => ( ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) != X13
       => ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X13) != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__NZ) ).

fof(f157,plain,
    sF6 = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,sK2),
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

fof(f198,plain,
    sF5 != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,sK2),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f197,f159]) ).

fof(f159,plain,
    sK2 != sF5,
    inference(definition_folding,[],[f123,f156]) ).

fof(f123,plain,
    ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) != sK2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f88]) ).

fof(f197,plain,
    ( sK2 = sF5
    | sF5 != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,sK2) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f169,f155]) ).

fof(f155,plain,
    mem(sK2,sF4),
    inference(definition_folding,[],[f125,f154]) ).

fof(f154,plain,
    ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal) = sF4,
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

fof(f125,plain,
    mem(sK2,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f88]) ).

fof(f169,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ mem(X0,sF4)
      | sF5 = X0
      | sF5 != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X0) ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f168,f156]) ).

fof(f168,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ mem(X0,sF4)
      | ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X0)
      | sF5 = X0 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f167,f156]) ).

fof(f167,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) = X0
      | ~ mem(X0,sF4)
      | ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X0) ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f121,f154]) ).

fof(f121,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ mem(X0,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal))
      | ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) = X0
      | ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f86]) ).

fof(f86,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ( ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) = X0
          | ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X0) )
        & ( ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X0)
          | ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) != X0 ) )
      | ~ mem(X0,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal)) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f71]) ).

fof(f71,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) = X0
      <=> ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X0) )
      | ~ mem(X0,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f53]) ).

fof(f53,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( mem(X0,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal))
     => ( ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) = X0
      <=> ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X0) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f32,axiom,
    ! [X13] :
      ( mem(X13,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal))
     => ( ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X13) = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)
      <=> ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) = X13 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__EQ__0) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem    : ITP019+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.08/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon Aug 29 23:36:52 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.48  % (15274)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.21/0.49  % (15289)ott+10_1:1_tgt=ground:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.21/0.49  % (15278)dis+10_1:1_fsd=on:sp=occurrence:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.21/0.50  % (15277)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.21/0.50  % (15298)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=177:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/177Mi)
% 0.21/0.50  % (15285)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 0.21/0.50  % (15287)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 0.21/0.50  % (15298)First to succeed.
% 0.21/0.50  % (15298)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.50  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.50  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.50  % (15298)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50  % (15298)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.50  % (15298)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.50  % (15298)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  % (15298)Memory used [KB]: 1151
% 0.21/0.50  % (15298)Time elapsed: 0.109 s
% 0.21/0.50  % (15298)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.21/0.50  % (15298)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50  % (15298)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50  % (15270)Success in time 0.143 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------