TSTP Solution File: ITP019+2 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : ITP019+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 22:48:20 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.37s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : ITP019+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 3 11:28:47 EDT 2022
% 0.19/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN
% 0.19/0.37 # and selection function PSelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.19/0.37 #
% 0.19/0.37 # Number of axioms: 45 Number of unprocessed: 45
% 0.19/0.37 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.19/0.37 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.19/0.37 # Hello from C++
% 0.19/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.19/0.37 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.19/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.19/0.37 # 45 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.19/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 3 conjectures.
% 0.19/0.37 # There are 3 start rule candidates:
% 0.19/0.37 # Found 17 unit axioms.
% 0.19/0.37 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.19/0.37 # 3 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.19/0.37 # 28 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.19/0.37 # 17 unit axiom clauses
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.19/0.37 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 3
% 0.19/0.37 # Closed tableau found in foldup close cycle with 0 folds and 2 closures done.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.37 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (ne(bool))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (ne(ind))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (ne(ty_2Enum_2Enum))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (ne(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (p(c_2Ebool_2ET))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (~p(c_2Ebool_2EF))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (mem(c_2Ebool_2EF,bool))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (mem(c_2Ebool_2ET,bool))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (mem(c_2Enum_2E0,ty_2Enum_2Enum))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_47, negated_conjecture, (ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)!=esk4_0)).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_46, negated_conjecture, (ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,esk4_0)=ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (epred1_1(X1)|~mem(X1,bool))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (mem(c_2Ebool_2E_7E,arr(bool,bool)))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_48, negated_conjecture, (mem(esk4_0,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal)))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (ap(i(X2),X1)=X1|~mem(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (ne(arr(X1,X2))|~ne(X2)|~ne(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (ne(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(X1,X2))|~ne(X2)|~ne(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (X1=X2|p(X2)|p(X1)|~mem(X2,bool)|~mem(X1,bool))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (p(X1)|p(ap(c_2Ebool_2E_7E,X1))|~mem(X1,bool))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (X1=X2|~p(X2)|~p(X1)|~mem(X2,bool)|~mem(X1,bool))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (ap(k(X2,X3),X1)=X3|~mem(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (~p(X1)|~mem(X1,bool)|~p(ap(c_2Ebool_2E_7E,X1)))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (p(X2)|mem(esk3_2(X1,X2),X1)|~ne(X1)|~mem(X2,bool))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (mem(c_2Emin_2E_3D_3D_3E,arr(bool,arr(bool,bool))))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (mem(c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C,arr(bool,arr(bool,bool))))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (mem(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,arr(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal))))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (mem(c_2Ebool_2E_21(X1),arr(arr(X1,bool),bool))|~ne(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X1)=ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)|X1!=ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)|~mem(X1,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal)))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (mem(c_2Emin_2E_3D(X1),arr(X1,arr(X1,bool)))|~ne(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_45, plain, (X1=ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)|ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X1)!=ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)|~mem(X1,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal)))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (mem(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,arr(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal),ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal))))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (p(X1)|p(ap(ap(c_2Emin_2E_3D_3D_3E,X1),X2))|~mem(X2,bool)|~mem(X1,bool))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (p(ap(ap(c_2Emin_2E_3D_3D_3E,X2),X1))|~p(X1)|~mem(X2,bool)|~mem(X1,bool))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (mem(ap(X1,X4),X3)|~mem(X4,X2)|~mem(X1,arr(X2,X3)))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (p(ap(ap(c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C,X1),X2))|~p(X2)|~p(X1)|~mem(X2,bool)|~mem(X1,bool))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (mem(esk2_2(X1,X2),X1)|p(ap(c_2Ebool_2E_21(X1),X2))|~ne(X1)|~mem(X2,arr(X1,bool)))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (p(ap(ap(c_2Emin_2E_3D(X3),X1),X2))|X1!=X2|~ne(X3)|~mem(X2,X3)|~mem(X1,X3))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (p(X1)|~mem(X2,bool)|~mem(X1,bool)|~p(ap(ap(c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C,X2),X1)))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (p(X1)|~mem(X2,bool)|~mem(X1,bool)|~p(ap(ap(c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C,X1),X2)))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (p(X2)|~p(X1)|~mem(X2,bool)|~mem(X1,bool)|~p(ap(ap(c_2Emin_2E_3D_3D_3E,X1),X2)))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (p(ap(X2,X3))|~ne(X1)|~mem(X3,X1)|~p(ap(c_2Ebool_2E_21(X1),X2))|~mem(X2,arr(X1,bool)))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (X2=X3|~ne(X1)|~mem(X3,X1)|~mem(X2,X1)|~p(ap(ap(c_2Emin_2E_3D(X1),X2),X3)))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (p(ap(c_2Ebool_2E_21(X2),X1))|~ne(X2)|~mem(X1,arr(X2,bool))|~p(ap(X1,esk2_2(X2,X1))))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (X3=X4|mem(esk1_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X1)|~mem(X4,arr(X1,X2))|~mem(X3,arr(X1,X2)))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (X1=X4|ap(X1,esk1_4(X2,X3,X1,X4))!=ap(X4,esk1_4(X2,X3,X1,X4))|~mem(X4,arr(X2,X3))|~mem(X1,arr(X2,X3)))).
% 0.19/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.37 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.37 # Found 4 steps
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_48, negated_conjecture, (mem(esk4_0,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_50, plain, (mem(esk4_0,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_45])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_92, plain, (esk4_0=ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_47])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_93, plain, (ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,esk4_0)!=ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_46])).
% 0.19/0.37 # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.37 # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.37 # Returning from population with 6 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.19/0.37 # We now have 6 tableaux to operate on
% 0.19/0.37 # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 0.19/0.37 # Proof search is over...
% 0.19/0.37 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------