TSTP Solution File: ITP019+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : ITP019+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 22:46:03 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 1.33s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   17 (  16 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   18 (  10   ~;   3   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   1 sgn   5   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__NZ,conjecture,
    ! [X15] :
      ( s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X15) != s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0)))
     => s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X15))) != s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__NZ) ).

fof(thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__EQ__0,axiom,
    ! [X15] :
      ( s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X15))) = s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0)))
    <=> s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X15) = s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__EQ__0) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X15] :
        ( s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X15) != s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0)))
       => s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X15))) != s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0))) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__NZ]) ).

fof(c_0_3,plain,
    ! [X16,X16] :
      ( ( s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X16))) != s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0)))
        | s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X16) = s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0))) )
      & ( s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X16) != s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0)))
        | s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X16))) = s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0))) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__EQ__0])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),esk1_0) != s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0)))
    & s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),esk1_0))) = s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0))) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X1) = s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0)))
    | s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X1))) != s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),esk1_0))) = s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),esk1_0) != s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.08  % Problem  : ITP019+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.07/0.08  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.07/0.27  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.27  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.27  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.27  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.07/0.27  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.07/0.27  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.27  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.07/0.27  % DateTime : Thu Jun  2 18:47:46 EDT 2022
% 0.07/0.27  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/1.33  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.14/1.33  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.14/1.33  # Preprocessing time       : 0.009 s
% 0.14/1.33  
% 0.14/1.33  # Proof found!
% 0.14/1.33  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/1.33  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/1.33  # Proof object total steps             : 9
% 0.14/1.33  # Proof object clause steps            : 4
% 0.14/1.33  # Proof object formula steps           : 5
% 0.14/1.33  # Proof object conjectures             : 6
% 0.14/1.33  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 3
% 0.14/1.33  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.14/1.33  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 3
% 0.14/1.33  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 2
% 0.14/1.33  # Proof object generating inferences   : 1
% 0.14/1.33  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 1
% 0.14/1.33  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.14/1.33  # Parsed axioms                        : 29
% 0.14/1.33  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 27
% 0.14/1.33  # Initial clauses                      : 4
% 0.14/1.33  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.14/1.33  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 4
% 0.14/1.33  # Processed clauses                    : 3
% 0.14/1.33  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.14/1.33  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.14/1.33  # ...remaining for further processing  : 3
% 0.14/1.33  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.14/1.33  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.14/1.33  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.14/1.33  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.14/1.33  # Generated clauses                    : 1
% 0.14/1.33  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 0
% 0.14/1.33  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.14/1.33  # Paramodulations                      : 1
% 0.14/1.33  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.14/1.33  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.14/1.33  # Current number of processed clauses  : 3
% 0.14/1.33  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 0.14/1.33  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/1.33  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.14/1.33  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
% 0.14/1.33  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.14/1.33  # ...number of literals in the above   : 2
% 0.14/1.33  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.14/1.33  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.14/1.33  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.14/1.33  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/1.33  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.14/1.33  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/1.33  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.14/1.33  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.14/1.33  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.14/1.33  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.14/1.33  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.14/1.33  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1197
% 0.14/1.33  
% 0.14/1.33  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/1.33  # User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.14/1.33  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.14/1.33  # Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.14/1.33  # Maximum resident set size: 2724 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------