TSTP Solution File: ITP018+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : ITP018+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 00:35:40 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.07s 0.29s
% Output : Refutation 0.07s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.08 % Problem : ITP018+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.02/0.08 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.07/0.27 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.27 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.27 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.27 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.07/0.27 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.07/0.27 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.27 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.07/0.27 % DateTime : Fri Jun 3 23:22:47 EDT 2022
% 0.07/0.27 % CPUTime :
% 0.07/0.29
% 0.07/0.29 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.07/0.29 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.07/0.29 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.07/0.29 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.07/0.29 The process was started by sandbox2 on n032.cluster.edu,
% 0.07/0.29 Fri Jun 3 23:22:47 2022
% 0.07/0.29 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 10370.
% 0.07/0.29
% 0.07/0.29 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.07/0.29 set(auto).
% 0.07/0.29 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.07/0.29 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.07/0.29 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.07/0.29 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.07/0.29 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.07/0.29 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.07/0.29 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.07/0.29 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.07/0.29 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.07/0.29 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.07/0.29 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.07/0.29 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.07/0.29 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.07/0.29 clear(print_given).
% 0.07/0.29
% 0.07/0.29 formula_list(usable).
% 0.07/0.29
% 0.07/0.29 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.07/0.29
% 0.07/0.29 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.07/0.29 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.07/0.29 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.07/0.29 clauses in usable.
% 0.07/0.29
% 0.07/0.29 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.07/0.29 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.07/0.29 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.07/0.29 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.07/0.29 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.07/0.29 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.07/0.29 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.07/0.29 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.07/0.29 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.07/0.29 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.07/0.29 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.07/0.29 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.07/0.29 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.07/0.29 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.07/0.29 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.07/0.29
% 0.07/0.29 ------------> process usable:
% 0.07/0.29
% 0.07/0.29 ------------> process sos:
% 0.07/0.29 Following clause subsumed by 39 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2ET_2E0)).
% 0.07/0.29 39 back subsumes 30.
% 0.07/0.29
% 0.07/0.29 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.00 sec ----> 81 [binary,80.1,74.1] {-} $F.
% 0.07/0.29
% 0.07/0.29 Length of proof is 3. Level of proof is 2.
% 0.07/0.29
% 0.07/0.29 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.07/0.29 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.07/0.29 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.07/0.29
% 0.07/0.29 32 [] {-} s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg_2E1(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod($c2,$c1)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0)))))!=s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat($c2,$c1),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat($c2,$c1),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod($c2,$c1)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))))))).
% 0.07/0.29 55,54 [] {-} s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(A,B),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(A,B),C)))=s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(A,B),app_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(A,B),tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(A,B)),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E0),s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(A,B),C))).
% 0.07/0.29 57,56 [] {-} s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(A,B),C)))=s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,app_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(A,B),tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E0),s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(A,B),C))).
% 0.07/0.29 61,60 [] {-} s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(A,B),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(A,B)),C)))=s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(A,B),app_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(A,B)),tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(A,B)),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E0),s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(A,B)),C))).
% 0.07/0.29 65,64 [] {-} s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg_2E1(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,A)))=s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,app_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg_2E0),s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,A))).
% 0.07/0.29 67,66 [] {-} s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(A,B)),C)))=s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,app_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(A,B)),tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E0),s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(A,B)),C))).
% 0.07/0.29 68 [] {-} s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(A,B),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(A,B),C)))))=s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg_2E1(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(A,B),C))))).
% 0.07/0.29 70,69 [copy,68,demod,55,57,57,65] {-} s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,app_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(A,B),tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E0),s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(A,B),app_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(A,B),tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(A,B)),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E0),s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(A,B),C)))))=s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,app_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg_2E0),s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,app_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(A,B),tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E0),s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(A,B),C))))).
% 0.07/0.29 71 [] {-} s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(A,B)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0)))=s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(A,B),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(A,B)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))))).
% 0.07/0.29 73,72 [copy,71,demod,67,61,57,flip.1] {-} s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,app_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(A,B),tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E0),s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(A,B),app_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(A,B)),tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(A,B)),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E0),s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(A,B)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0)))))=s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,app_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(A,B)),tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E0),s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(A,B)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))).
% 0.07/0.29 74 [] {-} A=A.
% 0.07/0.29 80 [back_demod,32,demod,67,65,61,55,57,70,73] {-} s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,app_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg_2E0),s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,app_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod($c2,$c1)),tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E0),s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod($c2,$c1)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0)))))!=s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,app_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg_2E0),s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,app_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod($c2,$c1)),tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E0),s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod($c2,$c1)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))))).
% 0.07/0.29 81 [binary,80.1,74.1] {-} $F.
% 0.07/0.29
% 0.07/0.29 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.07/0.29 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.07/0.29
% 0.07/0.29
% 0.07/0.29 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.07/0.29
% 0.07/0.29
% 0.07/0.29 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.07/0.29
% 0.07/0.29 ============ end of search ============
% 0.07/0.29
% 0.07/0.29 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.07/0.29
% 0.07/0.29 Process 10370 finished Fri Jun 3 23:22:47 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------