TSTP Solution File: ITP018^4 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : ITP018^4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 22:15:41 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 10.34s 7.22s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 10.34s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   21
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (  11 unt;  18 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   11 (  10 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  254 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &; 251   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    4 (   4 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   13 (  13   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   16 (  14 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (   0   ^  19   !;   0   ?;  19   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    d: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort2,type,
    u: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort3,type,
    du: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort4,type,
    mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal: $tType ).

thf(decl_24,type,
    s: d > u > du ).

thf(decl_59,type,
    tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself: d > d ).

thf(decl_98,type,
    c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0: u ).

thf(decl_465,type,
    tyop_2Epair_2Eprod: d > d > d ).

thf(decl_7619,type,
    tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal: d ).

thf(decl_7707,type,
    mono_2Ec_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg: mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal > mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal ).

thf(decl_7773,type,
    j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal: du > mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal ).

thf(decl_9584,type,
    tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat: d > d > d ).

thf(decl_9730,type,
    c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1: du > u ).

thf(decl_9734,type,
    c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1: du > u ).

thf(decl_9756,type,
    c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1: du > u ).

thf(decl_9805,type,
    c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1: du > u ).

thf(decl_10179,type,
    esk1_0: d ).

thf(decl_10180,type,
    esk2_0: d ).

thf(thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eneg__ulp,conjecture,
    ! [X27483: d,X27485: d] :
      ( ( mono_2Ec_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg @ ( j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( s @ tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself @ ( tyop_2Epair_2Eprod @ X27483 @ X27485 ) ) @ c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0 ) ) ) ) )
      = ( j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( s @ tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat @ X27483 @ X27485 ) @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat @ X27483 @ X27485 ) @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself @ ( tyop_2Epair_2Eprod @ X27483 @ X27485 ) ) @ c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eneg__ulp) ).

thf(thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real__negate,axiom,
    ! [X1: d,X2: d,X6: u] :
      ( ( j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( s @ tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat @ X1 @ X2 ) @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X6 ) ) ) ) ) )
      = ( mono_2Ec_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg @ ( j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( s @ tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X6 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real__negate) ).

thf(thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp,axiom,
    ! [X27483: d,X27485: d] :
      ( ( j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( s @ tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself @ ( tyop_2Epair_2Eprod @ X27483 @ X27485 ) ) @ c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0 ) ) ) )
      = ( j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( s @ tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat @ X27483 @ X27485 ) @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself @ ( tyop_2Epair_2Eprod @ X27483 @ X27485 ) ) @ c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp) ).

thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X27483: d,X27485: d] :
        ( ( mono_2Ec_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg @ ( j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( s @ tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself @ ( tyop_2Epair_2Eprod @ X27483 @ X27485 ) ) @ c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0 ) ) ) ) )
        = ( j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( s @ tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat @ X27483 @ X27485 ) @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat @ X27483 @ X27485 ) @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself @ ( tyop_2Epair_2Eprod @ X27483 @ X27485 ) ) @ c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eneg__ulp]) ).

thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( mono_2Ec_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg @ ( j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( s @ tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself @ ( tyop_2Epair_2Eprod @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) ) @ c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0 ) ) ) ) )
   != ( j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( s @ tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself @ ( tyop_2Epair_2Eprod @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) ) @ c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X45875: d,X45876: d,X45877: u] :
      ( ( j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( s @ tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat @ X45875 @ X45876 ) @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat @ X45875 @ X45876 ) @ X45877 ) ) ) ) ) )
      = ( mono_2Ec_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg @ ( j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( s @ tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat @ X45875 @ X45876 ) @ X45877 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real__negate]) ).

thf(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X46294: d,X46295: d] :
      ( ( j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( s @ tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself @ ( tyop_2Epair_2Eprod @ X46294 @ X46295 ) ) @ c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0 ) ) ) )
      = ( j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( s @ tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat @ X46294 @ X46295 ) @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself @ ( tyop_2Epair_2Eprod @ X46294 @ X46295 ) ) @ c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp]) ).

thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( mono_2Ec_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg @ ( j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( s @ tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself @ ( tyop_2Epair_2Eprod @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) ) @ c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0 ) ) ) ) )
   != ( j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( s @ tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself @ ( tyop_2Epair_2Eprod @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) ) @ c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

thf(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X1: d,X2: d,X3: u] :
      ( ( j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( s @ tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat @ X1 @ X2 ) @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X3 ) ) ) ) ) )
      = ( mono_2Ec_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg @ ( j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( s @ tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X3 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

thf(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X1: d,X2: d] :
      ( ( j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( s @ tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself @ ( tyop_2Epair_2Eprod @ X1 @ X2 ) ) @ c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0 ) ) ) )
      = ( j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( s @ tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat @ X1 @ X2 ) @ ( c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1 @ ( s @ ( tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself @ ( tyop_2Epair_2Eprod @ X1 @ X2 ) ) @ c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : ITP018^4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Sat May 18 18:17:10 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.48  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 10.34/7.22  # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 10.34/7.22  # partial match(3): HMLMSLSLSSSCHFA
% 10.34/7.22  # Preprocessing class: HMLLMLLLSSSCHFA.
% 10.34/7.22  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 295 seconds (2360 total)
% 10.34/7.22  # Starting new_ho_2 with 1180s (4) cores
% 10.34/7.22  # Starting sh3l with 590s (2) cores
% 10.34/7.22  # Starting lpo5_rw_fix with 295s (1) cores
% 10.34/7.22  # Starting full_lambda_7 with 295s (1) cores
% 10.34/7.22  # lpo5_rw_fix with pid 18575 completed with status 0
% 10.34/7.22  # Result found by lpo5_rw_fix
% 10.34/7.22  # partial match(3): HMLMSLSLSSSCHFA
% 10.34/7.22  # Preprocessing class: HMLLMLLLSSSCHFA.
% 10.34/7.22  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 295 seconds (2360 total)
% 10.34/7.22  # Starting new_ho_2 with 1180s (4) cores
% 10.34/7.22  # Starting sh3l with 590s (2) cores
% 10.34/7.22  # Starting lpo5_rw_fix with 295s (1) cores
% 10.34/7.22  # SinE strategy is gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000
% 10.34/7.22  # Search class: HGHSM-SSLM33-DHFFFFBN
% 10.34/7.22  # partial match(2): HGHSM-SSLM32-MHFFFFBN
% 10.34/7.22  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 295 seconds (295 total)
% 10.34/7.22  # Starting new_ho_10 with 160s (1) cores
% 10.34/7.22  # new_ho_10 with pid 18577 completed with status 0
% 10.34/7.22  # Result found by new_ho_10
% 10.34/7.22  # partial match(3): HMLMSLSLSSSCHFA
% 10.34/7.22  # Preprocessing class: HMLLMLLLSSSCHFA.
% 10.34/7.22  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 295 seconds (2360 total)
% 10.34/7.22  # Starting new_ho_2 with 1180s (4) cores
% 10.34/7.22  # Starting sh3l with 590s (2) cores
% 10.34/7.22  # Starting lpo5_rw_fix with 295s (1) cores
% 10.34/7.22  # SinE strategy is gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000
% 10.34/7.22  # Search class: HGHSM-SSLM33-DHFFFFBN
% 10.34/7.22  # partial match(2): HGHSM-SSLM32-MHFFFFBN
% 10.34/7.22  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 295 seconds (295 total)
% 10.34/7.22  # Starting new_ho_10 with 160s (1) cores
% 10.34/7.22  # Preprocessing time       : 0.089 s
% 10.34/7.22  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 10.34/7.22  
% 10.34/7.22  # Proof found!
% 10.34/7.22  # SZS status Theorem
% 10.34/7.22  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 10.34/7.22  # Parsed axioms                        : 62911
% 10.34/7.22  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 61910
% 10.34/7.22  # Initial clauses                      : 1563
% 10.34/7.22  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 86
% 10.34/7.22  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 1477
% 10.34/7.22  # Processed clauses                    : 675
% 10.34/7.22  # ...of these trivial                  : 157
% 10.34/7.22  # ...subsumed                          : 391
% 10.34/7.22  # ...remaining for further processing  : 127
% 10.34/7.22  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 14
% 10.34/7.22  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 10.34/7.22  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 10.34/7.22  # Backward-rewritten                   : 4
% 10.34/7.22  # Generated clauses                    : 10
% 10.34/7.22  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 10.34/7.22  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 10.34/7.22  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 10.34/7.22  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 10.34/7.22  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 10.34/7.22  # NegExts                              : 0
% 10.34/7.22  # Equation resolutions                 : 14
% 10.34/7.22  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 10.34/7.22  # Total rewrite steps                  : 254
% 10.34/7.22  # ...of those cached                   : 221
% 10.34/7.22  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 10.34/7.22  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 10.34/7.22  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 10.34/7.22  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 10.34/7.22  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 10.34/7.22  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 10.34/7.22  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 10.34/7.22  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 10.34/7.22  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 10.34/7.22  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 10.34/7.22  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 10.34/7.22  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 10.34/7.22  # Current number of processed clauses  : 113
% 10.34/7.22  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 20
% 10.34/7.22  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 10.34/7.22  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 10.34/7.22  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 88
% 10.34/7.22  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 806
% 10.34/7.22  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1312
% 10.34/7.22  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 10.34/7.22  # Current number of archived clauses   : 4
% 10.34/7.22  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2530
% 10.34/7.22  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1854
% 10.34/7.22  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 262
% 10.34/7.22  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 10.34/7.22  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 10.34/7.22  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 6
% 10.34/7.22  # BW rewrite match successes           : 3
% 10.34/7.22  # Condensation attempts                : 675
% 10.34/7.22  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 10.34/7.22  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2275126
% 10.34/7.22  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 463159
% 10.34/7.22  
% 10.34/7.22  # -------------------------------------------------
% 10.34/7.22  # User time                : 0.853 s
% 10.34/7.22  # System time              : 0.172 s
% 10.34/7.22  # Total time               : 1.025 s
% 10.34/7.22  # Maximum resident set size: 122144 pages
% 10.34/7.22  
% 10.34/7.22  # -------------------------------------------------
% 10.34/7.22  # User time                : 6.381 s
% 10.34/7.22  # System time              : 0.277 s
% 10.34/7.22  # Total time               : 6.658 s
% 10.34/7.22  # Maximum resident set size: 104860 pages
% 10.34/7.22  % E---3.1 exiting
% 10.34/7.22  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------