TSTP Solution File: ITP017+2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : ITP017+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 00:35:39 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.18s 0.43s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : ITP017+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 3 03:31:17 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.42 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.18/0.42 The process was started by sandbox on n029.cluster.edu,
% 0.18/0.42 Fri Jun 3 03:31:17 2022
% 0.18/0.42 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 11661.
% 0.18/0.42
% 0.18/0.42 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.18/0.42 set(auto).
% 0.18/0.42 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.18/0.42 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.18/0.42 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.18/0.42 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.18/0.42 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.18/0.42 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.18/0.42 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.18/0.42 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.18/0.42 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.18/0.42 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.18/0.42 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.18/0.42 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.18/0.42 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.18/0.42 clear(print_given).
% 0.18/0.42
% 0.18/0.42 formula_list(usable).
% 0.18/0.42
% 0.18/0.42 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.18/0.42
% 0.18/0.42 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.18/0.42 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.18/0.42 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.18/0.42 clauses in usable.
% 0.18/0.42
% 0.18/0.42 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.18/0.42 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.18/0.42 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.18/0.42 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.18/0.42 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.18/0.42 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.18/0.42 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.18/0.42 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.18/0.42 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.18/0.42 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.18/0.42 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.18/0.42 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.18/0.42 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.18/0.42 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.18/0.42 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.18/0.42
% 0.18/0.42 ------------> process usable:
% 0.18/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 7 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ne(A)| -ne(B)| -mem(C,A)| -mem(D,B)|ap(k(B,C),D)=C.
% 0.18/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 48 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ne(A)| -mem(B,A)| -mem(C,A)|B=C|C!=B.
% 0.18/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 69 during input processing: 0 [flip.2] {-} -mem(A,ty_2Enum_2Enum)|ap(c_2Earithmetic_2ENUMERAL,A)!=c_2Enum_2E0|A=c_2Earithmetic_2EZERO.
% 0.18/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 70 during input processing: 0 [flip.2] {-} -mem(A,ty_2Enum_2Enum)|ap(c_2Earithmetic_2ENUMERAL,A)=c_2Enum_2E0|A!=c_2Earithmetic_2EZERO.
% 0.18/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 103 during input processing: 0 [propositional,factor_simp] {-} -mem(B,ty_2Enum_2Enum)|ap(c_2Earithmetic_2EBIT1,B)!=c_2Earithmetic_2EZERO.
% 0.18/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 105 during input processing: 0 [propositional,factor_simp] {-} -mem(B,ty_2Enum_2Enum)|ap(c_2Earithmetic_2EBIT2,B)!=c_2Earithmetic_2EZERO.
% 0.18/0.42
% 0.18/0.42 ------------> process sos:
% 0.18/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 437 during input processing: 0 [copy,437,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.18/0.42 437 back subsumes 378.
% 0.18/0.42 437 back subsumes 377.
% 0.18/0.42 437 back subsumes 331.
% 0.18/0.42 437 back subsumes 327.
% 0.18/0.42 437 back subsumes 322.
% 0.18/0.42 437 back subsumes 321.
% 0.18/0.42 437 back subsumes 290.
% 0.18/0.42 437 back subsumes 286.
% 0.18/0.42 437 back subsumes 280.
% 0.18/0.42 437 back subsumes 279.
% 0.18/0.42 437 back subsumes 278.
% 0.18/0.42 437 back subsumes 277.
% 0.18/0.42 437 back subsumes 267.
% 0.18/0.42 437 back subsumes 266.
% 0.18/0.42 437 back subsumes 254.
% 0.18/0.42 437 back subsumes 242.
% 0.18/0.42 437 back subsumes 241.
% 0.18/0.42 437 back subsumes 240.
% 0.18/0.42 437 back subsumes 239.
% 0.18/0.42 437 back subsumes 47.
% 0.18/0.42
% 0.18/0.42 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 0.18/0.43 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.18/0.43 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.18/0.43 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 0.18/0.43 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.18/0.43 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.18/0.43 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43 The job finished Fri Jun 3 03:31:17 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------