TSTP Solution File: ITP010_1 by Z3---4.8.9.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Z3---4.8.9.0
% Problem : ITP010_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Sep 17 04:14:54 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.40s
% Output : Proof 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 2 unt; 6 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 23 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 30 ( 17 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 13 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of FOOLs : 1 ( 1 fml; 0 var)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 8 ( 5 >; 3 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 6 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 32 ( 28 !; 0 ?; 32 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(p_type,type,
p: mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool > $o ).
tff(j_mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool_type,type,
j_mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool: du > mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool ).
tff(s_type,type,
s: ( d * u ) > du ).
tff(c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq_2E2_type,type,
c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq_2E2: ( du * du ) > u ).
tff(tyop_2Emin_2Efun_type,type,
tyop_2Emin_2Efun: ( d * d ) > d ).
tff(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool_type,type,
tyop_2Emin_2Ebool: d ).
tff(1,plain,
( ~ $true
<=> $false ),
inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).
tff(2,plain,
( ! [A_27a: d,A_27b: d,V0s_2E0: u,V1t_2E0: u] : $true
<=> $true ),
inference(elim_unused_vars,[status(thm)],]) ).
tff(3,plain,
^ [A_27a: d,A_27b: d,V0s_2E0: u,V1t_2E0: u] :
rewrite(
( ( ~ p(j_mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(A_27a,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),V0s_2E0),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(A_27b,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),V1t_2E0)))))
<=> ~ p(j_mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(A_27a,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),V0s_2E0),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(A_27b,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),V1t_2E0))))) )
<=> $true )),
inference(bind,[status(th)],]) ).
tff(4,plain,
( ! [A_27a: d,A_27b: d,V0s_2E0: u,V1t_2E0: u] :
( ~ p(j_mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(A_27a,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),V0s_2E0),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(A_27b,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),V1t_2E0)))))
<=> ~ p(j_mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(A_27a,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),V0s_2E0),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(A_27b,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),V1t_2E0))))) )
<=> ! [A_27a: d,A_27b: d,V0s_2E0: u,V1t_2E0: u] : $true ),
inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
tff(5,plain,
( ! [A_27a: d,A_27b: d,V0s_2E0: u,V1t_2E0: u] :
( ~ p(j_mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(A_27a,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),V0s_2E0),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(A_27b,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),V1t_2E0)))))
<=> ~ p(j_mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(A_27a,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),V0s_2E0),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(A_27b,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),V1t_2E0))))) )
<=> $true ),
inference(transitivity,[status(thm)],[4,2]) ).
tff(6,plain,
( ~ ! [A_27a: d,A_27b: d,V0s_2E0: u,V1t_2E0: u] :
( ~ p(j_mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(A_27a,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),V0s_2E0),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(A_27b,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),V1t_2E0)))))
<=> ~ p(j_mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(A_27a,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),V0s_2E0),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(A_27b,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),V1t_2E0))))) )
<=> ~ $true ),
inference(monotonicity,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
tff(7,plain,
( ~ ! [A_27a: d,A_27b: d,V0s_2E0: u,V1t_2E0: u] :
( ~ p(j_mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(A_27a,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),V0s_2E0),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(A_27b,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),V1t_2E0)))))
<=> ~ p(j_mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(A_27a,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),V0s_2E0),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(A_27b,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),V1t_2E0))))) )
<=> $false ),
inference(transitivity,[status(thm)],[6,1]) ).
tff(8,axiom,
~ ! [A_27a: d,A_27b: d,V0s_2E0: u,V1t_2E0: u] :
( ~ p(j_mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(A_27a,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),V0s_2E0),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(A_27b,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),V1t_2E0)))))
<=> ~ p(j_mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(A_27a,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),V0s_2E0),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(A_27b,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),V1t_2E0))))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Ecardinal_2ECARD__NOT__LE) ).
tff(9,plain,
$false,
inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[8,7]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : ITP010_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.10/0.13 % Command : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Sep 1 02:27:47 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 Z3tptp [4.8.9.0] (c) 2006-20**. Microsoft Corp.
% 0.14/0.35 Usage: tptp [options] [-file:]file
% 0.14/0.35 -h, -? prints this message.
% 0.14/0.35 -smt2 print SMT-LIB2 benchmark.
% 0.14/0.35 -m, -model generate model.
% 0.14/0.35 -p, -proof generate proof.
% 0.14/0.35 -c, -core generate unsat core of named formulas.
% 0.14/0.35 -st, -statistics display statistics.
% 0.14/0.35 -t:timeout set timeout (in second).
% 0.14/0.35 -smt2status display status in smt2 format instead of SZS.
% 0.14/0.35 -check_status check the status produced by Z3 against annotation in benchmark.
% 0.14/0.35 -<param>:<value> configuration parameter and value.
% 0.14/0.35 -o:<output-file> file to place output in.
% 0.14/0.40 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.40 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------