TSTP Solution File: ITP010^1 by Lash---1.13
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Lash---1.13
% Problem : ITP010^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : lash -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 04:00:59 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 0.40s
% Output : Proof 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(ty_mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2EF,type,
mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2EF: $o ).
thf(ty_mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET,type,
mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET: $o ).
thf(sP1,plain,
( sP1
<=> $false ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP1])]) ).
thf(sP2,plain,
( sP2
<=> mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2EF ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP2])]) ).
thf(sP3,plain,
( sP3
<=> mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP3])]) ).
thf(thm_2Ecardinal_2ECARD__NOT__LE,conjecture,
~ sP1 ).
thf(h0,negated_conjecture,
sP1,
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm_2Ecardinal_2ECARD__NOT__LE]) ).
thf(h1,assumption,
~ sP1,
introduced(assumption,[]) ).
thf(h2,assumption,
sP3,
introduced(assumption,[]) ).
thf(h3,assumption,
sP1,
introduced(assumption,[]) ).
thf(h4,assumption,
~ sP3,
introduced(assumption,[]) ).
thf(h5,assumption,
( ~ sP3 = sP2 ),
introduced(assumption,[]) ).
thf(h6,assumption,
( ~ sP2 = sP3 ),
introduced(assumption,[]) ).
thf(h7,assumption,
sP2,
introduced(assumption,[]) ).
thf(h8,assumption,
~ sP2,
introduced(assumption,[]) ).
thf(1,plain,
$false,
inference(tab_conflict,[status(thm),assumptions([h8,h2,h4,h7,h5,h6,h1,h2,h0])],[h7,h8]) ).
thf(2,plain,
$false,
inference(tab_conflict,[status(thm),assumptions([h7,h4,h4,h7,h5,h6,h1,h2,h0])],[h2,h4]) ).
thf(3,plain,
$false,
inference(tab_bq,[status(thm),assumptions([h4,h7,h5,h6,h1,h2,h0]),tab_bq(discharge,[h8,h2]),tab_bq(discharge,[h7,h4])],[h6,1,2,h8,h2,h7,h4]) ).
thf(4,plain,
~ sP1,
inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(5,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_unsat,[status(thm),assumptions([h8,h2,h2,h8,h5,h6,h1,h2,h0])],[4,h0]) ).
thf(6,plain,
$false,
inference(tab_conflict,[status(thm),assumptions([h7,h4,h2,h8,h5,h6,h1,h2,h0])],[h2,h4]) ).
thf(7,plain,
$false,
inference(tab_bq,[status(thm),assumptions([h2,h8,h5,h6,h1,h2,h0]),tab_bq(discharge,[h8,h2]),tab_bq(discharge,[h7,h4])],[h6,5,6,h8,h2,h7,h4]) ).
thf(8,plain,
$false,
inference(tab_bq,[status(thm),assumptions([h5,h6,h1,h2,h0]),tab_bq(discharge,[h4,h7]),tab_bq(discharge,[h2,h8])],[h5,3,7,h4,h7,h2,h8]) ).
thf(thm_2Ebool_2ENOT__CLAUSES,axiom,
~ ( ( ~ sP3 = sP2 )
=> ( ~ sP2 != sP3 ) ) ).
thf(9,plain,
$false,
inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h1,h2,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h5,h6])],[thm_2Ebool_2ENOT__CLAUSES,8,h5,h6]) ).
thf(10,plain,
$false,
inference(tab_conflict,[status(thm),assumptions([h8,h2,h4,h7,h5,h6,h3,h4,h0])],[h7,h8]) ).
thf(thm_2Ebool_2ETRUTH,axiom,
sP3 ).
thf(11,plain,
$false,
inference(tab_conflict,[status(thm),assumptions([h7,h4,h4,h7,h5,h6,h3,h4,h0])],[thm_2Ebool_2ETRUTH,h4]) ).
thf(12,plain,
$false,
inference(tab_bq,[status(thm),assumptions([h4,h7,h5,h6,h3,h4,h0]),tab_bq(discharge,[h8,h2]),tab_bq(discharge,[h7,h4])],[h6,10,11,h8,h2,h7,h4]) ).
thf(13,plain,
$false,
inference(tab_conflict,[status(thm),assumptions([h8,h2,h2,h8,h5,h6,h3,h4,h0])],[h2,h4]) ).
thf(14,plain,
$false,
inference(tab_conflict,[status(thm),assumptions([h7,h4,h2,h8,h5,h6,h3,h4,h0])],[h2,h4]) ).
thf(15,plain,
$false,
inference(tab_bq,[status(thm),assumptions([h2,h8,h5,h6,h3,h4,h0]),tab_bq(discharge,[h8,h2]),tab_bq(discharge,[h7,h4])],[h6,13,14,h8,h2,h7,h4]) ).
thf(16,plain,
$false,
inference(tab_bq,[status(thm),assumptions([h5,h6,h3,h4,h0]),tab_bq(discharge,[h4,h7]),tab_bq(discharge,[h2,h8])],[h5,12,15,h4,h7,h2,h8]) ).
thf(17,plain,
$false,
inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h3,h4,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h5,h6])],[thm_2Ebool_2ENOT__CLAUSES,16,h5,h6]) ).
thf(thm_2Ebool_2EREFL__CLAUSE,axiom,
( ~ sP1 = sP3 ) ).
thf(18,plain,
$false,
inference(tab_bq,[status(thm),assumptions([h0]),tab_bq(discharge,[h1,h2]),tab_bq(discharge,[h3,h4])],[thm_2Ebool_2EREFL__CLAUSE,9,17,h1,h2,h3,h4]) ).
thf(0,theorem,
~ sP1,
inference(contra,[status(thm),contra(discharge,[h0])],[18,h0]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : ITP010^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : lash -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 16:14:49 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.40 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.40 % Mode: cade22grackle2xfee4
% 0.18/0.40 % Steps: 5
% 0.18/0.40 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------